Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Michael Jackson is dead!

Author
Message
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 12:39
Quote: "Anyway, I don't believe it just yet. Everyone seems to be getting this from one particular website, whereas other sources are reporting him as in a coma."


This is why I didn't post last night and at my scepticism this morning, I checked on the BBC website and they've confirmed it.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8119993.stm

The BBC waited until they could get confirmation before other news sources jumped on it and spread the news, in other words they wanted to do some real journalism before copying what everybody else is saying and what was potentially a rumour. )


Michael Jackson was a legend in my books - it's sad to see a legend of a generation to die so soon, I was kind of interested to see if he had it in him for his up-coming performance. Think what you like of him, he was a talented man and entertained a generation skillfully. I sincerely doubt the child molestation claims are true.


Quote: "My point (while trying not to be insensitive) is that there are more important things in the news then yet another death... at least in my opinion.

He was an artist and will be missed, but we get nowhere holding our heads down."


I'd agree if the News milked the death of a famous person and they sometimes do and it is annoying, as you need to get over it. But famous people have fans, and it's perhaps fair to let people know that somebody very famous has died and people that liked that famous person can have some grief and have empathy for the friends and families that lost and when you respect somebody, you're going to care about them enough to be effected by their death, even if you've never met them. Obsessing over it on the other hand is just daft. If this went on for the next week or so, I'd be turning around and saying, "get over it, we know he's dead."

David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 12:47 Edited at: 26th Jun 2009 12:50
I have more sympathy for someone like MJ being covered on the news, mainly because he has actually had a significant cultural impact. He's been around a long time, and has some actual genuine talent (or at least, did at some point, I think it tapered off in later life, mainly because of his dependence on medication, and illnesses etc.) and hence a reason for being covered at all.

At least, he's vastly more worthy of news coverage than someone like Jade Goody - who did nothing of any importance what-so-ever (other than appearing in a reality TV show, and then making racist comments against an Indian woman. Oh, and then she got cancer - much like millions of other [normal] people across the world. Good causes for recognition there ) and did not deserve the glut of sympathy reporting that she received.

Also, I think being a music figure makes him more worthy of coverage in general. Auditory 'fragments' are a really big part of how we remember things - and being a long lasting artist across a big expanse of time means millions of people probably remember certain events coinciding with either his music or his releases etc. meaning he is important to them, and hence their memories of certain times.

09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
Grog Grueslayer
Valued Member
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th May 2005
Playing: Green Hell
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 13:17
The news does overdo it though. Over here in America many radio stations were only playing Michael Jackson songs and several shows that were marked to record on my DVR were replaced with shows about Michael Jackson. We'll all miss him but we are all suffering from Michael overload over here.

The same thing happened back when the space shuttle Challenger blew up (the one with the teacher on it). I was in 7th grade back then and every classroom had a TV with the shuttle blowing up over and over again all day. At home it was the same thing... every channel was playing the explosion over and over again... yes it's a tragic loss but the news media drilling it into our heads is just inhumane.

Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 13:30
I agree with you there David R. Though it's sad that Jade Goody died of cancer and I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy, but her time in the spotlight is insignificant and she wasn't particularly a good specimen of humanity, it seems strange that people say now that she is dead, that she was a good role model, whilst she faced cancer bravely, which can be inspiring, but she was not a good role model.

Michael Jackson is a significant cultural impact and probably will remain in the media for a while, but milking his death is just going to be disrespectful and I hope they respect Jermaine Jackson's request to leave him and his family alone.

Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 13:32
See there's a lot to be said for not reading newspapers, watching news programmes, or going outside. I haven't been bugged by it all day, I only noticed when I saw the paper headlines at the petrol station this morning.

I shouldn't really post my thoughts on the man/myth/freak, I'm more saddened by Farrah Fawcett's death, in fact I'm more saddened by my cola getting warm. No offense to fans of MJ, I just never took to the man, in fact he gave me the creeps from day 1.


Health, Ammo, and bacon and eggs!
Mr Z
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2007
Location:
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 13:38
No matter what I think of him as a person or his music, it is sad that such an artist now is dead. And so sudden.

There is no greater virtue, then the ability to face oneself.
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 13:53
VanB, I don't think anybody should be offended, after all if you don't care about him, then you don't have to be effected by his death.

Conversely I am unaffected by Farah Fawcett's death, because she's made no impact on me, though it is sad and I wish the best for family and friends, I find myself not particularly bothered. I never watched Charlie's Angels and that's the only thing I am aware she was famous for.

