Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Automatic complaint generator....

Author
Message
wizard of id
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Jan 2006
Location: Sunny South Africa
Posted: 20th May 2010 13:47
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
I wanted to post this message in a serious manor,but with the flaming going on, perhaps it is not such a good idea.

Most people probably think they already know all they need to know about TGC, but I have some new information to bring to light. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I wish only that TGC had the same intellectual honesty.

Because it's now in fashion and touches everyone's heart, TGC is always talking about the welfare of our children. But that doesn't stop it from wanting to convince others that self-pitying crackpots are the "chosen people" of scriptural prophecy. Nor does it negate my claim that I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with TGC. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I spread the word about its cocky, smarmy expedients to our friends, our neighbors, our relatives, our co-workers—even to strangers.

I'm not in the habit of giving advice to TGC's addlepated understrappers. However, there's always a first time: You guys should stop agitating for indoctrination programs in local schools. I admit I don't have much confidence that they'll follow that advice, but it's important to make it known that I have some of TGC's writings in front of me right now. In one of them, TGC maintains that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. If you don't find that shocking then consider that TGC finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, TGC is doing everything in its power to make me die a slow and painful death. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance.

We should agree on definitions before saying anything further about TGC's drugged-out histrionics. For starters, let's say that "McCarthyism" is "that which makes TGC yearn to threaten our core values, allegiances, and beliefs." Now, it is not my purpose to suggest that it is difficult for many people to accept that the fallout from TGC's rancorous asseverations has been an increasingly predatory environment of calculation, scheming, and pandering that will, by virtue of its omnipresence, pursue a mephitic agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever but rather to keep TGC's flunkies at bay. TGC's most cold-blooded tactic is to fabricate a phony war between hate-filled, irascible big-labor bosses and the most self-righteous survivalists you'll ever see. This way, it can subjugate both groups into helping it cause a marked deterioration in our literature, amusements, and social conduct. I unmistakably don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that ignorance is bliss. This may be why TGC's assistants are generally all smiles.

TGC twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. TGC unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what it claims gives it the right to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that it purportedly aims to save. I would never take a job working for TGC. Given its chauvinistic ideals, who would want to? The facts are, succinctly, these: First, whenever TGC claims that the moon is made of green cheese, I can't help but think that it has just subtracted from the sum of human knowledge. Second, most of TGC's writings are thesis-less runarounds that leave the reader unclear as to both its point and its position on the issue. To say anything else would be a lie. It seems to me that TGC is both subhuman and biased. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one.

TGC yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for TGC, "attract attention" usually implies "keep us perennially behind the eight ball". Perhaps TGC has some sound arguments on its side, but if so, it's keeping them well hidden; all the arguments I've heard from it are totally disgusting. TGC is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside itself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of its wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. I don't know what sort of abuse TGC was subjected to as a child that made it such a pusillanimous, poxy weirdo but I do know that unbridled, doctrinaire schmoes (also known as TGC's vassals) are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that I can reword my point as follows. TGC should not be allowed to operate heavy machinery, specifically, its ego.

While everybody believes in something, TGC's simple faith in cynicism will undoubtedly allow federally funded research to mushroom into a rambunctious, grossly inefficient system, hampered by pouty sandbaggers and brusque, rash bozos. TGC claims to have data supporting its assertion that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Naturally, it insists that it can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that it's hiding something. Maybe it's hiding the fact that its holier-than-thou attitudes are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I create greater public understanding of the damage caused by its personal attacks, TGC's invariant response is to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character.

By allowing TGC to make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely self-aggrandizing we are selling our souls for dross. Instead, we should be striving to wage war on pauperism. When a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that TGC stubbornly refuses to own up to its mistakes serves only to convince me that it demands that its wisecracks be discussed in only the most positive light. To ensure that this demand is met, TGC sends its coalition of inerudite lowlifes and featherbrained schnorrers after anyone who fails to show the utmost deference when planting big, wet, sloppy kisses on TGC's behind. If TGC feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing it, then that's just too darn bad. Its arrogance has brought this upon itself.

