Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Warning: Your Forum Name needs to have some spaces in it if you want to have it that long!

Author
Message
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 28th Feb 2009 18:37 Edited at: 28th Feb 2009 18:38
Can we raise the username character limit to 10 chars? When updating my signature, I used to be able to just put a space at the end of my name so the form would save, but this no longer works (For good reason I'm sure). I know this is a lot to ask, but I like my name

"I acctually quite like this site. And noone will know because this is a secret..." - Anonymous
Shhdb.com
Sid Sinister
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jul 2005
Location:
Posted: 28th Feb 2009 19:11
I think we need a longer signature too.

"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants" - Isaac Newton
-Computer Animation Major @Baker.edu-
Quirkyjim
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2008
Location: At my computer
Posted: 28th Feb 2009 20:18
puppyofkosh
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jan 2007
Location:
Posted: 28th Feb 2009 22:08
I like the avatar sizes actually.
Quirkyjim
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2008
Location: At my computer
Posted: 28th Feb 2009 22:12
Funny how you don't have an avatar, though...

~QJ
Alucard94
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jul 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden.
Posted: 28th Feb 2009 22:24
The avatar size is fine, I don't see why people care so much about a little image. I do agree that the signature needs to be expanded.


Alucard94, the member of the future of the past.
Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 28th Feb 2009 23:53
Quote: " I do agree that the signature needs to be expanded."


No way... I think they're too big already. Why would they need to be bigger when most serve no purpose anyway?

AndrewT
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 00:35
Quote: "most serve no purpose anyway?"


*cough* Alucard *cough*



BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:05
There's a limit on usernames that's less than 10 characters? Then how did Nex the Fairly Fast Ferret get his name in there? I'm confused.

NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:13
Because I'm magic.

bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:14
Because he has spaces in his name. If I want to change my sig now (and thus save my profile) I would have to be Jerico 2day, or Jerico2 day... but not Jerico2day

"I acctually quite like this site. And noone will know because this is a secret..." - Anonymous
Shhdb.com
BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:20
Sorry, still confused...do you mean you can add spaces to your username at will, but not remove them? And why do you have to change your username to change your sig?

My sig is different!
soapyfish
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Oct 2003
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:23 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 01:30
Can we please get rid of the smilies. The yellow is a very confrontational colour. The blue for new posts is cold and unwelcoming whereas the grey for read posts sucks away at my imagine, destroying any chance I had of making an informed and witty reply. Also, these avatars are too square, can we have them in the shape of a four-leaved clover. The signatures should be replaced by the user's home address so I can contact them in place of a private messaging system.

I shall return tomorrow and will expect you to have made good progress.

Thank you and good day.

EDIT:: I have removed all question marks as these are merely reasonable demands.


Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:24
One of the FPSC users had this problem too. They couldn't change their sig with their current user name. It's very odd.

I wonder if the system would let me, or any mod, change your sig or if we would get the error too.

NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:24
The limitation on the length of words in a username was added to make them word wrap in the left frame, I imagine, rather than stretch it out halfway across the screen.

BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:25 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 01:26
Quote: "Can we get rid of the smilies please, the yellow is a very confrontational colour. The blue for new posts is cold and unwelcoming whereas the grey for read posts sucks away at my imagine, destroying any chance I had of making an informed and witty post. Also, these avatars are too square, can we have them in the shape of a four-leaved clover. The signatures should be replaced by the user's home address so I can contact them in place of a private messaging system."


hehe, I wasn't sure if you were being sarcastic or not until the four-leaved clover one

@Nex
Ah, so it's a limitation on how many character you can have without them being seperated by a space?

Aaron Miller
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Playing: osu!
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:27
Quote: "No way... I think they're too big already. Why would they need to be bigger when most serve no purpose anyway?"

... You're joking, right? I don't think we're talking about image sizes. I think the signature character limit should be expanded! OR AT LEAST MAKE IT SO THAT CODE CHARACTERS DON'T GET COUNTED. For example, if I have an image at some URL and DON'T want to use tinyurl (for whatever reason) then the code to use the image could end up being around 30-60 characters, which makes LESS space for me to put text! The very act of formatting my signature with any form of BBCode could remove several characters from what I can actually type. They should AT THE VERY LEAST discount BBcode from the character limit.

I'm sure there are numerous technical reasons that make that difficult, and they don't see it as a priority...

Cheers,

-naota

I'm not a dictator to those that do stuff for me by will. Only those who don't.
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:28 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 01:30
Quote: "The limitation on the length of words in a username was added to make them word wrap in the left frame, I imagine, rather than stretch it out halfway across the screen."


