Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Favorite Operating System Survey

Author
Message
Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 02:19
So i thought i would put a new twist on seeing what people's preferences are, this time i'd like to take a survey on people's favorite OS's, be it a desktop or mobile OS. You can also vote on a specific version of an operating system, so for example, instead of saying 'windows' you can say 'vista' or 'XP' but if you just say windows that's fine, and the same goes for any other OS.

Examples are Windows, Ubuntu, Linux Mint, iOS, Android, OSX, etc.

Frequently ill update with a post stating the percentage of people that like so and so operating system.

Here's my vote, iOS! Haha Windows lovers are going to hate me for that!

Fuzz
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Nov 2006
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 02:41
Windows - Torn between XP and 7.

Off topic: How's B3 going?


mm0zct
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Nov 2003
Location: scotland-uk
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 02:43
So your favourite OS runs on CISCO network hardware?



Personally I'm a Fedora14 person for work, and Windows XP for play (except for the lack of DX11 support, which means I have to use Windows 7, which is pretty good too).

I'm not a big fan of Gnome3 or Unity however, so going further with Fedora may mean switching to XFCE.

Favourite mobile OS is Maemo 5 (which runs on the Nokia n900, it's basically Debian with a nice UI iirc, full X11 server etc.)

AMD AthlonX2 5000 black edition @2.8ghz, 4gb pc5400, AMD/ATi hd3850, creative xfi music, 24" hp widescreen 1920x1200 + 22" zalman trimon 3D 1680x1050, ECS KA3 MVP mobo
Kezzla
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Aug 2008
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 02:46
I like windows 7 so far.

but overall, taking into account the time it was released and what it came from, windows xp was brilliant. I think back and cant believe how the world accepted windows 98 crashing as much as it did.

xp came along and it only ever crashed once on me outside of user stupidity... until 7 came out after which it continued updating and mysteriously became far less stable... coincidence?

Sometimes I like to use words out of contents
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 03:26 Edited at: 13th Oct 2011 03:36
A difficult choice, I use Windows 7, Ubuntu and have iOS on my iPod. But out of the operating systems I've used, I'd probably actually go out and say...MacOSX. I found it was nice and clean and responds exactly as I want it to, it felt ergonomic and sensible to me, but also quite intuitive. If I make the switch to AppGameKit, then as an operating system it'll pretty much be compatible with everything I need.

The downside is, whenever I've been on the look out for a computer I've kept it pretty low budget (due to not having a lot to spend), except one time when I decided to take the gaming laptop route and in hindsight it was a poor choice. The laptop I bought died after 1 year, the MacBook my sister bought the same day for the same price is still going (3, going on 4 years) and needed a replacement battery (exceeded its charges) and cable (wear and tear) last week and she was able to do that for £50. Okay this is about OS rather than hardware but just pointing out I could be using the OS I preferred but didn't so in the long run I ended up spending a lot more money. The difference in spec was the extra 1gb RAM and a Geforce 9500M instead of intergrated.



Out of the Windows, I'd say Windows 7, from the start is the best. I know XPers won't like it. My history is: Windows 95 - not bad, from what I remember - don't think I encountered any problems, Windows 98 - hell on a plate, Windows XP - to begin with, hell on a plate for me, when SP2 came out the problems I had were solved and was very stable after that, Windows Vista - never had a problem, but felt very clunky and at times seemed to not perform brilliantly well, Windows 7 - beta and RC ran without trouble, ran a lot better than Vista (on the same comp) and the beta and RC felt really stable and straight out of the box with my Lenovo, Windows 7 Professional has just worked and it has worked efficiently, no problems, no performances issues - nada and this laptop is lower spec than my last one (which Vista didn't perform brilliantly on).

So I like Windows 7 so much that it actually made the answer to question in the survey difficult to answer. Windows XP SP2 would make it difficult too, but given my horror prior to SP2, I think it would have knocked off plenty of points.

WLGfx
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Nov 2007
Location: NW United Kingdom
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 04:53
Amigos OS on the A1200...

Oh, were we talking about PC's? Then it's XP...