Now stay with me a moment here; I am making a point. Specifically, in asserting that principles don't matter, TGC demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. You might say, "TGC's anecdotes remain opaque to many observers who dismiss TGC on the basis of its reckless doctrines and general lunacy." Fine, I agree. But it would be wrong to imply that TGC is involved in some kind of conspiracy to drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. It would be wrong because its canards are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but the net effect of its perorations will be a generation of kids who are unable to read, write, or distinguish good from evil. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: It has warned us that sometime soon, the worst sorts of frowsy goof-offs there are will render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. If you think about it, you'll realize that its warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that this view dangerously underestimates the unenlightened quality of autism. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that one of history's clearest lessons is that TGC goes ballistic every time I so much as hint that it may be helpful to take a step back and expose some of its muzzy-headed deeds?

From what I know of TGC's ethics, it is saying essentially three things:

1. It's inflexibly honest, thoroughly patriotic, and eminently solicitous to promote, in all proper ways, the public good.
2. Bumptious good-for-nothings should be given absolute authority to violate its pledge not to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to create a TGC-centric society in which disdainful, repulsive prevaricators dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes.
3. The rules don't apply to TGC.

Obviously, all three of these are indeed noxious. Now that I've told you what I think, let me end this letter by stating that I fully intend to point out the glaring contradiction between TGC's idealized view of ruffianism and reality. Let TGC tremble. And though the heavens fall, let there be justice.

"In my weird politically incorrect hypothetically incoherent contradicting obscured world definitively maybe"

David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 20th May 2010 14:37 Edited at: 20th May 2010 14:42
.....


What?

I'm guessing this is supposed to be some kind of a weird joke? Because if it is, it has some amusing points (dragging from beds and castration blamed on TGC, for example) but it is far too verbose and serious-sounding. In fact it's so serious sounding it is difficult to tell whether it is a joke or whether you are just completely insane

EDIT: Ahh right. Should have actually checked the capabilities of the linked complaint generator. I didn't expect it to be capable of generating paragraphs of complaints

Quote: "We must penetrate the sunny façade of TGC's doctrines with the sharpened stick of reality"


Ha ha

09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
lazerus
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2008
Location:
Posted: 20th May 2010 15:39 Edited at: 20th May 2010 15:40
That is epic...

Quote: "I could write a very angry letter right now about Bro. Jhon The Pervert, but I decided instead merely to express some constructive criticism. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Jhon's untoward indoctrination and is consequently believable. There's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I warrant, there's a time to work together in an atmosphere of friendship and hope. Or, to put it less poetically, in public, Jhon vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Jhon never fails to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful. The only way out of Bro. Jhon The Pervert's rat maze is to carve solutions that are neither daft nor malodorous. It's that simple."


Just replace the names with random insults. Tis fun.

Good find!

Shadowtroid
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Dec 2009
Location: nope
Posted: 20th May 2010 15:52
Oh that is awesome.

wizard of id
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Jan 2006
Location: Sunny South Africa
Posted: 20th May 2010 18:00
The problem is what the end result would have been had I been serious.

"In my weird politically incorrect hypothetically incoherent contradicting obscured world definitively maybe"

Darth Vader
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th May 2005
Location: Adelaide SA, I am the only DB user here!
Posted: 20th May 2010 18:26
It's funny what it can come out with,


I wanted to respond to Apple earlier, but I was so busy, I simply did not have the time. Nevertheless, what I need to say is so important, I knew I simply had to allocate a few minutes to write a brief letter on the subject. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: Apple intends to create a new social class. Vile, vainglorious stuffed shirts, anti-democratic bozos, and shameless blatherskites will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their jackals. Now, I don't want to overwork the story about how Apple plans to sentence more and more people to poverty, prison, and early death, so let's just say that my cause is to treat the disease, not the symptoms. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that we must expose the connections between the cuckoo problems that face us and the key issues of imperialism and allotheism. Only then can a society free of its self-serving practices blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that its lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of expositions. Others are in the form of remonstrations. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion.

It is becoming increasingly obvious to many people that Apple's press releases are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Apple's ill-natured allocutions, but it loves generating drama and conflict. That's why Apple repeatedly insists that laws are meant to be broken. It's also why it believes in causing the destruction of human ambition and joy.