Having a 10 character username with no spaces in between is fairly common, and won't stetch the left panel because my username doesn't currently (in fact, it looks like I could fit 20 characters in the left column!).

I can't update my sig because now I receive a warning that my username has too many characters without any spaces in between.

To update my sig, I'd have to change my username. I've used this username here for years (well, you can see my join date)

"I acctually quite like this site. And noone will know because this is a secret..." - Anonymous
Shhdb.com
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:29
Quote: "Why would they need to be bigger when most serve no purpose anyway?"


They could be a bit larger horizontally...
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:30
I disagree. Try viewing this page on a 800x480 display (800x600 being the standard to be honest) and tell me they need to be.

AndrewT
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:30 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 01:31
EDITED

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:34 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 01:35
Quote: "Try viewing this page on a 800x480 display (800x600 being the standard to be honest) and tell me they need to be."


How much longer should webpages be concerned for people with 800x600 monitors? I mean really.

bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:35 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 01:35
Quote: "One of the FPSC users had this problem too. They couldn't change their sig with their current user name. It's very odd.

I wonder if the system would let me, or any mod, change your sig or if we would get the error too."


Could you give it a try? This is what I want:



"I acctually quite like this site. And noone will know because this is a secret..." - Anonymous
Shhdb.com
BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:37
Still, even if a mod can change it, you don't want to have to run to a mod whenever you want a new sig.

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:37
Quote: "Could you give it a try? This is what I want:"


Alright I've updated your sig and got no errors

NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:38
@Jeku

You're telling me you've never sat down in front of the TV and dusted off the standard definition Wii for browsing the forums? (although the Wii isn't really too good at that as well as games) Not to mention that netbooks... eh, meant for browsing the net, typically use either 800x480 or 1024x600 displays.

bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 01:45
Quote: "Still, even if a mod can change it, you don't want to have to run to a mod whenever you want a new sig."


Nope, that's why I made this post instead of emailing a mod Though, thanks Jeku!

As for resolution, that's true, the small machines are definitely hitting big, and they have low res screens. Browsing the forums on my psp is a chore, especially when there's any kind of large image embedded in a thread.

Jimpo
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Apr 2005
Location:
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 06:44
I agree with Aaron Miller about the signature character limit being expanded. It's ridiculous how it is now! I wanted to link to all my completed DBPro games in my sig as well as my current WIP, but my 7 letters were already pushing the character limit.

Like Aaron Miller said, make it so code characters don't count towards the limit.

Alucard94
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jul 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden.
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 12:16
Quote: "No way... I think they're too big already. Why would they need to be bigger when most serve no purpose anyway?
"



Quote: "*cough* Alucard *cough*"


First of all, I wasn't talking about the allowed image size, I was talking about the amount of characters allowed in the signature space.
Second, the only reason I have this image is that I simply don't have the room to write the thing I want to write in the signature.


Alucard94, the member of the future of the past.
David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 12:21 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 12:26
Quote: "(800x600 being the standard to be honest)"


1024x768 and 1280x1024 are the (low end) standards, 800x600 is dead


09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
Veron
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Nov 2006
Location:
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 13:08
1024x768 is definitely the standard, 800x600, like others have said, is dead.

Grandma
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Dec 2005
Location: Norway, Guiding the New World Order
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 13:12 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 13:23
Quote: "800x600 is dead"

I highly doubt that. I've seen my share of computers because I'm the 'guy' everyone needs if something is wrong with their computer. I also was assigned to run around town to different businesses and update their computer's firmware-something. There was a great number of 800x600 resolutions going around.

Edit: You also have people such as my mother, and brother who simply likes 800x600 better. Just like I don't use desktop baground pictures or windows themes. Not becasue I can't but because I see no good reason to.

This message was brought to you by Grandma industries.

Making yesterdays games, today!
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 13:18
Even 640x480 is used more than you ignorant people know. Many educational and business organizations can't upgrade every time someone decides they need more damned pixels.



800x600 is far from dead; if it was, I wouldn't have bought one of these just six months ago.

AndrewT
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 13:49
I know a lot of people, including my parents and my brother, who like to get 20" monitors and set the resolution to 800x600 just so everything looks bigger.

Paul Johnston
TGC Developer
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Nov 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 15:34
Forum name limit increased to 15 characters before a space is required.
Avatars I quite like as they are
Signature character limit is a database limit. It wasn't designed for more.
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 15:35
That's why you up the DPI.

soapyfish
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Oct 2003
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 16:26 Edited at: 1st Mar 2009 16:28
I can't yet see any of the changes that I suggested. Come on people! I pay my monthly subscription to this forum for a reason.


