Quote: "It's funny how the people whose threads are locked are the ones most against the mods."
Eh? Who's that referring to?
Quote: "Also that particular thread had run its course there was nothing productive going to come out of it."
But that's the thing - I think the mods are too oversensitive to 'run its course'. I get the picture - that wasn't a lock due to disagreement, OK. But the "this has run its course" just seems far too quick.
The same thread had quite a bit of agreement that actual users were being oversensitive. I agree with this - but I also think the mods are being oversensitive. OK, maybe not oversensitive - but a bit too... I don't know how to put it. Quick to lock things. Not in a bad way, but in a overprotective way. We get that you're guarding against flames and being proactive but sometimes it seems a bit
too much.
That thread turned kind of sour with critique of the mods - but at the same time, none of it was outrageously 'flamey'. It's a provocative topic but it was not spurring on outbursts or anything. And I think sometimes that kind of 'vent' is needed - otherwise it becomes circular. The fact this thread exists, in fact, is a demonstration of this.
The slaps and bans I couldn't care less about - but maybe the process of locking just needs to slow down a little. Instant is good when a thread is a run away train of abuse, but other things just need to run their course without artificial limiting
Quote: "You have NO idea what you're talking about. Many of the locks are discussed beforehand in the mod lounge, and quite often we ask other mods for second opinions and/or locking advice. We're not just coldly locking every thread we disagree with. Obviously"
Being fair, since we can't actually see this, there is no possible way I could have known what I was talking about.
But that's also the thing - if you can't see something, the motives are hidden. I'm not saying the motives are ever bad - but not seeing that discussion behind the scenes leaves people with the wrong impression. The robotic quote of the AUP rarely serves as an explanation either
09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0