There is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Apple and its co-conspirators started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that it would be grossly premature for Apple to claim final victory. That conclusion is not based on some sort of insensate philosophy or on Apple-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that some of my acquaintances express the view that love of one's neighbor is contrary to Apple's principles. Others express the view that Apple's repugnant ipse dixits induce paralysis of the cerebrum. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of Apple to warrant a full three cheers. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call it by name. That name is Apple.

BearCDP
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Sep 2009
Location: NYC
Posted: 20th May 2010 20:50 Edited at: 20th May 2010 20:50
Rofl, my ex had been posting dramatic notes about our breakup (not saying anything disparaging, just kept awkwardly posting about it), so for a joke I posted a generated complaint letter about her and within an hour I recieved the ANGRIEST phone call I have ever received.

Check out this WIP flash game from the Global Game Jam!
wizard of id
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Jan 2006
Location: Sunny South Africa
Posted: 20th May 2010 21:07
yeah that is the way to do it... lol

"In my weird politically incorrect hypothetically incoherent contradicting obscured world definitively maybe"

Travis Gatlin
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 22nd May 2010 00:52
HAHAHA! I love that! Here's my complaint:



Google.com. Nuff Said
zeroSlave
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Jun 2009
Location: Springfield
Posted: 22nd May 2010 01:13
This is pretty clever! I love how it comes out differently each time.

Here is one generated about me:



This would be handy if someone was leaving a job and wanted to write some wordy complaint letters to the boss about the job, or the boss him/herself!

My green thumb grew the tree my Trojan War horse was crafted from. With roses in our pockets we rally round the tombstones. Ashes to ashes, we all fall down.
xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 22nd May 2010 01:30 Edited at: 22nd May 2010 01:35
I was having a terrible time following the Wizards logic, but then I substituted the words "the government" for TGC and everything made perfect sense.

Peter H
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Feb 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posted: 22nd May 2010 01:36
I am writing this letter in simple English in order that everyone can read and understand my words. Before I begin, let me point out that the first response to this from Wizard of Id's hangers-on is perhaps that we have too much freedom. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: Some people think it's a bit extreme of me to put Wizard of Id's logorrheic stratagems to the question—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that there is indeed an effrontive dimension to Wizard of Id's antics. Or, if "effrontive" is too narrow of a term, perhaps you'd prefer "shabby". In any case, in order to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them we must tamp down any doubts that he is a black-belt master of Comstockism. And that's just the first step. Remember, if Wizard of Id had done his homework, he'd know that I must ask that his companions invite all the people who have been harmed by Wizard of Id to continue to express and assert their concerns in a constructive and productive fashion. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality.

Whenever I turn around I see Wizard of Id bringing ugliness and nastiness into our lives. To deny such a truth would be to deny the evidence of our own senses. He focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, Wizard of Id attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings, but that just goes to show that he was an apolaustic ninny when we first encountered him. He's an apolaustic ninny now. And there is no more reason for believing that he will ever cease to be an apolaustic ninny than there is for supposing that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have.

If I had to choose between chopping onions and helping Wizard of Id make us dependent on unrestrained ragamuffins for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why Wizard of Id publicly disavows his ties to jujuism while secretly encouraging his compeers to rewrite and reword much of humanity's formative works to favor particularism. My peers profess that while I cannot judge his heart, Wizard of Id's actions sincerely appear socially inept. While this is definitely true, I assert we must add that Wizard of Id proclaims at every opportunity that his mission is to trade fundamental human rights for a cheap "guarantee" of safety and security. I'll go further: If you think you can escape from his deluded adages, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Wizard of Id's jaundiced zingers. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how Wizard of Id claims that he is a model citizen. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing fetish and a heroin habit.

Wizard of Id's main regret is that he didn't live in the early Soviet Union, where he could have joined the Cheka and organized mass shootings of dissidents in the cellars of the secret police. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Wizard of Id in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that in a vain effort to exculpate himself, Wizard of Id has been proclaiming to the world that he has done no wrong. Rather, it was his worshippers who have been needling and wheedling the most destructive New Age dunderheads you'll ever see into his den of thieves. I suppose the next thing he'll have us believe is that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel.

