Your an idiot for copy/pasta, which it most likely is.
That and you seem to not understand much about what tidal energy is.
Ill put this the easy way since well being a geograpghy student ive had the terms bashed into me and; Could, /Have/ argued energy sources for hours.
Kick it off then. Tidal power is not predictable, far off it in fact. The tide's depth, power, silt level and solution of silt and other factors, are very unpredictable. This has lead to offshore tidal power being near impossible, especially in high season since we cant actually make anything that can take the waves barrages. Quite alot of the prototypes having been damamged beyound repair.
Then thiers the enviromental factors which nobody mentions.
Quote: "
This creates a cleaner environment for the future generations. "
I found this quite funny,
the enviroment around the station will be so clean that 80% of wildlife will be extinct. Thats based off the river mersy's plan on tidal power. (Liverpool, England) The areas would be flooded along with large silt deposits building up cauing port traffic to stop due to the shallow waters.
I can fling 10 or more case studies your way in which all of these plants have caused an large enviromental disaster of sorts but i dont have the time and patience to rewirte a 30pg case study booklet we created on it.
Im not denying its free energy in a sense its pollutent free, but the cost to everything else is astronomical.
I hate one sided arguments, so i thought id inform people before they vote it through. Which this is most likly a ploy to do.