@DavidR
I respect your non-paranormal opinion. I will not go into a heated argument about religions and beliefs, since that is against the AUP, but I know myself that I did not set this up, and I really do believe in ghosts and paranormal activity now.
Quote: "If a "ghost" actually appeared in a photograph, then it would mean that the ghost is physical in nature, meaning that it isn't a ghost by any stretch of the conventional definition. So even if it is something "paranormal" (and I don't think it is), I think you can rule out "ghost", simply by the fact that it was captured with a camera."
Your argument in honor, but there are too many "other cases" on the internet that DO capture non-physical objects, ghosts being one of them. It has been proven that cameras are capable of picking things up the eye can not see.
Quote: "1. the reflectivity is off, the lighting on the face should be greater from the angle of the shadows.
Theres a artifact from the person on the actual guitar aswell on the trim."
Show me one ghost picture where the reflectivity is on
And for the rest of your points, I refer you to bergice's first post.
@ Neuro Fuzzy
I would agree any other time, but this really happened to me...
Quote: "A ghost that you just happened to catch while randomly looking at reflections from your guitar with your camera?"
Well, that would be the first post in one sentence
Quote: "It couldn't have been a ghost, since they don't exist. "
lol
Quote: "Did you know you can just photoshop things these days???"
Yeah, but I am not at all talented in photoshop... I don't even have the program. I am only good at programming games, look at my post history
Quote: "Whoa! Nice guitar. Why are you posting a picture of your guitar?"
Because I have a sandwich in my ear.
TheComet