Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / [LOCKED] Why are the mods so tight?

Author
Message
Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 02:04
Sorry if you are a mod and you are not tight.

However, i think some of the mods are being quite unreasonable, for starters Tharaxas locked the ps3 or xbox thread, although there was nothing wrong with what was happening, in another thread about a banner competition, a mod disqualified an entry, because it won.

And in the DarkData thread, someone was banned, for asking questions on the encrytion.

WTF is going on?
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 02:15 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 02:15
It's called democracy...

(kidding)

thenerd
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Mar 2009
Location: Boston, USA
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 02:16
I personally don't think anything is wrong, just the mods doing their job.


forever loading...
Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 02:25
Mad Nightmare, Thraxas left a reason for his locking your PS3 and Xbox 360 thread! If you haven't decided which console to get send him an email and I'm sure he'll unlock it!

I don't know if you're aware but generally console threads turn into nothing more than flamebait. Also the mods aren't paid workers they're volunteers, and they do a damn good job of keeping this place clean and it's at their discretion to lock threads, ban people or slap 'em!

Plus they're all so experienced now, they can sniff trouble about 5 posts before it happens .

I hate to be rude but I count this post as SPAM you should have dealt directly with the MOD in question, Thraxas, by emailing him.


Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 02:27
i think your ignoring my other two points, fair enough , maybe thraxas was right to lock mine, but the other two are ridiculous
Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 02:50
Mad Nightmare there is a big difference between being banned and post-approval! Havok Delta was, as Ron explains, not adding constructively to the thread hence his posts were 'cleaned' up and he was given a warning noob slap. To be banned would not allow him to post anything whatsoever! As it also obvious Havok Delta didn't have a major problem and the thread continued nicely!

As to the second thread DarkCoder was turning the thread into nothing more then flamebait!


Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:02
Quote: "Havok Delta 6 Banned"


To quote Ron:

Quote: "If ANYONE has ANY problem with how any of this has been moderated, then e-mail me. I'll talk to you about it there. If you don't want to do that, then complain to support. Do NOT post here about it.
"


Seems he was wanting to keep a tight ship for the thread and it's possible...I've not seen any previous posts by Havok, but as Ron said, "I'm not playing this game" implies that Havok has played a game before and Ron was making a pre-emptive move by slapping him. Without knowing the user's previous posts, it's difficult to comment.

Maybe Daniel could explain his reasons for his one? That's what email is for.

Typically the mods are very good - yes, they keep a tight ship, but there's a good reason for that and it keeps this place a nice, friendly and clean place and well, it's managed to keep this place functional and popular. But what you must remember is that most mods are just like us, except they've volunteered and have been voted in as mods - they're not employed, they're not superior, and whilst they volunteer themselves a responsibility, at the end of the day, they're just as human and just as likely to make mistakes and misjudge things and this is why they ask if you think they've unfairly moderated something or someone, then email them - you might find a reasonable answer or that they simply made a mistake or that they think they made the right decision.


The PS3 or XBox 360 thread of course was because Thraxas pre-empted a console war and figured as the purpose of the thread came to an end, it was necessarily to lock, which you've already acknowledged as being fair, but it is perhaps something you could have asked him via email as opposed to making a thread about, hence, if we all started making threads asking for explanations, it'd get a bit messy in the Geek Culture area.

Ron Erickson
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:04 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 03:07
Quote: "Havok Delta 6 Banned"

Quote: "i think your ignoring my other two points, fair enough , maybe thraxas was right to lock mine, but the other two are ridiculous "


Mad Nightmare,
Havok was not banned for asking questions. He has been trolling on this forum since he joined a few short months ago. You don't see the approximately 50 posts that I had to delete from that thread because of him. I have no doubt that he was intending to the same again. I called him on it and he did alter his tone in that thread. I would have been fine with that but you also didn't see the e-mail where he threatened legal action if he was banned. I told him that his threat alone is grounds for being banned, but I was STILL willing to give him one last chance. He took my "one last chance" and threw it back in my face as being good that I heeded his warning. He also said I need to be as "nice" and "act like the other mods". So, I posted all of the information on the moderator forum. ALL of the other mods that have commented have agreed that he should have been banned for his history of actions. One of the other mods (not me) actually did ban him for a month. Hopefully he learns his lesson when/if he returns.