My only goal in writing this letter and others concerning Wizard of Id is to educate the public on a range of issues. Am I aware of how Wizard of Id will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because he decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that Wizard of Id fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. It is a dangerous folly to ignore the threat to democracy posed by licentious vendors of jingoism. To fully understand that, you need to realize that Wizard of Id follows a dual code of morality—one morality for his fellow inhumane liars and cheats and another for the rest of the world. This is why he has long been sending children to die as martyrs for causes that he is unwilling to die for himself. What worries me more than that, however, is that if Wizard of Id ever manages to blitz media outlets with faxes and newsletters that highlight the good points of his mephitic ebullitions, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning.

I can surely suggest how Wizard of Id ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Wizard of Id himself. The time has come to choose between freedom or slavery, revolt or submission, and liberty or Wizard of Id's particularly cocky form of paternalism. It's clear what Wizard of Id wants us to choose, but of all of his exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Wizard of Id can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong.

If you were to try to tell Wizard of Id's thralls that scores of people just like you have finally decided that they've had enough of his equivocations, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that our top priority in the upcoming weeks must be to renew those institutions of civil society—like families, schools, churches, and civic groups—that ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. Look, of course that's going to be tough. Anybody who tells you it's going to be easy or that one can wave a magic wand and make it happen hasn't been paying attention to how Wizard of Id operates. Nevertheless, Wizard of Id's subalterns explain everything through the lens of Wizard of Id's brutish and ideologically loaded inveracities. In fact, I have said that to Wizard of Id on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until he stops trying to spawn delusions of egotism's resplendence.

Wizard of Id is on some sort of thesaurus-fueled rampage. Every sentence he writes is filled with needlessly long words like "interdestructiveness" and "pharmacodynamic". Either Wizard of Id is deliberately trying to confuse us or else he's secretly scheming to let down ladders that the contumelious, contemptible, and raucous scramble to climb. It would be bad enough if his accomplices were merely trying to encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a brutal lifestyle. But their attempts to prevent me from sleeping soundly at night are just plain homophobic.

What I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a disagreeable wacko. It's a fact. Take this example: Let's say that what really gets my goat is knowing that I am troubled by Wizard of Id's constant exaggerations and half-truths. Now let's say that the big parlor game among his legates is guessing which of them was the first to trivialize the issue. Does that mean that the rules don't apply to Wizard of Id? No, because we must break the neck of his policy of heathenism once and for all if we are ever to address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Wizard of Id because they saw no other options for change. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must really pursue because if Wizard of Id wanted to, he could exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. He could advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills. And he could use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of wrongheaded mental defectives. We must undeniably not allow Wizard of Id to do any of these.

Wizard of Id's belief is that he should be free to impugn the patriotism of his opponents. Hey, Wizard of Id! Satan just called; he wants his worldview back. I hope that his vituperations were intended as a joke, although they're not very funny if they were. Many people lie. However, Wizard of Id lies with such ease it's troubling. Okay, this letter has become much too long so I'll just jump right to the punchline: Even without making an ethical argument against isolationism, I can show that there is considerable evidence to show that Wizard of Id is serious about wanting to cement the foundation of our currently metastasizing police state into the law of the land.

One man, one lawnmower, plenty of angry groundhogs.
BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 22nd May 2010 04:00
Quote: "Hey, Wizard of Id! Satan just called; he wants his worldview back."

:ROFL:

BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 22nd May 2010 04:07
From a programming perspective, I wonder if it just has a giant database of paragraphs to throw together? Because if it doesn't, that's really impressive. The paragraphs are actually really cohesive within themselves.

DJ Almix
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Location: Freedom
Posted: 22nd May 2010 04:43
wizard of id & Peter H you should both write books

It seems though like yes a database of predefined compliments.

wizard of id
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Jan 2006
Location: Sunny South Africa
Posted: 22nd May 2010 09:15
So do we really want to go there....*wink*
Quote: "I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Princess Peter H's nostrums. Before I say anything else, let me remind Princess Peter H that her confreres claim to have no choice but to threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, villainous, rebarbative buttinskies. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. Maybe it's just me, but don't you think that she could use some etiquette lessons? I admit that I'm not perfect. I admit that I may have been a bit chthonic when I stated that it is incumbent upon all of us to confront Princess Peter H's opinions head-on. Still, that doesn't justify the name-calling, rudeness, and simple ugliness that Princess Peter H invariably finds so necessary. Nor does it justify her changing the course of history.

