Pay day in a little over a week
But I'm stuck between two choices.
There's the Lenovo G560 and the Lenovo G565.
The Lenovo G560 is £398 on DABs (or £592 on Amazon)
The Lenovo G565 is £359 on Amazon
(Lenovo's website only sells a G560 for £599, but higher spec and no other G Series models available)
The differences are:
Processor
G560 - Intel Core i3 370m
G565 - AMD Athlon II X2 Dual-Core P320 2.1GHz
From looking on PassMark, the Intel i3 performs a lot better. The i3 (350m, the one that comes with the laptop is a 370m) scores 2,055, whilst the AMD scores 1,269.
But:
Graphics:
G560 - Intel GMA HD (3D Mark - 2811)
G565 - ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 (3D Mark 3236.8)
Other specs are pretty much identical (2GB RAM DDR3, upgradable to 8, 250gb HDD, Windows 7 64bit, Lenovo Enhanced Experience for Win7...).
Is it worth going for an Intel GMA HD card? Are they really that bad? From reading a review on the card, it sounds as though it performs like a GeForce 9400M or an ATI Radeon HD 4200.
Or is the i3 really
that much better than an AMD Athlon? Whilst yes, its primary usage isn't going to be gaming (so in theory I should go for the better processor), but I might install the odd game on there and I'd want a smooth frame rate more than anything (as opposed to really flashy graphics), so I'd want the graphics card and processor to deliver.
[edit]
Then if I'm willing to spend more (and I probably am), there's the Thinkpad Edge models to compare.
ThinkPad Edge 15 AMD, comes with AMD Turion II DC P540 (1,501, so a higher score than the Athlon) and ATI Radeon HD 4250 (£459)
ThinkPad Edge 15 Intel, comes with Intel i3 and Intel GMA HD (£480)
Still 2gb RAM, but 500gb HDD and Windows 7 Professional 64bit (XP Mode FTW!)
The same questions apply, but I think with the Thinkpad Edge, I'd be getting more HDD space and a better version of Windows, as well as more reliability. Sure they're over budget, but still a bloody bargain in my book.