Bottom line is that you have NO IDEA what is behind some of the decisions that are made. You only see a small part of what happens. I understand that. I can also understand why you saw things from the perspective that you did. Just understand that ALL of us mods are just trying to keep the forums a nice place for everyone that visits. One bad apple can really rot the entire bunch. Sometimes it might seem like we act harshly or too quickly, but sometimes that might be because your not seeing the entire picture.

As for the PS3/Xbox360 thread, one of the things that you learn quickly as a mod is how to spot a thread that is about to go down hill and spiral out of control. Sometimes it is good to put it out of it's misery before it suffers.

As for the DarkCoder thing, I can't comment yet. I don't know anything about that.

Ron


a.k.a WOLF!
Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:06
Nicely put Seppuku! I also just want to point out one more item, and it comes directly from the AUP,

3.17 Our forums are moderated by both TGC employees and trusted non-paid members of the public who volunteer their services and time for the benefit of the community. By using our forums you automatically agree that they cannot be held personally responsible for any actions arising from these forums. You agree that moderators shall, at their discretion, determine what constitutes a violation of theses terms, along with generally accepted nettiqute standards, and can take action against those who voilate these rules.

In the end it's left up to the MODs to decide, if you have a problem with a MODS decision, then email them and they'll sort it out. They're actually quite reasonable you know...


Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:09
I think the mods are doing a fantastic job of keeping the forums clean. I'm rather glad they're as tough as they are, I've seen some forums where people can get away with virtually anything and no mods are ever present. As stated before, they have so much experience working on these forums that it seems they can sense trouble before it begins, which is awesome in my opinion.

Click the pic:
RedneckRambo
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2006
Location: Worst state in USA... California
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:12 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 03:25
Thraxas locked your thread because it was clear you already made a decision (it seemed so even before people suggested which console to get) and console threads just turn into flame wars.

The MODs are people too (except for Thraxas, he is only part person. I'm pretty sure he is part camel and robot as well.) People make mistakes. Though I haven't really seen them make any to be honest. But if you disagree, just understand that it's their opinion that a thread needs to be locked. They are generally right when a thread should be locked though.

If they didn't run a tight ship things would get out of control.

Signature's are stupid.
Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:14
Quote: "I would have been fine with that but you also didn't see the e-mail where he threatened legal action if he was banned."
I feel sorry for you Ron! Do you MODS get a few emails like that?

RedneckRambo
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2006
Location: Worst state in USA... California
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:16
Quote: "I feel sorry for you Ron! Do you MODS get a few emails like that?"

I talk to Thraxas on IM and on XBL and it seems like they get quite a fair share lol.

Signature's are stupid.
Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:18
Quote: "I talk to Thraxas on IM and on XBL and it seems like they get quite a fair share lol."
People probably don't realise that! MODS have to take a lot of crap and they don't get paid for it...

Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:21
That's really outrageous that some people have the nerve to threaten the mods like that. Take legal action against a mod if they ban you? Yeah...that'd work.

Sorry that happened to you Ron. You deserve a medal!

All I gots is this here beverage though:

Click the pic:
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:29 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 03:30
Quote: "I would have been fine with that but you also didn't see the e-mail where he threatened legal action if he was banned."


Judging from his comments on GCSEs, he lives in the UK, whilst there are sometimes stupid legal cases, from my understanding of things, banning somebody on a forum where by signing up you agreed to the AUP with the clause Darth Vader posted, no legal action would be possible.

So to me, it's laughable to offer such a threat. So I hope you spat out your coffee when reading that email...then again, why is it people always read and drink coffee at the same time? It just makes spitting coffee an inevitability.

Ron Erickson
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:43
Quote: "Sorry that happened to you Ron. You deserve a medal!"


It doesn't bother me at all. In fact, I thought it was pretty humorous. The last thing that I am going to do is get upset by someone that spends his time trolling on message boards.

Quote: "...in another thread about a banner competition, a mod disqualified an entry, because it won."