Keo C
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere between here and there.
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 18:17
Quote: "I can't yet see any of the changes that I suggested. Come on people! I pay my monthly subscription to this forum for a reason.
"

Monthly subscription? Oh never mind, forget I brought it up.


Image made by the overworked Biggadd.
Oolite
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th Sep 2005
Location: Middle of the West
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 18:21
Speaking of which, i have a request, i wish for the monthly subscription fee to be lowered by 2 quid to minus £2.
I believe myself and the rest of the regulars have earned that right, at least.

Quirkyjim
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2008
Location: At my computer
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 18:31
Quote: "I believe myself and the rest of the regulars"


LOL

~QJ
David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 1st Mar 2009 23:19
Quote: "I pay my monthly subscription to this forum for a reason."


Although this is clearly a 'stab' at those pushing for change on a forum which is provided for free, it's worth noting that TGC presumably make a sizable income from the advertising on the site - which wouldn't be the case without us viewing it.

So pushing for change (as both customers and advertising money-spinners for TGC) on this forum is a sensible and reasonable thing to do


09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
AndrewT
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posted: 2nd Mar 2009 00:27 Edited at: 2nd Mar 2009 00:27
Quote: "i wish for the monthly subscription fee to be lowered by 2 quid to minus £2."


Minus £2 is a little steep for an online game dev forum if you ask me. I suggest a weekly fee of about minus $1,400; that way I can make my living by being active on a forum!

Sid Sinister
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jul 2005
Location:
Posted: 2nd Mar 2009 00:40
Quote: "OR AT LEAST MAKE IT SO THAT CODE CHARACTERS DON'T GET COUNTED"


That would be a good compromise.

"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants" - Isaac Newton
-Computer Animation Major @Baker.edu-
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 2nd Mar 2009 08:56
Quote: "So pushing for change (as both customers and advertising money-spinners for TGC) on this forum is a sensible and reasonable thing to do"


I've seen Rich and Paul update the forum tons for things that are essential, and eventually they'll get around to fixing/updating nice-to-haves.

Quirkyjim
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2008
Location: At my computer
Posted: 2nd Mar 2009 23:09
How about we get paid for useful posts, and charged for useless ones? That would promote useful posting, but it might also cause people to stretch it. Might also encourage people to buy TGC products if that's a requirement to join (yes, I know that it's not now, but if you start PAYING people to be active, would you make it free?)

~QJ
Uncle Sam
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Jul 2005
Location: West Coast, USA
Posted: 4th Mar 2009 02:22
One useful argument would be that any geek on this forum should have a monitor or LCD with a resolution higher than that of 800x600.

Aaron Miller
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Playing: osu!
Posted: 5th Mar 2009 03:23 Edited at: 5th Mar 2009 03:24
If the database limit is the problem with signatures then use binary instead of text. For example, instead of storing "[ i ]" as text you can store a single byte, like 0x03. 0x01 = bold, 0x02 = underline, 0x03 = italic, 0x04 = center, 0x05 = quote, 0x06 = email, 0x07 = image, 0x08 = link, 0x09 = code, 0x0A = stop bold, 0x0B = stop underline, 0x0C = stop italic (etc). I think this would at least be worth a try. It would definitely allow more room, and shouldn't be that hard to implement, if it would even be hard to implement. That kind of thing is dreadfully easy in C++ and C...

Just some pseudo code:


Displaying it wouldn't be that hard either... (And yes I know I can optimize my code by a large margin, but I'm just trying to make a point).

Cheers,

-naota

I'm not a dictator to those that do stuff for me by will. Only those who don't.
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 5th Mar 2009 04:18 Edited at: 5th Mar 2009 04:18
This isn't C++ for one thing, and another, your example is hexadecimal, not binary. I do not see any benefit for websites storing things in hex instead of text. The overall savings you've pointed out it what, 2 bytes for every tag? Add this to the fact that most of us might just use 1 or 2 tags in our sig, and you can see why it's not practical.

Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 5th Mar 2009 11:07 Edited at: 5th Mar 2009 11:10
It is binary. I think the idea is that you use lower character values to represent these tags when stored in the database.

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 5th Mar 2009 16:44 Edited at: 5th Mar 2009 16:45
Quote: "It is binary. I think the idea is that you use lower character values to represent these tags when stored in the database."


0x03, 0x04 etc. is binary, eh?

I understand what he's saying, but my point was it would be too much work just to shave a few bytes here and there.

EDIT:

I assume when he said "binary" it's what he was referring to as the write mode. But I can assure you the examples he provided are obviously hex.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-06 12:38:14
Your offset time is: 2025-05-06 12:38:14