Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Neerdy ways of saying "I love you."

Author
Message
Cuddle Bunniezzz 12
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jan 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 04:20 Edited at: 24th Sep 2010 04:23
Okay guys, what are some of the most neerdy ways you can say "I love you," to someone?

One from a T-Shirt:
Roses are #FF0000
Violets are #0000FF
All my base
are belong to you

One I made up:
Like C without that "++", without you, I have no class.

http://ref.darkgdk.us/ <- Online DarkGDK Refernece. More content coming soon.
CocaCola
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2010
Location: CocaCola.x CocaCola.y CocaCola.z
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 04:36
I could use some of those, except nobody would understand. Anyway my fav from websites (not really ilu's):
Our love is like dividing by zero…. you cannot define it
Let’s get together and test the spring potential of my mattress
I less than three you
You had me at “Hello World.”

I want coke, not Pepsi!
Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 04:42
I like the T-Shirt one

i = + You
(i also being infinity )

Me += You

Me && You = 1

Happy Cheesecake
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Jun 2009
Location: My non-vice-presidential refrigerator.
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 04:42
Oh yeah, this thread has some epic potential. Keep going.

Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 05:36
Was in a discussion where I came up with 'Logical Positivist Romance'.

Sadly...I can't remember it. :/ I was mostly twisting Wittgenstein quotes. It was very logical, not very romantic sounding. As it was on GTalk, I might be able Google my inbox and find it.


You could go for a Kantian pick up line:

"All cognition begins with experience, so lets make you a posteriori."

Probably a bit rude.

Click!
AutoBot
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Sep 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 05:38 Edited at: 24th Sep 2010 05:41
Quote: "Let’s get together and test the spring potential of my mattress"

This thread's gonna get inappropriate...

Nice avatar by the way, CB12.

Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 06:03
Under no circumstances should anyone integrate this function into their daily programmed lives...


This one, though...



That one kind of works.

Click here to go to my blog!
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 06:08 Edited at: 24th Sep 2010 06:08
Quote: "Under no circumstances should anyone integrate this function into their daily programmed lives..."


Especially since the first statement will execute due to the wrong operator being used.
DJ Almix
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Location: Freedom
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 06:12
If X = your lower half, then what happens when you divide X and insert one.

I couldn't really think of anything on the spot

Your signature has been erased by a mod because it's almost 1MB in size
Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 06:16
@Benjamin:

Ha! Maybe I shouldn't use a boolean and instead use an integer variable? That way I could set it to be a 1 in 100 chance of babies on the way...and it'd be easier to make sure that statement doesn't get executed every time.

Click here to go to my blog!
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 06:19 Edited at: 24th Sep 2010 06:20
What I meant was your babies = true will assign babies as 'true' and will result in a true condition. I think you meant babies == true.
marlou
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jan 2009
Location:
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 07:13
I feel that the attraction between us is greater than the repulsion. But unlike everything else that is attracted together because of gravitational force. I feel like our masses and the weight of our being drives us together than the clashing of us being opposites pushing us apart.

Im talking about gravitational force and magnetic repulsion.

Or maybe something like,

Like the atoms that compose the wonderful universe and the bond between atoms that make molecules altogether, I feel that we too are destined to bond and make sense in this world. It will be unlikely that our togetherness will just evaporate away as I feel that there is too much attraction between us.

Im talking about atomic bonds.

I just made it up out of nowhere. And then maybe you say, "Like the greatest force that bonds quarks together, i feel this force that drives me towards you more compelling than anything.".

When a person has nothing but a dream, can he dare to dream.
Fatal Berserker
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Jul 2010
Location:
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 11:46
nice pickup lines

Smoke me a kipper, ill be back for breakfast.
marlou
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jan 2009
Location:
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 15:02
Quote: "nice pickup lines "


The thread is about nerdy ways. What did you expect?

Hmm..I have something nerdy..=)

It seems that like the codes that I wrote that flow in symphony to the rhythm of appropriate syntax which gives life to a new beautiful sight, every moment I spend with you seems to go in tune with the music of life. (Im talking about coding)

Or..maybe..maybe..

Every moment I spend with you seems to boil up to a summation of variables that when we let our summation factor approach to inifinity defines a function of love and life. (Im talking about infinite summations that define equations like McLauren or Taylor)

Well, as far as I know, You need to make your words suggest something emotional specially when your talking about intelligent stuff that your prospect lady wont understand. But really, I havent tried talking that way to a lady. I can't dare to.

When a person has nothing but a dream, can he dare to dream.
The Slayer
Forum Vice President
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Nov 2009
Playing: (Hide and) Seek and Destroy on my guitar!
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 15:11
How about these...?