Mental arithmetic? Me? (That's for computers) I can't subtract a fart from a plate of beans!
Warning! May contain Nuts!
Eminent
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Jul 2010
Location:
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 04:55
Win7.
Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 05:06 Edited at: 13th Oct 2011 05:06
Quote: "Off topic: How's B3 going?"
It's going good! Just made my first electrical diagram the other night and i will improve it tonight as well as maybe convert it to a PCB layout! Soon i will have it printed then i will assemble and test the board to make sure it works, it'll just be a board for the controllers though so not the main mother board, but it's a step closer to that!

Well i have found Win 7 to be extremely stable, it has never crashed in the two years i have used it. As stated, XP was absolutely genius! One of the best OS's MS has ever made imo.

Da_Rhyno
13
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th May 2011
Location:
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 05:19
IonOS on the TI-83 calculator. It helped me pass the time in my classes in high school. *coughMarioZeldaGalaxianOnACalculatorcough*
Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 06:19
Lol TI-BASIC is a nice language! Never heard of IonOS though!

Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 06:25
I can't really say I have a favourite... I use what I happen to have installed, which is currently Vista.



Support a charitable indie game project!
Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 06:36
Oh boy...

The problem is, I like all 3 for all different reasons.

Currently, my absolute favorite is Mac OS X...I don't own a Mac yet, but I'm going to be getting one very soon.

Currently, on my laptop I use Windows 7. Honestly, though, I kind of miss XP a lot. It was stable, it ran DBPro without a hitch and ever since moving to 7, I just miss the simplicity of XP. Thus, my favorite version of Windows is XP.

I also use Ubuntu occasionally, more or less for the geek feeling of it. But I also like what Linux stands for, and someday I hope to make games for the OS.


^ Click for my Deviant page!
Hodgey
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 06:50
Windows 1.0 is where it's at!

But seriously, Windows 7 is probably my favourite because I'm used to using it. I haven't really used Mac OS X to it's full extent and Ubuntu just doesn't have enough stuff made for it IMO.

Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 07:17
Quote: "Windows 1.0"
You got the pre-release?? I thought the first version to the public was 1.1! Lol kidding but really, windows 1.1 is just the best!

Da_Rhyno
13
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th May 2011
Location:
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 07:21
Quote: "Lol TI-BASIC is a nice language! "


Right now you are my best friend!

Quote: "Never heard of IonOS though!"


Pretty much it was a program that you could run that would take full control of your calculator, with it's own API and everything (in Z80 ASM of course), and allow you to run programs written for it.
Da_Rhyno
13
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th May 2011
Location:
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 07:23
Quote: "Amigos OS on the A1200...
"


I actually have an Amiga 500 sitting in my basement along with a TI99-4/A.

...I wonder if they still work.
Hodgey
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 08:44
Quote: "You got the pre-release?? I thought the first version to the public was 1.1!"

Yep, I'm a legend in the Microsoft world.

Back to reality, I have no idea. I just jumped onto wikipedia and looked for the earliest version of windows. The earliest version of windows I've actually used is windows 98.

Grog Grueslayer
Valued Member
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th May 2005
Playing: Green Hell
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 10:00
I really miss DOS because I had a lot of fun programming my own menu system with icons that ran .bat files... but I'm fine with using Vista.

Quel
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Mar 2009
Location:
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 10:34
Windows XP, Microsoft has arrived with it. No need for moving on. All the successors are stupid marketing moves to keep the killer hardware industry its job.

I tried Linux once, and i only remember that i couldn't do anything on it what a liked to do on Windows.

-In.Dev.X: A unique heavy story based shoot'em ~35%
-CoreFleet: An underground commander unit based RTS ~15%
-TailsVSEggman: An Sonic themed RTS under development for idea presentation to Sega ~15%
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 13:17
Quote: "Amigos OS on the A1200..."


I used to have a 500+ and it was awesome. I miss Amiga, it was my first computer.

xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 16:03 Edited at: 13th Oct 2011 16:03
Quote: "I really miss DOS because I had a lot of fun programming my own menu system with icons that ran .bat files."