OK... just read that entire thread. Um... if you are seriously upset about that, then I have a hard time taking the rest of your questions seriously. The only mistake there is that the thread probably should have been locked sooner.


a.k.a WOLF!
Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:55
Quote: "The only mistake there is that the thread probably should have been locked sooner."
Agreed

Nickydude
Retired Moderator
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Nov 2006
Location: Look outside...
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 03:59
Quote: "I feel sorry for you Ron! Do you MODS get a few emails like that?"


You don't know the half of it! Mods walk a fine line between keeping this a nice open forum and stopping threads before they get out of hand. We try our best to judge which way a thread is going and take action appropriately.

Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 06:42 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 06:43
Quote: "except for Thraxas, he is only part person. I'm pretty sure he is part camel and robot as well."


It's true, this is me.

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 06:44
Quote: "Maybe Daniel could explain his reasons for his one? That's what email is for."


One read through the thread should make it very obvious why he did what he did. There are certain members of the forum who think it's funny to be childish, repeatedly, and need to be called out on it once in a while. Nothing new there


Senior Web Developer - Nokia
Neuro Fuzzy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Jun 2007
Location:
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 06:56 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 06:56
I don't think that there are any problems with the current moderators. Sometimes a post will get locked that (I think) didn't really have a problem, but that's rare, and it usually doesn't matter much anyways.

Quote: "It doesn't bother me at all. In fact, I thought it was pretty humorous. The last thing that I am going to do is get upset by someone that spends his time trolling on message boards."


O rly? So if that doesn't make you angry, what could i do t- ...wait, that's not a road i should go down
alec the lion
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jun 2006
Location:
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 10:18
Hey, I know i just got back, but I know Havok Via MSN and Skype, He's been teaching me PHP.

Ron just a quick query;

He Claims:

Quote: "
in capital letters at the bottom i stressed that this was not a threat that would imply legal action
"


And that the legal action was not for being banned, but for:
Quote: "
i only pointed out that consumer rights (the ability to ask questions about a products description) come above the powers granted by the AUP; and that the tgc would be very unlikly to take the blame should something actually come of it
"


And from the looks of the DarkData forum; if anything he got a post out of Steele which I find to be interesting and useful, I know understand the XOR Cypher.

Lastly, as someone pointed out above, you did say to email you if they have any problems, from what I understand he did.

He also claimed:
Quote: "
i hate mods that are all... "you do this else i do this" it makes you feel ... small, as a human i am more likly to disobey because of this. i have no fear of moderators (as oposed to teachers :p)

i pointed out this fact to him, and compaired him to the other mods, i like IanM, VanB and Castlerustler because they have always been (if anything) friendly, and kinda prompt you to avoid that rout, ron just hides behind the "i can do whatever the **** i want" clause, leading me to point out, that surpressing UK trade laws (trading standards) is something that CANNOT be covered by the AUP
"


If he is to be belived, what has he done wrong exactly? he took his dispute to email. and he asked decent questions.

I wont talk about the compettion thread, because; well whats the point, that is an old issue. But anyone who reads it, dont enter any TGC competition :p


Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 11:19
@alec the lion

I was the one who banned Havok, and it was for trolling. The banning had nothing to do with the email exchange between him and Ron.

If he still has questions abuot the product then being banned from the forums doesn't stop him obtaining the answers he seeks. He can send any queries directly to TGC.

If he has a problem with my banning of him, Mike Johnson has said to send all queries to him, so if Havok wants to he can do that.

Ron Erickson
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 11:23 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 11:29
Quote: "in capital letters at the bottom i stressed that this was not a threat that would imply legal action"


Haha! A person can't make a threat, then follow it with: "this is not a threat". It is like someone telling you: Give me all of your money. If you don't, I may or may not kill you. But I'm not threatening you.

Quote: "And from the looks of the DarkData forum; if anything he got a post out of Steele which I find to be interesting and useful, I know understand the XOR Cypher."

Yes. Because Steele was doing the smart thing as a user of this forum and the author of his plugin to not get involved with Havok's trolling attempts. There is more to that than you know and I will just leave it at that.

