Quote: "Hey Jeku, how about you cut back the tone a bit huh? This thread has been perfectly fine with out sarcasm. Your a mod for god sake."
Um, what? Did I miss something? I'm giving my opinion on the debate. If you disagree and can't handle it, then go away. Nobody's forcing you to respond. My tone is serious, not sarcastic. And because I'm a mod doesn't mean I have to watch what I say any more than anyone else here
I'm not towing the "rape and mugging simulator" line, ok?
Quote: "You took offense to that?"
I take offense to people sensationalizing things in a game, when they either a.) were not intended by the developer, or b.) not even true.
Quote: "Oh really? Then how did it get in there? Explain that to me. That must be some amazing, self-programming game right there. Maybe TGC out to invest in that technology. And while their at it, invest in 'hot coffee.'"
You're the sarcastic one here.
As a developer with an interest in AI, I can sometimes tell when certain things were as intended. What I mean by that is, the developers designed the game so that you can shoot ANYONE and run down ANYONE in the game--- friend, foe, random old lady, etc., and they drop money when they die. They also designed the game so that you can have sex with a prostitute. Their intention wasn't so you can bang a prostitute, then shoot her to get your money back. That is a situational outcome. You can do A and/or B and/or C etc. You can also do A
then B or B
then C. It doesn't mean the developers intended the players to do it in that order.
This is why people like Jack Thompson can't understand intent. Sure, the developers could have just removed the prostitutes entirely from the game. They could have also made it so old ladies are invincible to cars and guns, which would be really silly obviously.