This raises another important point: Princess Peter H's smears are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought. The only way to destroy her Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that one of Princess Peter H's most loyal sympathizers is known to have remarked, "Princess Peter H is a moral exemplar." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that people tell me that the law of self preservation dictates that I illustrate the virtues that Princess Peter H lacks—courage, truthfulness, courtesy, honesty, diligence, chivalry, loyalty, and industry. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course.

Viewing all this from a higher vantage point, we can see that it's unreasonable for Princess Peter H to poke and pry into every facet of our lives. Or perhaps I should say, it's daffy. By and large, her behavior might be different if she were told that she must sincerely believe that if she doesn't spit in the face of propriety, she'll have led a meaningless life. Of course, as far as Princess Peter H is concerned, this fact will fall into the category of, "My mind is made up; don't confuse me with the facts." That's why I'm telling you that the first lies that she told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; Princess Peter H's lies will grow until they blot out the sun.

For the moment, Princess Peter H makes no secret of the fact that her retinue controls illegal drugs and prostitution as well as banking, oil, defense, and the media. And let me tell you, her attempts to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks are much worse than mere wowserism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. She has never tried to stop obtuse finks who replace law and order with anarchy and despotism. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Princess Peter H encourages that sort of behavior. If I understand her snow jobs correctly, then her lieutenants have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize her self-deceiving, stolid goals. It is unquestionably not a pretty sight.

Princess Peter H's actions always follow the same pattern. She puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that the cure for evil is more evil. More often than not, there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Princess Peter H and her spokesmen started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that Princess Peter H keeps stating over and over again that I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that she is beyond reproach. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will unmistakably find that I shall make every effort, especially in this limited space, to rouse people's indignation at Princess Peter H, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that Princess Peter H has been willing to sup with the devil every time she felt she could profit personally from it. Please re-read and memorize that sentence if you still believe that Princess Peter H can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom.

Life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Princess Peter H so compelled to complain about situations over which she has no control? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: Princess Peter H's allies are delighted with the potential for violent confrontation. To enter adequately into details or particulars upon this subject in such a short letter as this is quite out of the question. Hence, I will only remark here, in a general way but with all the emphasis of earnestness and truth, that Princess Peter H says that the bogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to her demands. Although Princess Peter H indeed cut that statement out of whole cloth, she doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. She uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. I believe, way deep down, that Princess Peter H would have us believe that tribalism and alarmism are identical concepts. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Princess Peter H is surrounded by hideous, diabolic profiteers who parrot the same nonsense, which is why if the country were overrun by the most raving galoots you'll ever see, we could expect to observe widespread discrimination in our daily lives—stares from sales clerks, taxis that don't stop, and unwarranted license and registration checks by police.

Princess Peter H argues that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate. To maintain this thesis, Princess Peter H naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which she does by the desperate expedient of claiming that every word that leaves her mouth is teeming with useful information. A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of virulent exponents of obstructionism and others in Princess Peter H's amen corner are about to destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths. I have no reason to doubt that story because the biggest supporters of Princess Peter H's anal-retentive, indelicate conclusions are blinkered Philistines and patronizing drug addicts. A secondary class of ardent supporters consists of ladies of elastic virtue and cosmopolitan tendencies to whom such things afford a decent excuse for displaying their fascinations at their open windows. Princess Peter H's viewpoints are an abomination. I've already explained why, but let me add that if anything, if I seem a bit muddleheaded, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with Princess Peter H on her own level.

One of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which Princess Peter H is willing to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering, especially given that she herself would be affected by such actions. She has been trying to raise funds for scientific studies that "prove" that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. This is what's called "advocacy research" or "junk science" because it's funded by morally crippled pantywaists who have already decided that the media should "create" news rather than report it. To some extent, to say that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape is coldhearted nonsense and untrue to boot. For heaven's sake, Princess Peter H's litanies will have consequences—very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to deliver Princess Peter H from her appalling ignorance. We ought to spread the word that we must give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.

Let me clue you in on a little something: All of Princess Peter H's diatribes are burdened by a specious magniloquence. Well, that's another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that I want to see all of us working together to reveal some shocking facts about Princess Peter H's ideologies. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that I must ask that Princess Peter H's disciples push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination. This is not the place to develop that subject. It demands many pages of analysis, which I can't spare in this letter. Instead, I'll just state the key point, which is that Princess Peter H is utterly soulless. We all are, to some extent, but she sets the curve.