Slayer rules!!! Yeaaah, man!
marlou
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jan 2009
Location:
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 15:22




When a person has nothing but a dream, can he dare to dream.
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 15:22
''Get in the van.''

Works for me.

Health, Ammo, and bacon and eggs!
budokaiman
FPSC Tool Maker
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Jun 2009
Playing: Hard to get
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 15:30
Quote: "''Get in the van.''"

Shouldn't it be the other way around, or are you trying to tell us something?

Putting the fear back into sliced bread since 4th May 2010
Melancholic
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Nov 2009
Location:
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 16:24


Only look if you prepared for the worst pickup line in existence.





Not as geeky, but still geeky...


I can count to banana...
lazerus
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2008
Location:
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 16:36
Im a classic kind of guy, White roses to aviod cliche' A bottle of wine and chocloates. Ill stop there but yeah im a hopeless romantic

Darth Kiwi
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Jan 2005
Location: On the brink of insanity.
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 17:50
I saw one in somebody's sig once. I think it went like this:



assuming that sugar and you are predefined constants, of course.

Secretary of Unknowable Knowledge for the Rock/Dink administration '08
Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 21:30
Quote: "What I meant was your babies = true will assign babies as 'true' and will result in a true condition. I think you meant babies == true."


Ah, I see. I'm still not entirely used to the syntax of C++/C# and forgot that I would need to add the extra "=" operator. I'd go back and fix it, but it's not worth it.


Quote: "'Get in the van.'"
"Shouldn't it be the other way around, or are you trying to tell us something?"


ROTFLOL!!! Sorry Van B, but he got you there.

Click here to go to my blog!
Cuddle Bunniezzz 12
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jan 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 22:21 Edited at: 24th Sep 2010 22:24
@coffeCoder

I couldn't help but overlook that you forgot to add in parameters for your functions. Unless they are globals

And for your babies function, shouldn't you change the "babies," in your if statements to "havingBaby," just to avoid compiler confusion?

A dirty C++ one:


http://ref.darkgdk.us/ <- Online DarkGDK Refernece. More content coming soon.
Virtual Nomad
Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 22:41 Edited at: 24th Sep 2010 22:42
Quote: "Neerdy ways..."

based on the title, i expected "i love you"'s from ne'er-do-wells

Virtual Nomad @ California, USA . DBPro V7.5
AMD Phenom™ X4 9750 Quad-Core @ 2.4 GHz . 8 GB PC2-6400 RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3650 @ 512 MB . Vista Home Premium 64 Bit
Metal Devil123
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Jul 2008
Location: Suomi, Finland
Posted: 24th Sep 2010 22:44
Quote: "''Get in the van.''"

lol, the best one so far

This is great stuff, keep it coming- what?... not everyone will undertand these... the thread is just for laughs... I look like total moron for trying these... DAMN!

Neuro Fuzzy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Jun 2007
Location:
Posted: 25th Sep 2010 00:52
Quote: "Our love is like dividing by zero…. you cannot define it"

YOU DID WHAT???


This seems fitting:

"I like c++ because friends access to each other's private members"


Quote: "What’s your sine? It must be pi/2 because you’re the 1."

I LOVE THIS ONE

Game Master1330
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2007
Location: (GetReaderXYZ() * 42 ) / 0
Posted: 25th Sep 2010 02:31
You turn my software into hardware

Do u like my hard drive?
It's got a lot of ram and it's not floppy

Umm...
Sid Sinister
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jul 2005
Location:
Posted: 25th Sep 2010 23:20
Quote: "Get in the van"


I lol'd so hard

"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants" - Isaac Newton
Current Project: http://strewnfield.wordpress.com/ (Last updated 06/11/09)
Fatal Berserker
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Jul 2010
Location:
Posted: 26th Sep 2010 00:02
Your place or my mums?

Smoke me a kipper, ill be back for breakfast.
Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 26th Sep 2010 01:56
Quote: "I couldn't help but overlook that you forgot to add in parameters for your functions. Unless they are globals

And for your babies function, shouldn't you change the "babies," in your if statements to "havingBaby," just to avoid compiler confusion?"


I'm still pretty unfamiliar with parameters in functions in C++/C#...so, yes, the variables are global.

And I dunno how just "babies" could cause compiler confusion...unless there's an actual "babies" function in C++ already...

Cuddle Bunniezzz 12
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jan 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posted: 27th Sep 2010 05:46
Quote: "And I dunno how just "babies" could cause compiler confusion...unless there's an actual "babies" function in C++ already..."