Quote: "Lastly, as someone pointed out above, you did say to email you if they have any problems, from what I understand he did."

Yes. I did. And I explained to him why he was wrong from my perspective. Him "warning" me did nothing to change my opionion on the type of user that he is.

Quote: "i hate mods that are all... "you do this else i do this" it makes you feel ... small, as a human i am more likly to disobey because of this. i have no fear of moderators (as oposed to teachers :p)"

Well, if he followed the forum rules, then there wouldn't be a problem. The truth is that I warned him against his actions REPEATEDLY. He failed to listen to my warnings. I newbie slapped him once. That is all I ever did to him.

Quote: "i pointed out this fact to him, and compaired him to the other mods, i like IanM, VanB and Castlerustler because they have always been (if anything) friendly, and kinda prompt you to avoid that rout, ron just hides behind the "i can do whatever the **** i want" clause, leading me to point out, that surpressing UK trade laws (trading standards) is something that CANNOT be covered by the AUP"

Funny. Like I said. The only thing that I ever did to him is warn him and slap him once (and it was well deserved). He still felt that I was treating him unfairly. So, I decided to no longer deal with him. I posted some of his past behaviors and the e-mail correspondence that we had on the moderator forum. I didn't ask any of the other mods to ban him. They took action based on the information. ALL mods that commented were in agreement about it.

I hope Havok returns with a new attitude. I think he is a bright kid and could potentialy be very helpful and constructive on these forums. Unfortunatley, so far, his attitude has wiped that away.


a.k.a WOLF!
dark coder
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Oct 2002
Location: Japan
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 12:23
Quote: "Darkcoder disqualified"


I was disqualified from a competition I didn't enter?

kaedroho
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Aug 2007
Location: Oxford,UK
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 12:34
Quote: "And in the DarkData thread, someone was banned, for asking questions on the encrytion."


Havok Delta 6 was trolling. He wouldnt stop argueing about how much better mysql is and totally blew the thread off topic. His posts were deleted though.

Kravenwolf
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Apr 2009
Location: Silent Hill
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 12:44
Quote: "Why are the mods so tight?"


They have to be...have you seen some of the threads people start around here?


Kravenwolf

Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 12:46
Quote: "I was disqualified from a competition I didn't enter?"

I found that fact out as well! Quite humorous actually...

alec the lion
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jun 2006
Location:
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 13:26
Quote: "
Quote: "Now would you please leave posts of mine that YOU deleted out of this, you know we'll get into an argument, you're perpetuating it, Why would you not just let Steele answer the question, its his brainchild. "

Um.. No. I won't. I deleted posts of yours because you were trolling in this thread. I haven't forgot about it because you have continued to do the same in other threads. I can not help but be skeptical that your intentions in this thread are AGAIN trolling. I'm not perpetuating anything. I'm doing my job as a moderator of this forum. Do you think I LIKE babysitting you? Frankly, my patience has run out with you and your a click away from being gone.
If Steele would like to answer you, that is up to him. I know that I wouldn't bother to help your "curiosity".
"

Quote: "
After all the problems you have already tried to cause in this thread, why would anyone go at all out of their way to answer ANY of your questions?
"

Quote: "
What is that supposed to mean? Let me guess, just another swipe at TGC, DBpro and this plugin? You, again, are just trying to cause problems.
"


why do you assume that? DBP is very high level, and its not that hard to poke into its memory and see what its up to because its that high level. its high-levelness is also the reason why it cant acheive decent encryption it cant handel stuff at a binary level - as was stated in the critique of darkbasic thread by me, and answered by VanB

Quote: "
Joined: Wed Jun 14th 2006
Location: Cyberspace Posted: 13th Oct 2009 02:20 | link | toggle


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey guys, Been away an awful long time; but I have not stoped using darkbasic.

The main, really big problem I have with it lies with "files"

1) We cannot write to files that exist (else the command fails)
2) We (therefore) can't Append to the end, or overwrite parts of the file
3) We cannot use it's pointer.
4) Reading them is done line by line.