So remember kids, if you want to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous, all you have to do is agree to let Princess Peter H declare martial law, suspend elections, and round up dissidents (i.e., anyone who does not buy her lie that she acts in the name of equality and social justice). She has no innate compass for judging what is proper behavior and what is unacceptable. Ask anyone. Before I move on, I just want to state once more that her propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Princess Peter H's threats are our final line of defense against tyrrany" and, "Our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups". What they don't tell you, though, is that Princess Peter H's disdainful, polyloquent manifestos have caused lawless chiselers to descend upon us like a swarm of locusts, retarding the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population. Now that this letter is over, I pray that my logic and passion have convinced you that Princess Peter H prefers to see problems talked to death instead of solved."


"In my weird politically incorrect hypothetically incoherent contradicting obscured world definitively maybe"

Diggsey
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Apr 2006
Location: On this web page.
Posted: 22nd May 2010 13:41
Quote: "My complaint about Capt. Lee Bamber I

Through this letter, I intend to serve as a facilitator who will help you draw your own conclusions about Capt. Lee Bamber I. That is, I'll be your "guide on the side", not a "sage on the stage". With my assistance, you'll soon gain a deep understanding of how I don't know how to deal with the worst types of impudent humanity-haters I've ever seen. The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter but the conclusion's general outline is that Lee's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that he wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to challenge Lee's phlegmatic assumptions about merit.

Nevertheless, given a choice of having Lee empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. With his musings hanging over us like the Sword of Damocles, it makes sense that he would swear on a stack of Bibles that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that if Lee truly wanted to be helpful, he wouldn't break down traditional values. To those few who disagree with some of the things I've written, I ask for your tolerance. I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Lee-induced disaster because doing so clearly demonstrates how he has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, Lee's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, his vows of equality did little more than convince people that heathenism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge.

I hate to say this, but I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because Lee contends that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold and that, therefore, everything is happy and fine and good. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces unholy gauleiters (as distinct from the vile, semi-intelligible know-nothings who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that Lee values our perspectives. In reality, contrariwise, Lee wants to prohibit any discussion of her attempts to rob, steal, cheat, and murder. While it is clear why he wants that to be a taboo subject, I overheard one of Lee's emissaries say, "Lee is God's representative on Earth." This quotation demonstrates the power of language as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of uneducated Neanderthals. Why am I furious? Because we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with him. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that when he was first found trying to turn over our country to jaded agitators, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Lee is planning to deprive people of dignity and autonomy, I'm indubitably terrified. And why am I embarrassed? Because materialism is a plague upon us all, a pox that will likely not be erased in the lifetime of any reader of this letter. To Lee, however, it's merely a convenient mechanism for ushering in the rule of the Antichrist and the apocalyptic end times. Lastly, Capt. Lee Bamber I's cult followers mistakenly associate "lengthy" with "accurate" when it comes to his convictions."


Aaagreen
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2007
Location: City 17
Posted: 22nd May 2010 16:43
Quote: "I have been meaning to write this letter for some time now and, in light of recent developments, I believe it is appropriate. Some background is in order: I know in my heart of hearts that Dr. Gordon Freeman cites the alleged benefits of Maoism—which are mostly unsupported, irrelevant, or distortions of the scientific literature—to justify robbing us of our lives, our health, our honor, and our belongings. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that he needs to step out of the dark ages? To answer that question, note that history provides a number of instructive examples for us to study. For instance, it has long been the case that in a rather infamous speech, Dr. Freeman exclaimed that misoneism and academicism are identical concepts. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.)

I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Dr. Freeman to etiolate his enemies, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Dr. Freeman claims that you and I are inferior to hypersensitive geeks. Would he like it if I were immoral and ethically bankrupt, too? I don't think so.

This is not the first time we've had trouble with snotty buggers, and it won't be the last. (The merits of Dr. Freeman's publicity stunts won't be discussed here because they lack merit.) Dr. Freeman's behavior might be different if he were told that he has a deficiency of real goals. Of course, as far as Dr. Freeman is concerned, this fact will fall into the category of, "My mind is made up; don't confuse me with the facts." That's why I'm telling you that it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Will his animal cunning, arrogance, greed, and self-aggrandizement grant him a final victory over humanity?" The answer should be self-evident so let me just point out that if Dr. Freeman gets his way, none of us will be able to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them. Therefore, we must not let Dr. Freeman popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge what I call impudent, effrontive lowbrows to twist my words six ways for Sunday.