Raybrite2
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th May 2009
Location: Cyberspace
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 13:56
You were right about the news. We get 5 minutes on the hour. They covered MJ every hour and sometimes it took the whole program.
Not one mention of Farrah Fawcett who I though was much better looking.
Strelok
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Oct 2006
Location: In your cupboard.
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 14:23 Edited at: 26th Jun 2009 14:24
Another one bites the dust.. I guess his music will worth more now he is "dead" .
Samoz83
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd May 2003
Location: Stealing Ians tea from his moon base
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 17:22
Quote: "in fact he gave me the creeps from day 1."


Even when he was part of the Jackson 5
Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 19:48
Looks like the cause of the heart attack was food poisoning.



I was pretty upset about the coverage this was getting when there is some pretty crazy stuff going on in the world at the moment. Can not say I am in any way saddened by his death.

Looks like its not just me that thinks this



http://Flashsalsa.com
New Game site
Leon Kennedy
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Sep 2008
Location: Neither here nor there
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 19:58
Quote: "And no one mentioned Farrah Fawcett. Died of Cancer. "

Funny you should mention that. I was watching Entertainment Tonight last night, and the whole show was about Farrah Fawcett. They had like 30 seconds of "Michael Jackson is in the hospital!", and that was it. Kinda racist, don't ya think? Proof:

Farrah Fawcett - white, good looking blonde girl, in miraculous but losing battle with cancer

Michael Jackson - black male who, at one point, was on trial for pedophilia (not convicted, but on trial). Also was broke as heck and died of apparent cardiac arrest

Guess which one ET put on television last night? They both die on the same day, MJ gets almost zero coverage. And people wonder why white people are branded as racists.

Priest of the Church of Joe Wood

In memory of Nanee. 9/1/1993 - 5/16/2009. Rest in Peace, little girl.
Grandma
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Dec 2005
Location: Norway, Guiding the New World Order
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 20:02
I've never heard of Farrah Fawcett until reading this thread and I'm sick of her/him/it already.

This message was brought to you by Grandma industries.

Making yesterdays games, today!
Sid Sinister
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jul 2005
Location:
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 20:05
Quote: "And people wonder why white people are branded as racists."


Puh-lease.

"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants" - Isaac Newton
Current Project: http://strewnfield.wordpress.com/ (Last updated 06/11/09)
Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 20:07
Quote: "Guess which one ET put on television last night? They both die on the same day, MJ gets almost zero coverage. And people wonder why white people are branded as racists."


or of course the point that ET is not a live show it's pre-recorded and they thought Farrah was going to be the big news in the entertainment world that night. little did they know

http://Flashsalsa.com
New Game site
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 21:44
White people are branded racist since...when? If anybody claims that white people are racist are racist themselves and I don't think I've heard anybody claim it.

As for Farah vs MJ, how can you even claim it to be a race issue? Sure she's white and he was black. It means nothing.

Aertic
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Jul 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 21:57
His heart-Attack was probably when his nose dropped off...
He should've been used to it, I guess not...

Just kidding...

Sad to see him go, I was actually anticipating his come-back...


"Your greatest teacher is your harshest critic"-'Butterfingers'
Lemonade
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Dec 2008
Location:
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 22:06 Edited at: 26th Jun 2009 22:06
Michael who?

Meh.

Check out my tech blog below!
http://cooltech-sciencelab.blogspot.com/
Happy Cheesecake
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Jun 2009
Location: My non-vice-presidential refrigerator.
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 22:31
You guys want me banned but didn't even take notice to Hobgoblin Lord?...Meh...At least I liked his music. Although, he did creep me out.
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 22:35 Edited at: 26th Jun 2009 22:35
His post must have been missed. But it's a bit early for jokes isn't it?

Leon Kennedy
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Sep 2008
Location: Neither here nor there
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 22:39
Quote: "or of course the point that ET is not a live show it's pre-recorded and they thought Farrah was going to be the big news in the entertainment world that night. little did they know"

I don't think ET is pre-recorded. Just a guess here, but MJ died pretty late in the day yesterday, and ET comes on at 630 CDT. By the time I heard he was dead it was already 5 pm. If they pre-recorded the show, they wouldn't have mentioned him at all.

Priest of the Church of Joe Wood

In memory of Nanee. 9/1/1993 - 5/16/2009. Rest in Peace, little girl.
Grog Grueslayer
Valued Member
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th May 2005
Playing: Green Hell
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 22:39
Quote: "Guess which one ET put on television last night? They both die on the same day, MJ gets almost zero coverage. And people wonder why white people are branded as racists."