I've found no way around this yet, but DarkBasics File support is Awful. I have had many projects die at this supposedly simple problem,

Another thing which you have mentioned and I will back you up on is that:

You can only return one generic type back from a function (string, float, integer) and type or array support would be very much apreciated over here




Back to top

Van B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moderator


Joined: Tue Oct 8th 2002
Location: The Swan. Posted: 13th Oct 2009 02:35 | link | toggle


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds to me like your after binary access to the file. To be honest I avoid that in all languages so have no idea what DBPro is like for it.

But there are some more in-depth features through memblocks, I know people hate the word work-around, but really making your own file access system via memblocks might be worth your while.

"


another thing you took wrong
Quote: "
In closing, I find cryptography interesting, I am sure others do to, and -100 points to whomever says "but isn't a hash a form of encryption" BECAUSE ITS NOT :p

~Havok

Anyway Steele, please do explain this Xor algorytham, i didn't really get the wiki page. but as i have said, i do find this interesting.

[edit]
when i said "we can not even do hash's i was refferring to Darkbasics lack of non-standard operators. as required to create a hash, wiki md5-checksum for example.
"


Havok saw this limitation and stated it.

So far other then the nasty typo's i really cant see what he did wrongly.

Also thanks to a search engines cache I have seen the MySQL comments, and i've been following the forum.

Athough he ripped DarkData alot, he was not abusive to anyone; he was just very forward in his questions, He does have experance (as DarkCoder said) in this area so in that sense his comparassions or question about how they compair (as database systems) may be relivant. for example the SQL syntax, way of storing stuff, you just seemed focused on the fact that one supported networking.

Anyway must dash now. Laters Dudes



You're mean and being quite a bully there Ron, no one asked weather or no you would bother, but you added it anyway. you feel some duety to babysit him.... you're mocking him he asked a reasonable question to steele,


Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 13:42
Quote: "You're mean and being quite a bully there Ron, no one asked weather or no you would bother, but you added it anyway. you feel some duety to babysit him.... you're mocking him he asked a reasonable question to steele,
"


Now you are trying to start something! If you have a problem a problem with the way Havok was moderated then either email me, the mod who actually took action against him, or as I stated earlier contact Mike Johnson. You can get his email from the link I provided earlier.

This is not going to turn into your thread to attack Ron or any other moderator.

Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 14:12
I will agree that the mods sometimes can be a little harsh or annoying (I recently emailed Nickydude asking why I got slapped and have had no reply) But they must have a pretty tough time. I don't even wanna know what the unapproved posts look like
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 15:16
It's not unapproved posts that cause trouble, these days we rarely see a post that we won't approve - it's posts from people who are past the post approval timeframe that we have to watch for .

At the end of the day it's been said several times, not even moderators have the full picture of what went down in that thread because so many posts were deleted - we'd have to tredge through them, and that's only an option if you second guess yourself. Nobody here is second-guessing, no moderator disagrees with the decision to ban. He was banned for good reason, if that wasn't the case then we'd speak up. When we think that a moderator has gone too far, or when we might have gone too far ourselves, we discuss it - and having the rest of the mod team agree with your action puts it to bed in these situations. We have to trust our instincts, and we have to trust that the other mods will speak up if we are out of line. Users do not see the whole picture because we usually have to clean up after trolls.

Personally I think we ban in the hope that they come back with a better attitude, sadly that rarely happens and we're often left with 1 option, and that's more like a drop kick than a ban because at that stage we don't want them back. We hope that he comes back with the potential and attitude to get stuff done, we might be a grumpy lot sometimes but we don't bare grudges, how a user returns to the forum is up to them.


Health, Ammo, and bacon and eggs!
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 15:45 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 15:55
Dude, Havok could still make criticisms and bring up queries. He had his consumer rights and he still does. He can contact TGC and he used to be able to bring it up on the forums. Being banned doesn't hinder his consumer rights, just the privilege to use the forum, remember usage of the forum is a privilege and not a right. If it were to come to legal action, favour would be FOR TGC.