Plan to join Dr. Freeman's camp? Be sure to check your conscience at the door. Be always mindful that Dr. Freeman is not the only one who needs to reassess his assumptions. Think about destructive roustabouts. They too should realize that if we don't soon tell Dr. Freeman to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his refractory, piteous morals, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Dr. Freeman our permission to do so. On several occasions I have heard him state that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is an unstable loon deserving of death and damnation. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important though is that I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to Dr. Freeman how anyone who takes his inaniloquent objectives seriously has obviously not spent much time around stroppy cult leaders. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep Dr. Freeman will have to dig into his profanity thesaurus to formulate a response.

Let me carry my thoughts on this subject a bit further. Dr. Freeman believes, in his elitist delirium, that he holds a universal license that allows him to use our weaknesses to his advantage. But there's the rub; he is a bear of very little brain, and long words bother him. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if he finds a way to scar little children's self-image. One thing is certain: We must indisputably clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in his equivocations. Does that sound extremist? Is it too truculent for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: Neocolonialism is arguably the most frightening and devastating problem facing us all."


Your signature was immature.
Travis Gatlin
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 22nd May 2010 19:27
I feel insulted...

Google.com. Nuff Said
<img src="http://friend-space.webs.com/photos/Friend%20Space%20Image.bmp">
Herakles
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Mar 2009
Location: Lost in my own head
Posted: 24th May 2010 20:50
I'd like to take a minute of your time to share some of my thoughts about Capt. James T Kirk with you. First things first: Kirk must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why Kirk accuses me of admitting that elected national governments are not accountable to their own people. What I actually said is that we can't stop Kirk overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse.

Regardless of what Kirk seems to maintain, he works from the false assumption that most people actually want choleric charlatans to abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology. Should you think I'm saying too much, please note that the public is like a giant that he has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Kirk leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to stop defending the peevish status quo and, instead, implement a bold, new agenda for change. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that Kirk is incapable of writing a letter without using such phrases as "deranged slubberdegullions", "stingy deadbeats", "flagitious liars and cheats", or some combination thereof. But the problems with Kirk's scribblings don't end there.

Whenever Kirk tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Some immoral, heinous apostates are actually considering helping him suck up to the most snippy maggots I've ever seen. How quickly such people forget that they were lied to, made fun of, and ridiculed by Kirk on numerous occasions. His hijinks are more than just ornery. They're a revolt against nature. Just think: If this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to resolve a number of lingering problems. That's all I have time now to write. If you want to get more insight into Capt. James T Kirk's mentality, though, then study the details of his claims. Try to see the big picture: It will amaze you. It will take your breath away. And it will convince you that the deep-seated, unbridled hatred that Kirk's thralls have for us is visceral and inculcated from cradle to grave.

thenerd
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Mar 2009
Location: Boston, USA
Posted: 24th May 2010 23:49
@Aaagreen, lol, now I know how valve created all those speeches that breen says...

Shadowtroid
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Dec 2009
Location: nope
Posted: 25th May 2010 02:27
I have been following the stories and comments surrounding Comdr. Shepard, and frankly, I'm appalled. Isn't Comdr. Shepard the tasteless fanatic who recently wanted to stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful? Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how I'm not very conversant with Comdr. Shepard's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that Comdr. Shepard can't possibly believe that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. He's tyrannical but he's not that tyrannical.

If Comdr. Shepard were paying attention—which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this—he'd see that he has planted his representatives everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Comdr. Shepard's ability to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that I love hearing the claims of a wild fanatic who doesn't realize that he's a wild fanatic. As a case in point, consider Comdr. Shepard's claim that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. Such claims always make me laugh because, as we all know, it's quite easy for Comdr. Shepard to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is he going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: He keeps insisting that he defends the real needs of the working class. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that there are two classes of people in this world. There are those who clear-cut ancient forest lands, and there are those who improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society—the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth—all of whose lives are made miserable by Shepard. Comdr. Shepard fits neatly into the former category, of course.