She died first so she was the lead story they worked on more. They aren't going to drop all the stuff they did just because a "more important" person dies later.

Inspire
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posted: 26th Jun 2009 23:32
That was just stupid, Leon Kennedy.

First of all, they were already talking about her. Second, Farah got like zero coverage because of the MJ thing. So why not talk about her? Was every other channel not enough coverage for ol' MJ?
Mr Z
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2007
Location:
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 00:21
Quote: "You guys want me banned but didn't even take notice to Hobgoblin Lord?...Meh...At least I liked his music. Although, he did creep me out."


I don´t want to ban you. Sure, may have been an inapropriate comment, but not enough for a ban in my opinion, not even close, lol.

There is no greater virtue, then the ability to face oneself.
Herakles
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Mar 2009
Location: Lost in my own head
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 02:13 Edited at: 27th Jun 2009 02:14
Quote: "I have more sympathy for someone like MJ being covered on the news, mainly because he has actually had a significant cultural impact."


That's a very cold thing to say. Just because he was famous means that you have more sympathy for Michael Jackson than for the innumerable amount of non-famous human beings who died on the planet Earth yesterday? Being famous doesn't make you any more human than those who aren't famous.

Swordfight! My cheesy little first game!
http://forum.thegamecreators.com/?m=forum_view&t=147808&b=36
Insert Name Here
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Mar 2007
Location: Worcester, England
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 02:18
Quote: "That's a very cold thing to say. Just because he was famous means that you have more sympathy for Michael Jackson than for the innumerable amount of non-famous human beings who died on the planet Earth yesterday? Being famous doesn't make you any more human than those who aren't famous."

In my opinion, someone who has entertained people and make an impact culturally is more worth remembering than someone who hasn't, but then I am cold hearted.

RIP Michael Jackson.

Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 02:34
Quote: "Jeku: He is as innocent as OJ."

Good to see the mods bringing the firelighters to this barbeque
I don't believe the child molesting accusation, I hate how stupid society is that all it takes is for one person to say something and it becomes instant fact! I remember when the Stars in Their Eyes host (forgot his name; Matthew something) was accused of rape by some tart and his reputation was totally destroyed for about a year because of it, even though she just made it up!

RIP Michael. I feel sorry for him, I think he would have lived a happier life had he not been famous at all.

TGC Forum - converting error messages into sarcasm since 2002.
xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 03:17
How many soldiers died in Afghanistan and Iraq yesterday? What were their names, and who did they leave behind? Who will tell of their lives and accomplishments? Where is their thirty minute video story. How many children died of hunger and disease around the world? Are they less important than Michael?

Every death is a tragedy, but it happens more than 100,000 times a day. I'll save my sorrow and respect for someone who means something to me.

If it sounds like I don't like him, it's not true. I don't know him. I'm just tired of the media trying to make some peoples lives more important than others.

Brian.

Alucard94
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jul 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden.
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 03:25
Quote: "How many soldiers died in Afghanistan and Iraq yesterday? What were their names, and who did they leave behind? Who will tell of their lives and accomplishments? Where is their thirty minute video story. How many children died of hunger and disease around the world? Are they less important than Michael?

Every death is a tragedy, but it happens more than 100,000 times a day. I'll save my sorrow and respect for someone who means something to me.
"

True indeed.


Alucard94, lacking proper intelligence.
Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 03:27
@xplosys
The reason celebrities' deaths get blown out of proportion by the media is because celebrities are creatures of the media. They're in the spotlight already, so when something happens to them it's much easier to sell newspapers than trying to build an interest in non-celebrities.

TGC Forum - converting error messages into sarcasm since 2002.
xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 03:55
I know the reason, I just don't like it.

@Alucard94,
Very good article. I really enjoyed it, thanks.

Brian.

Herakles
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Mar 2009
Location: Lost in my own head
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 03:58
> OBese87

That's another reason why I can't watch the news. It's all such BS.

Swordfight! My cheesy little first game!
http://forum.thegamecreators.com/?m=forum_view&t=147808&b=36
Venge
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Sep 2006
Location: Iowa
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 04:11
I was watching CNN in the waiting room before my surgery today, and the entire 30 minutes or so I saw was about Michael Jackson. Meanwhile the scrolling updates along the bottom read: Baghdad blast kills 15, dozens injured in train accident, droughts devastate crops in India.

At least they've got their priorities straight.