Because when signing up, you agree to the Acceptable Usage Policy, which includes the clause that a moderator is able to act by their own discretion on what violates the AUP. By using this forum, Havok should have known that if a moderator believes his behaviour breaks the AUP, then they have every right to act. They interpreted his posts as trolling, after all, he was addressed, but continued, slapped, but continued and was then banned as a result. Action is taken when people persist doing something the mods ask them not to do something.

Judging from what I read, none of the posts deleted were 'queries' about the product but trolling, Ron seems to have left the queries in. In a way I felt to begin with they carried the "MySQL does this better attitude", which I'd interpret as spam because if I were to go to the Blitz3D forum and asked, "why should I buy this? Look, DBP does this better than Blitz and well, it has features like this etc." That's my interpretation and well, there was also the claim from someone else that comparing the 2 was Apples and oranges, as the 2 products serve different purposes, perhaps this should have been addressed? Because if the statement is true, then you can't really persist with a debate of, "but MySQL has this", perhaps like my coming here to talk about Torque and its 'superiority' to DBP, it'd be irrelevent as despite being for game creation, they're not all that comparable. Perhaps Ron could shed light on what the content of the posts he deleted actually were?


But like I said, no consumer rights are broken, because, for a start, TGC barely visit threads, it's mostly forum member and mods, queries, issues, problems etc. can all be dealt with via email, which is freely available. The forum isn't the place to have TGC deal with consumer issues, it is to discuss various things based on the topic of each section and the topic of each thread.

Ron Erickson
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 15:50
I'll say it one more time.

Havok only joined this forum in late August of this year. In his brief stay here, he has already compiled a history of trolling. I have no doubt that he was heading down that path AGAIN - until I called him on it. He asked me to FORGET about his previous posts, but it is my responsibility as a mod to REMEMBER the type of user that he is, until he PROVES otherwise. All I did was WARN him. He then left a warning for me through e-mail. He also asked me to leave him alone. So, I responded that I would leave him alone and presented all of the information to the other mods to review. This led to ANOTHER mod banning him. ALL mods were in agreement about his intnetions in that thread. ALL mods were in agreement about his history of problems. ALL mods were in agreement in how he was punished.

Quote: "Also thanks to a search engines cache I have seen the MySQL comments"

Sure you have

Quote: "You're mean and being quite a bully there Ron, no one asked weather or no you would bother, but you added it anyway. you feel some duety to babysit him.... you're mocking him he asked a reasonable question to steele,"


While that sentence barely makes any sense, from what I can tell you are calling me mean and a bully. Boo-freak'n-hoo. If users like Havok see me as a bully, then it is probably because I am doing my job. If you want to let him drag you down too, well I guess that is up to you. I'm done discussing this now. As Thraxes mentioned, if you have any problem with the way this has been moderated, then contact Mike. Otherwise, the situation is OVER.

Ron


a.k.a WOLF!
Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 16:48 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 16:50
This thread is beginning to become into an excuse for people to have a dig at MODS. Mad nightmare's questions were answered I think people should leave it alone now!

alec the lion
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jun 2006
Location:
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 18:00
Its not, its our chance really for us to question the Mods and get there justification, We now have a new development.

Quick point to Ron

Find me any posts where you have not been derogatory or mean to Havok
everything you say involves him being harsh, or wrong, or too curious.

Building on that.
He knows that on the forums any disgussion with you is invalid because you dont listen, this has been established; So to level the playing field he uses email.

right good so far.

He is positive in the emails, giving a warning of what you were threating to do YOURSELF (ban him for asking questions again regarding DarkData)
And giving you tips to improve (all you have done is put him down, or have some sarcky little dig at him, knowing he cant retaliate)

What do you do?

On the DarkData forum he added something like
Quote: "
[edit]
Ron Check your e-mail, but please dont bring it here
"


You then:

Quote: "
I posted some of his past behaviors and the e-mail correspondence that we had on the moderator forum.
"


there are two problems with that

1) you posted "his" emails on a forum - even though he asked not to, and did it external to the forum (thus biasing any decisions a third party mod would make)

2) you cant show they are actually from him

Now you can say "yeah I can use screenshots" all you like, but thats not how a mail relay works, its a relay, you could have faked it for all the others know, they only have your word to take, like the reverse of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" you clearly dont like Havok, you are always mean to him - hence my bullying comment.

