Quote: "Consumers will wise up soon and go back to using standard devices. As for those interested with working with Apple Inc. I dont recomend it. If you have money invested in Apple, I recomend in 6 months you pull out. Microsoft will soon start to persue the smart phone and tablet market. Microsoft never does anything lightly and they will dominate the market. "
Just like they did with the Zune? Apple won the MP3 player market and still after many years lots and lots of people are buying iPods. With the smartphone market, Apple are still standing strong, even though Microsoft have had their foot in it. Microsoft even had Windows on portable devices before any of the iPhone or iPad malarky, yet they didn't meet the same success as Apple's marketing risk with the tablet PC. Not trying to say Apple is better than Microsoft, after all Microsoft STILL hold a VERY strong market with their operating systems, heck this is being typed from within Windows 7 and not MacOS X. I love MacOS X, but I'm still a Windows person. I don't think Microsoft will take the tablet market and probably realise that they won't.
But it seems from within the Microsoft user base there's a LOT of bias against Apple. It seems everytime Apple takes a risk with a new product and change the market they're faced with heavy criticism...when that market and product is successful other companies latch on and release their own versions, like the Samsung Galaxy range of products people STILL criticise what Apple have done yet find themselves in favour of the duplicates out there and in defense argue, "Apple haven't done anything new, look 'x' company did something similar 'y' years ago" because they don't want to admit anything in favour of Apple. Yes, 'x' company may have done something similar 'y' years ago, but they're not the ones who opened the current market and they're not the ones who people are trying to duplicate.
No innovation in the electronics is completely original anyway (why reinvent the wheel?), there's a great deal of borrowing and new ideas being added and new approaches used or simply people thinking, "that's a good idea, but not enough people have used it", Apple make their own contributions even if people refuse to admit it. The current tablet market has had a big input from Apple and they're very strong and I don't think they claimed to have 'invented' the tablet either. I mean, it is a big iPod Touch essentially, just re-purposed with a larger viewing area to do more.
Quote: "Think about it in common logic. 95% of you reading this are using a PC. For the 5% on a Mac in 3 years you will be reading it from a 2,000 paper weight. PC users can at least upgrade their machine. Apple don't sell parts, so good luck with that upgrade. Point being, Microsoft controls the market still. Because Apple contenue's to make poor engineering choices, they will allways suffer. Im not going to buy your machine if I cant upgrade it or modify it physicaly. So why would I buy your other hardware devices? Why would I not buy a Microsoft product. I use their OS and I know I can trust Microsoft. So why would I buy other peoples device for more money? I would not and thats the point. "
1) My Mum, who does illustration runs an old eMac she's had for long time.
2) She upgraded the RAM so she could run a newer version of Photoshop.
3) It works fine, she can do her artwork/illustrations with no problems. She doesn't need an Intel i7 Mac with an ATI Radeon HD Graphics card with 8gb RAM. Technology is only a paper weight when it's no long useful to the USER, not when it's considered 'old' and 'decrepid' by the current technology.
4) Apple sell parts. Not just RAM either and Apple aren't only sellers. E.G.
ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac,
ATI Radeon HD 5770 PC
Not every type of Mac can be upgraded, nor can every type of PC.
And when I was working in retail, the majority of people looking for computers didn't care that they could upgrade their system, heck if I were to talk about simple technical details I would have scared them off. What the average computer user is interested in is if it'll do what they want it to do. If it can do that and they're willing to pay the price offered, they will buy it. Most of the time people wanted to know if it'll run Facebook, run Facebook games, do email, connect to the internet (second hand computers with faulty wireless or no wireless were impossible to sell, even though they could upgrade easily) and run office applications.
And a geek like me isn't bothered that the only component in my ThinkPad I can upgrade is the RAM, because it does everything I need it to. 3 years down the line, it'll still do what it's doing now and it's less powerful than the laptop (now dead) I bought 3 years ago. As for Desktop PC, a Mac Mini would actually do what I need. I'm not a massive PC gamer. I play my games on an XBox 360.
[Edit]
I hope I don't come off as hostile. I know when a 'Mac' is brought up on these forums get heated, but I'm actually chilled...as always.