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Comdr. Shepard had learned anything from history, he'd know that for the time being, this is not a major issue. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. He says that he can bring about peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity through violence, deception, oppression, exploitation, graft, and theft. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd definitely prevent anyone from hearing that he says that everyone would be a lot safer if he were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions—even our library records. Why on Earth does he need to monitor our library records? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems but it boils down essentially to this: Comdr. Shepard always turns to the dark bible of propagandism whenever he needs ideas on how to marginalize me based on my gender, race, or religion. Furthermore, he recently went through a parasitism phase in which he tried repeatedly to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to his announcements. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that in public, Comdr. Shepard vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Comdr. Shepard never fails to galvanize a raucous hysteria, a large-scale version of the slimy mentality that can dupe people into believing that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty.

To put it crudely, what really sticks in my craw is seeing Comdr. Shepard turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to work together towards a shared vision. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that in order to convince us that he has achieved sainthood, Comdr. Shepard often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Although I respect his right to free speech just as I respect it for self-deceiving rotters, pea-brained mattoids, and egocentric loudmouths, Comdr. Shepard argues that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. To maintain this thesis, Comdr. Shepard naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which he does by the desperate expedient of claiming that snarky troublemakers and grotty, testy schmoes should rule this country.

It's somewhat tricky to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem, especially since the media in this country tend to ignore historical connections and are reluctant to analyze ideological positions or treat a fringe political group seriously. When Comdr. Shepard says that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says intemperate things, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound. He likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of narcissism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, Comdr. Shepard invariably instructs his shills to bring this battle to a fever pitch. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual it makes perfect sense in light of Comdr. Shepard's repressive fusillades. I hardly need to tell you that almost every day, he outreaches himself in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's honestly breathtaking to watch him. Okay, have you had enough of this letter? Good. Let's end it by reiterating that I challenge Comdr. Shepard to admit he was wrong and thereby begin the healing process.

I've been playing a lot of Mass Effect 2 recently.

Travis Gatlin
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 9th Jun 2010 17:16
I added the words your face to the company box and here is what i come up with


Your Face's lack of professional ethics has become so flagrant that it merits your complete attention. Consider this letter not as a monologue but rather as a joint effort between writer and reader. Together we shall lay the groundwork for an upcoming attempt to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose. Together we shall lead us all toward a better, brighter future. And together we shall move our nation forward into stratospheres of greatness. I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because even when Your Face isn't lying, it's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable it to take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift. Why am I furious? Because if I want to walk around with a mountain of pain and suffering welled up inside me, that should be my prerogative. I don't need Your Face forcing me to. And why am I embarrassed? Because I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that Your Face is like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of credentialism and you'll see a longiloquent loudmouth hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of frotteurism in an ungrateful attempt to take us over the edge of the abyss of quislingism. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that Your Face has spent untold hours trying to acquire public acceptance of its despicable principles. During that time, did it ever once occur to it that its writings are a treasure trove of ad hominem attacks, possession-obsessed accusations, and biased reporting from a truculent point of view? To turn that question around, has it ever considered what would happen if a small fraction of its time spent trying to pursue a twofold credo of boosterism and statism was instead spent on something productive? To answer that question, note that history provides a number of instructive examples for us to study. For instance, it has long been the case that there isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that the worst sorts of inarticulate nonentities there are are easily housebroken, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of Your Face's from the get-go. With this letter, I hope I have made my views crystal-clear: Your Face's ruses are wrong for the same reason that drug use, adultery, lust, murder, and lying are wrong.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his
bond1
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location:
Posted: 9th Jun 2010 21:57
Ahaha! Awesome!

At first I missed the link at the top, and read the whole post thinking, "Oh man, this dude has LOST it."

----------------------------------------
"bond1 - You see this name, you think dirty."
Fallout
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Sep 2002
Location: Basingstoke, England
Posted: 9th Jun 2010 23:09 Edited at: 9th Jun 2010 23:11
@bond1 - Do you ever check your hyrumark.com email address?

Insert piccy sig here. Eh? Why didn't that work?!?! Must ring help-a-noob. What was the number again? .... where am I?

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-24 10:32:35
Your offset time is: 2025-05-24 10:32:35