Well, you see, in the global scope, the variable "babies" already exists (as a boolean value), so you can't have a function with the same name (you also forgot to define the return value of the function, but seeing as there is no return statement in there, you might want it to just want to set it as a "void" function).

http://ref.darkgdk.us/ <- Online DarkGDK Refernece. More content coming soon.
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 29th Sep 2010 02:17
Oh my goodness we're a bunch of geeks, arguing about syntax in programmer jokes.


Senior Web Developer - Nokia
thenerd
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Mar 2009
Location: Boston, USA
Posted: 29th Sep 2010 03:25
Quote: "Get in the van."

Totally unrelated, but also the name of a surf documentary that some of my friends made. Just had to say that.

Quote: "Well, you see, in the global scope, the variable "babies" already exists (as a boolean value), so you can't have a function with the same name (you also forgot to define the return value of the function, but seeing as there is no return statement in there, you might want it to just want to set it as a "void" function)."

Python has a function called Babies(), not sure what it does though.

Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 29th Sep 2010 03:51
Quote: "Oh my goodness we're a bunch of geeks, arguing about syntax in programmer jokes. "


I know, right? xD


Quote: "Python has a function called Babies(), not sure what it does though."


Maybe it spawns a lot of pythons...? I dunno.

David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 15:25 Edited at: 30th Sep 2010 15:26
Quote: "Ah, I see. I'm still not entirely used to the syntax of C++/C# and forgot that I would need to add the extra "=" operator. I'd go back and fix it, but it's not worth it"


More important mistake you've made: A semicolon after an if() makes it a statement with no effect (and means it isn't attached to the scope below it)

So in your example, the code underneath each if() will run irrespective of the conditions

09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
Fatal Berserker
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Jul 2010
Location:
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 19:00
and you cant call a variable the same thing as a function

Smoke me a kipper, ill be back for breakfast.
Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 20:25 Edited at: 30th Sep 2010 20:27
Quote: "So in your example, the code underneath each if() will run irrespective of the conditions"


Oops.

Fine. I'll fix it.



Does that work?

Quote: "and you cant call a variable the same thing as a function"


?
Who said anything about that? I just said that the variables inside my other function were global...

EDIT: fixed a couple things

Diggsey
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Apr 2006
Location: On this web page.
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 20:53 Edited at: 30th Sep 2010 20:54
You can't have 'int void'



[b]
Shadow Blade
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 31st Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 22:46
You guys make me feel cool .
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 23:07 Edited at: 30th Sep 2010 23:12
Ok, I was bored and fixed up CoffeeCoder's code.




Senior Web Developer - Nokia
Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 23:10
Do y'all see why I probably shouldn't program for a career?

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 23:38
Nah, you'd see what your errors are on first compile. Everyone starts small


Senior Web Developer - Nokia
Aaagreen
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2007
Location: City 17
Posted: 30th Sep 2010 23:52
Is that a "mint limited edition luke skywalker in stormtrooper costume" figurine in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?


I'd love to see things from your point of view but I can't get my head that far up my bum.
dab
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Sep 2004
Location: Your Temp Folder!
Posted: 1st Oct 2010 01:30
Quote: "Is that a "mint limited edition luke skywalker in stormtrooper costume" figurine in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?"


That's er... how you say "I love you" to someone? O.o


CocaCola
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2010
Location: CocaCola.x CocaCola.y CocaCola.z
Posted: 1st Oct 2010 01:46
Quote: "if(babies > 0) { "

if babies > 0? so atleast 1? If there just getting married and had no other babies in the code there should be none.

I want coke, not Pepsi!
Juzi
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Mar 2007
Location: Finland
Posted: 1st Oct 2010 02:08
"I'll need update my GPU to see you in full shine"

Deflate the mystery of living in the most heartless fashion I could ever imagine. No pretense of decor.
PW Productions
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Mar 2009
Location: sitting in a chair.
Posted: 1st Oct 2010 02:09
"I luv all your pixels!!"


Redoing my entire website... again. EDIT: Finished it! Whew.
dab
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Sep 2004
Location: Your Temp Folder!
Posted: 1st Oct 2010 04:48
"Your bandwidth completes me."

The Slayer
Forum Vice President
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Nov 2009
Playing: (Hide and) Seek and Destroy on my guitar!
Posted: 1st Oct 2010 16:57
This is one I just found out:





Slayer rules!!! Yeaaah, man!
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 18th Oct 2010 11:49 Edited at: 18th Oct 2010 11:49
sad to see this thread dying D: i really really enjoyed reading these^^

edit: i hope this will count as an uninnocent bump =3


[Q]uik, Quiker than most

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-23 02:38:17
Your offset time is: 2025-05-23 02:38:17