Ahh, the good ole days. DOS 6.2 - Now that was a stable OS. I can't remember ever crashing that!

Brian.

Daniel TGC
Retired Moderator
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Feb 2007
Location: TGC
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 16:07 Edited at: 13th Oct 2011 16:10
I like iOS 5, it's simple, unbloated and has no boot time unless you reset or discharge the device. It can't get viruses, and doesn't have a ton of drivers to configure. It just sits there, does its job, and that's the end of it.

@xplosis

I've crashed DOS loads of times, weird graphics on the screen, repeating pc speaker sounds, and total freezes. I've also seen boot errors related to DOS many times, forcing me to boot from a floppy because some idiot deleted command.com and io.sys
Grog Grueslayer
Valued Member
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th May 2005
Playing: Green Hell
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 18:54 Edited at: 13th Oct 2011 19:15
Quote: "forcing me to boot from a floppy because some idiot deleted command.com and io.sys"


The first time I ran into that problem I changed the attributes of command.com to read-only and system using ATTRIB to make sure it cannot be deleted again. Why Microsoft thought command.com should be able to be deleted is beyond me.


@ Xplosys:

I actually have a funny story about DOS 6.2. When it came out I was using DOS 6.0 and I desperately wanted 6.2... why was there such a desire I don't know but I called Casey (the great friend of mine that told about Darkbasic) to see if he knew anybody that may have DOS 6.2. He said he didn't know for sure but some kid at school might have it... so we drive to our High School to see him after school. When we met him he said "I don't but Joel might have it." I asked for his address and we went to his house.

Completely out of character for me Casey and I knock on his door and I say "You don't know me but I heard you might have DOS 6.2... can I get a copy of it?". Dumbfounded he says "I don't know you want to check our computer?". I say "Yeah.". So he lets two complete strangers in his house to look on his computer. I booted up his computer and nope... DOS 6.0 but I noticed on his desk a DOS 6.2 labeled disk. Then his step-mom walks in (I thought it was his mom of course) and she looks mad. She says "What are you doing on my computer?" I look up at her from the chair and say "I'm just here to get DOS 6.2." She bellows "What? Get out." I smugly reply "Look, I know you don't have it on the computer but it's right here. I can install it for you and I can copy it and then I'll get out." She then said something I'm not going to write but you get the picture. Needless to say I didn't get DOS 6.2 that day but I made a friend that was very impressed that I gave his step-mom some grief.

A few months later Joel admitted to me he thought I was there to beat him up 'cause somebody told him he'd have somebody go after him. I guess he was so relieved I didn't hit him that he let us in.

old_School
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Aug 2009
Location:
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 19:39 Edited at: 13th Oct 2011 19:41
well my fav OS of all time would be Windows 98. Currently I use Win7 but Windows 98 was my fav of all time. Back in the day it was just so powerful and graceful. To me it was like digital art pressed into a OS. For its time, Windows 98 was Boss!!!!

Edit:
Fun fact


Microsofts first Os was a Unix based OS they sold to IBM. They used that money to purchase the rights to DOS and later made MS-DOS which went into Windows 3X and above.
BlackFox
FPSC Master
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th May 2008
Location: Knight to Queens Bishop 3
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 20:33
Quote: "Ahh, the good ole days. DOS 6.2 - Now that was a stable OS. I can't remember ever crashing that!"


DOS 6.22 and Windows for Workgroups. I run it on our VMWare from time to time. And then there's Novell.

Ahh the good old days.


Twitter: @NFoxMedia
ionstream
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2004
Location: Overweb
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 21:28
Windows 7, but I have been liking Xubuntu/Archlinux with Xfce4 so far. I don't know why Gnome is the standard desktop environment when Xfce4 does everything it does faster!

bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 13th Oct 2011 22:02
@Grog. Awesome story! I love reading stuff like that.

Anyway, I prefer Linux but I use windows for most things. I use Linux for any server purposes though. (I got 3 servers running right now )


Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 14th Oct 2011 06:06
I will get the numbers when this reaches 40 posts!

