Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / What Is The Best/More Standard Way Of Outputting To a TV?

Author
Message
Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 01:55
As the beginning of the Basic Binary Box's development nears (it will begin by October 1st) i realized something--since the beginning, i have always thought of using a standard RCA jack to send sound and video to the TV. Then i realized that there must be a better or more standardized way to connect these days. What are those? If there is a digital method, i would very much like to look into that as i would prefer not to deal with analog if i didnt have to, although i definitely could do that! Opinions?

There is one game i play, it has perfect looking raycasting and is rendered at a very high FPS real time. This game i find very fun. What is this game? This game is life on earth.
Eminent
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Jul 2010
Location:
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 04:08
HDMI cables?


Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 05:04
I will look into that! Haha i guess that should have been obvious to me!

There is one game i play, it has perfect looking raycasting and is rendered at a very high FPS real time. This game i find very fun. What is this game? This game is life on earth.
CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 10:04
Yeh, HDMIs will slowly replace everything from ethernets to optical leads, so best to go with them.

bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 11:46
I think you may have to license HDMI. Might I recommend DVI in that case.


bruce3371
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Aug 2010
Location: Englishland
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 19:23 Edited at: 14th Sep 2011 19:24
Quote: "I think you may have to license HDMI."


Try this website, it gives information about becoming an HDMI Adopter;

http://www.hdmi.org/

CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 20:32
Also, HDMI'd probably be irritatingly complex to code for.

IanM
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Sep 2002
Location: In my moon base
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 20:34
HDMI - $10,000 yearly membership fee, $0.04 per device.

Pretty much all of the high-def stuff is tied up that way.

For DVI, I'm not sure - I know there's a group you can join, but I don't know if you HAVE to join. You do have to sign an adopters agreement, but the spec is itself royalty free (no per-device payment required).

Oh for the simple days of standard RF output...

CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 14th Sep 2011 21:22
99% of TVs are still scart/component compatible anyway, so it might be worth your while just using those.

Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 15th Sep 2011 00:54
Holy crudle dumps! 10 grand a year?? I think ill pass...

Lol but yah what CoffeeGrunt said is right, and if there does happen to be a TV without that support, it shouldnt be a problem to find an adapter!

There is one game i play, it has perfect looking raycasting and is rendered at a very high FPS real time. This game i find very fun. What is this game? This game is life on earth.
CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 15th Sep 2011 00:56
Even these wafer thin LED TVs come with scart adapters, but no sockets, so you've still got the compatibility.

I imagine HD resolution isn't a concern with it anyway, right?

Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 15th Sep 2011 01:08
Haha no, resolution isnt a concern!

There is one game i play, it has perfect looking raycasting and is rendered at a very high FPS real time. This game i find very fun. What is this game? This game is life on earth.
IanM
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Sep 2002
Location: In my moon base
Posted: 15th Sep 2011 01:16
Actually RF is a serious suggestion, as was SCART (I believe that uses 2 signal types, but can't remember what they are - probably composite + another), plus there's also S-Video, composite, component and probably others that I've forgotten.

CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 15th Sep 2011 01:26
S-video doesn't have much compatibility, if any at all, to be honest. Something of a dead format.

Mainly Scarts, RFs and Components for Analogue. Optical leads, HDMI and DVI for digital leads. But Opticals only do audio.

Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 15th Sep 2011 03:40
Thanks for your advice!

There is one game i play, it has perfect looking raycasting and is rendered at a very high FPS real time. This game i find very fun. What is this game? This game is life on earth.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-20 17:29:26
Your offset time is: 2025-05-20 17:29:26