Black procession through the narrow aisles/Another's gone for all to see
Near the site for one who lost his trials/Sleeping 'neath the ground is me
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 06:31 Edited at: 27th Jun 2009 06:32
Quote: "Guess which one ET put on television last night? They both die on the same day, MJ gets almost zero coverage. And people wonder why white people are branded as racists."


Turn the TV or the radio on or grab *any* newspaper from today. It's all MJ. Your race issue is null and void. Next.

I'm going to dust the cobwebs off of the dual-CD History set and give it a listen today.

Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 10:23
Quote: "How many soldiers died in Afghanistan and Iraq yesterday? What were their names, and who did they leave behind? Who will tell of their lives and accomplishments? Where is their thirty minute video story. How many children died of hunger and disease around the world? Are they less important than Michael?

"


I can understand you sentiment xplosis, but the point is that people do like to know where their favourite famous person has died.

Though I find all deaths to be tragic, and see MJ's death to be no different to the tragic deaths of many others, I think when a person responsible for a cultural impact or has effected a good number of people, then their death should at least be reported, and from those who respect them, a tribute.

To milk it dry on the other hand? That's just blood thirsty and disrespectful, as no doubt the media will.

sp3ng
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Jan 2006
Location:
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 14:09
wow, i knew he died, but i didnt know exactly when and now i know that he died on my birthday

When Chuck Norris jumps in a pool, Chuck Norris doesnt get wet, wet gets Chuck Norris
lazerus
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2008
Location:
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:00 Edited at: 27th Jun 2009 15:03
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1245924926914

Quote: ""fire shower of nuclear retaliation" in the event of a US attack."


Why do people have little moral understanding, sure he was loved by many , but in the time it took me to write this post 500 people died globally. Tell me now why people wonder why i dont really care about a single man. Call me a self rightous emotinally insensitive Ba#####d. Heres a quick reasoning for persective

See A nuclear firestorm = ALL OF US DEAD
OR
One man who thinks hes peterpan saving little kids dies?
You tell me?

Wow am honestly surprised that people are that oblivious, arogant or just plain stupid.

Working it out roughly from G.D.NW. amnerica holds over 2000nukes. north korea plans to have 200nukes, and the rest is about 20,000 around the world.
To be honest itd only take 12 nukes to destroy the world as the fallout will do the rest. the other 22188 nukes are just overkill.

hell they do say ignorance is bliss, so slapping M.J on the news blinds people to the possible global destruction of US, Great plan...

-cb


Freedom has always had a price... Most will never know it, Some will pay your dept,
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:05
dark coder
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Oct 2002
Location: Japan
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:23
People who don't understand why the death of a famous person results in lots of media coverage are idiots.

Of course such people won't have the intellect to know what I'm talking about still so I'll explain! If an ant dies, who cares? No one, because this ant hasn't affected your life. If a pet dies, who cares? Its owner, as well as anyone else close to it, aka the ones whose lives it has affected. If a famous person dies, who cares? Everyone who has been affected by them, due to MJ being probably the most popular male pop singer to have ever lived and having entertained probably hundreds of millions of people for years with his music and what not, loads of people care. What happens when something in the world happens that loads of people care about? It gets reported in the news!

Chris K
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2003
Location: Lake Hylia
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:26
Quote: "To be honest itd only take 12 nukes to destroy the world as the fallout will do the rest"


It really depends what you mean by "destroy the world", but to produce the standard collapsed-buildings-red-sky scenario from films etc on a planet wide scale I think it would take more than the entire arsenal.

-= Out here in the fields, I fight for my meals =-
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:38 Edited at: 27th Jun 2009 15:39
The point is people DO CARE that people die everyday, but it's senseless to allow yourself to be effected by it, because we'd get nothing done. Hence the media rarely reports that.

A famous person has earn a name for themselves and a good number of people care about their death, not only that, they would like to know, right? It makes sense to report it.

IT DOESN'T HOWEVER MAKE ALL THOSE OTHER PEOPLE WHO DIE EACH DAY LESS IMPORTANT. It's when a well known person dies, the news of their death has to be made well known. It's logical.

As far as tribute stuff goes, people who have made an impact always do get a tribute, during and after their death. We get documentaries dedicated to Jimi Hendrix and we get ones dedicated to The Red Hot Chilli Peppers. We get tributes when the person dies too.

The only problem is that the media tend to milk it.

Mr Z
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2007
Location:
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:49
Quote: "Why do people have little moral understanding, sure he was loved by many , but in the time it took me to write this post 500 people died globally. Tell me now why people wonder why i dont really care about a single man. Call me a self rightous emotinally insensitive Ba#####d. Heres a quick reasoning for persective

See A nuclear firestorm = ALL OF US DEAD
OR
One man who thinks hes peterpan saving little kids dies?
You tell me?