So you cant proove those mails are from him.

You then claim that you "newbie slapped" him, so he's already been punished, and 1 month later (or whatever) it is decided that he must be punished again.

Quote: "
to FORGET about his previous posts, but it is my responsibility as a mod to REMEMBER the type of user that he is, until he PROVES otherwise
"


He's a troll right?

Now a troll by accepted definition wants to cause arguments, arguments on issues which dont have a sollution, or to put down someones work or whatever. to be mean.

Can you demonstrate a mean post by Havok, that is actually mean.

So far his MySQL ones - was more of a debate, neather side had any harm, and forward definite and "black and white" (no mid ground) questions were asked.

Same with other forums. He's also tried to help.

His first post here, was typo covered, but it WAS A STEP BY STEP GUIDE ON HOW TO GET MYSQL TO WORK WITH DARKBASIC

He's also written an explode function mirror from PHP to split strings.

He's also written an incomplete SQL system in darkbasic, other users (like myself) can / did learn alot about parsing strings from this, as well as SQL (ish) and we got a get and put data alternative to DarkData - for free.

So; from my perspective, as someone third party; all you have done is be derogatory, as i stated and quoted in my last post; you also said "email me about it" when you cleaned it up last time.

He did, nothing came of it, according to him you basically said "well that tough" you just did it for brownie points - knowing nothing would ever posibly come of it.

So you say that you will leave Havok alone, another mod punishes him for old comments that he was alread "newbie slapped" for;

Now if the emails were accounted for and he wasnt punished twice for the same thing; i put the following to you:

by Thraxax (or something)
Quote: "
@alec the lion

I was the one who banned Havok, and it was for trolling. The banning had nothing to do with the email exchange between him and Ron.

If he still has questions abuot the product then being banned from the forums doesn't stop him obtaining the answers he seeks. He can send any queries directly to TGC.

If he has a problem with my banning of him, Mike Johnson has said to send all queries to him, so if Havok wants to he can do that.
"


Now if Havok does send posts to Mike, What will come of it, why cant Mike just read this thread; Please answer these questions and remember (Ron dont throw your ""this is not a threat". It is like someone telling you: Give me all of your money. If you don't, I may or may not kill you. But I'm not threatening you" comment)

I am not attacking moderators, just this is really unfair, If you would rather I choose a different case, i draw you to Nightmare's second example, read that forum;

Thanks for your time.

Lastly / Ps Dont lock this forum under flaming, I am trying to hold a sensible disgussion into your methods, I am not attacking Ron, Or any other mod.
Also, please, Dont lock it and hide behind "We dont have to justify ourselves" Socially that will make me into a marter for my argument (statement, but it is formally called an argument) and I just want to establish; that this community is better then it so far seems since my return.

Thanks


Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 18:28 Edited at: 15th Oct 2009 18:29
Quote: "disgussion"


Discussion.

First off, how many times does Ron have to say that it wasn't him who banned Havok? He said (very clearly) that he brought it to the moderator forums to get an opinion, and to see how Havok should be dealt with. He wasn't personally out to get Havok like you're trying to imply, he was simply doing his job: keeping the forums clean.

He deleted the trolling posts that Havok posted, so of course you can't see them. Trying to say that you "don't see why Havok was punished" is rather redundant and obvious. DELETED posts are no longer visible!

And I recommend not messing with the mods or arguing with them. Just sayin'.

Sorry Ron, Van B and Thraxas (and any other mod that posted in this thread), I'm just tired of people putting you guys down, so I felt this post necessary.

Click the pic:
JLMoondog
Moderator
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jan 2009
Location: Paradox
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 18:34
If I was a mod, I would have already locked this thread.


Monk
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Sep 2008
Location: Standing in the snow =D
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 18:36
Quote: "Socially that will make me into a marter for my argument "




In which Social circles???

Mike Johnson
TGC Developer
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 15th Oct 2009 18:41
This thread is going nowhere so I'm locking it.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-25 20:12:51
Your offset time is: 2025-05-25 20:12:51