Quote: "1. The game is not bad, it just is not realistic."
Now on this topic I could rant for a week.
Let me ask a question: What is the point of realism in games (excluding graphics)?
If you want a realistic game, you would therefore like this version of MW3:
-Weapons will need to be cleaned after each usage, can jam and the player will not be able to modify them anymore as they are property of the US Army.
-Snipers must find a partner who has to sight targets for them and calculate the optimal setup regarding weather, air pressure and the coriolis force.
-After each round soldiers have to write a protocol, help the population with getting food and medics for them and rebuilding their houses.
-Higher ranked players will not fight anymore but will sit infront of a screen showing the fight and will give tips and information to the soldiers.
-Every weapon except the M4, the M16 and the m9 are removed as US Army soldiers rarely use other guns.
-Picking up the enemies weapons is not aviable anymore as it is not allowed due to the laws of war.
-Air Support will need to travel to the fighting spot form the air base which takes 10-15 minutes each. In addition to that on populated areas airstrikes will not be allowed.
- After prestiging the players will be retired.
- After each match players will be forced to play a 2 hours funeral for their fallen comrades.
- etc.
Now, THAT game sounds like FUN!
Well, not really.
Yes you do need to have a standard sense of realism such as having guns that have reasonably sized magazines, running speed, things like that. But the day there is a game where every bullet is a kill is a game that I will never buy.
Your signature has been erased by a mod - Please reduce it to 600x120 maximum size