Wow am honestly surprised that people are that oblivious, arogant or just plain stupid.

Working it out roughly from G.D.NW. amnerica holds over 2000nukes. north korea plans to have 200nukes, and the rest is about 20,000 around the world.
To be honest itd only take 12 nukes to destroy the world as the fallout will do the rest. the other 22188 nukes are just overkill.

hell they do say ignorance is bliss, so slapping M.J on the news blinds people to the possible global destruction of US, Great plan...

-cb"


Man, it is one thing to make ones mans death the most important thing in the world. But there is nothing wrong to find it sad that the man is dead. It has nothing to do with perspective, it has to do with the fact that people matter, even if it is just one person.

There is no greater virtue, then the ability to face oneself.
xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:52
Quote: "People who don't understand why the death of a famous person results in lots of media coverage are idiots."


I don't know of anyone who doesn't understand it. Just people who don't like it. Anyway, try to keep the discussion pertaining to the subject, and don't make it personal by calling others with differing points of view "idiots".

Brian.

Mr Z
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2007
Location:
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 15:57
Quote: "Anyway, try to keep the discussion pertaining to the subject, and don't make it personal by calling others with differing points of view "idiots"."



Agreed. A man is dead, lets be respectful and keep to the topic.

There is no greater virtue, then the ability to face oneself.
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 16:04
I don't see the reason to hate it, because it doesn't mean any disrespect to anybody and it doesn't mean the lesser-known man is not important.

lazerus
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2008
Location:
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 16:07 Edited at: 27th Jun 2009 16:08
Quote: "Why do people have little moral understanding, sure he was loved by many , but in the time it took me to write this post 500 people died globally. Tell me now why people wonder why i dont really care about a single man. Call me a self rightous emotinally insensitive Ba#####d. Heres a quick reasoning for persective

See A nuclear firestorm = ALL OF US DEAD
OR
One man who thinks hes peterpan saving little kids dies?
You tell me?

Wow am honestly surprised that people are that oblivious, arogant or just plain stupid.

Working it out roughly from G.D.NW. amnerica holds over 2000nukes. north korea plans to have 200nukes, and the rest is about 20,000 around the world.
To be honest itd only take 12 nukes to destroy the world as the fallout will do the rest. the other 22188 nukes are just overkill.

hell they do say ignorance is bliss, so slapping M.J on the news blinds people to the possible global destruction of US, Great plan...
"


hmmm I did just get a tad carried away.

sorry folks.

I understand the effect that he has on people, idolised ect.
I just seen redish and went for it.
sorry
As for the post apocalipic world



Freedom has always had a price... Most will never know it, Some will pay your dept,
dark coder
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Oct 2002
Location: Japan
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 16:09
Quote: "and don't make it personal by calling others with differing points of view "idiots"."


I didn't; understanding why the media publishes news about the death of famous people isn't an opinion.

Chris K
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2003
Location: Lake Hylia
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 17:53
Quote: "of my standards, as
inhabitial by human and other life, it would happen by 12 nukes,
fissionable material and 'rad winds' would do the rest, ands thats
assuming the nuke dosnt detonate another stockpile. Every state is
america has 2-20 bases here in britian am not too sure, the bases
are alot fewer since we have less of them. Long story short,
russia can destroy the world by your standards (the flat storm)
29-34 times america 27 and England 6."


I really, really don't think this is true.
I mean the most powerful nuclear bombs have blast radii of about 5km, with radiation maybe spreading 20km - and there are really not very many bombs that powerful.

It would take 1 or 2 bombs per city, I think.

-= Out here in the fields, I fight for my meals =-
Grandma
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Dec 2005
Location: Norway, Guiding the New World Order
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 18:12
I'm not an expert on nuclear bombs (let's say I'm not), but radiation can go far and wide. After the chernobyl incident, radation came across Norway. Not in any huge quantity, but I was born that year and look how I turned out. You don't want a planet full of Grandmas do you?

This message was brought to you by Grandma industries.

Making yesterdays games, today!
Travis Gatlin
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 27th Jun 2009 18:27 Edited at: 27th Jun 2009 18:34
its hard 2 believe MJ is dead! it is sad he only died at 50! it is unbelievable! well at least he wont have to pay off his debt
(i guess people dont care about farrah fawcett lol)

the modern government tries to make time,into money that is why clock are not free! in theory time is actually money!

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-31 19:35:32
Your offset time is: 2025-05-31 19:35:32