Daniel TGC
Retired Moderator
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Feb 2007
Location: TGC
Posted: 14th Oct 2011 16:53 Edited at: 14th Oct 2011 16:56
Quote: "well my fav OS of all time would be Windows 98. Currently I use Win7 but Windows 98 was my fav of all time. Back in the day it was just so powerful and graceful. To me it was like digital art pressed into a OS. For its time, Windows 98 was Boss!!!!"


I was on the Microsoft Windows 98 support team down at sevenoaks, they contracted support calls out to the ICL center down there.

I still have nightmares about it. That was my first professional IT support job. If you phoned me than I apologise! I actually had a customer wait on the phone while I reinstalled outlook express because I'd uninstalled it while talking to another customer. :S in retrospect why they let me on the desks in a mystery, I can only imagine that they were that hard up for staff. I just walked into the interview room with a little DOS knowledge, and got the job. The training consisted of two week course (I was told at the interview) crammed into 3 days, and 1 days customer service training.

Amazingly I lasted 6 months in that job before moving onto NTL in newport... well that's enough about my tragic job history lol.

Either way, Windows 98 has scared me for life. If I never see the OS again, it'll be too soon!!!!!!

P.S. wasn't windows 98 the one that blue screened on bill gates at it's launch event?
bruce3371
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Aug 2010
Location: Englishland
Posted: 14th Oct 2011 16:58
My favourite OS would be a toss up between Ubuntu (I've just upgraded to 11.10) and Windows XP; Ubuntu for its performance and ease of use (I'm a quick learner lol), and XP for its stability.

Kezzla
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Aug 2008
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Posted: 14th Oct 2011 18:06
Its a bit of a no brainer, however I like how (until now(sorry)) windows ME has not had a single mention in this thread. A truely terrible os and only lasted a week on my system before I had nothing but obscenity to describe it. I vote windows ME for a -1 vote in this survey.

kezzla

Sometimes I like to use words out of contents
bruce3371
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Aug 2010
Location: Englishland
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 01:08
Quote: "windows ME has not had a single mention in this thread"


Funny you should say that...

My PC is a multi boot system, with 3 hard drives, each with its own OS.

1st HDD has ME on it for all my retro gaming needs, 2nd HDD has XP on it for all other gaming and FPSC, 3rd HDD has Ubuntu on it for all other purposes.

My ME partition has been running smoothly since I installed it 3 years ago, I've had absolutely no problems with it at all!

zenassem
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Mar 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 05:51 Edited at: 15th Oct 2011 06:02
I found this tour through time enjoyable. Can't believe how many I remember using, as well as some I never knew about.
http://2bored4fun.blogspot.com/2009/04/operating-system-interface-design-from.html

Have to say that NeXTSTEP looked way advanced for the time.
and go figure... The NeXT Computer (also called the NeXT Computer System) was a high-end workstation computer developed, manufactured and sold by Steve Jobs' company NeXT from 1988 until 1990

NeXTSTEP / OPENSTEP 1.0 (released in 1989)


+++++

GEM (for Atari ST) was my first GUI OS

Fact I didn't know...
As Atari had provided most of the development of the 68k version, they were given full rights to continued developments without needing to reverse-license it back to DRI, who had apparently lost interest in the 68000 platform. As a result, the Apple-DRI lawsuit did not apply to the Atari versions of GEM, and they were allowed to keep a more Mac-like UI.

Your signature has been erased by a mod please reduce it to 600 x 120.
Daniel TGC
Retired Moderator
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Feb 2007
Location: TGC
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 06:08 Edited at: 15th Oct 2011 06:13
The problem with 98 and ME is that their initial pre-service pack versions were truly terrible. There was massive issues with many pieces of hardware, now they've had time to fix alot of this both systems are reasonably stable. But their reputation from that initial period stuck. That's why for most of my 9x computing life I stuck with windows 95 OSR 2.5, it was the most stable, and supported the new FAT32 file structure. It also lacked all the themes and extra processes that caused endless problems. Honestly to this day, themes have caused more problems for me than any other Microsoft technology. And with the exception if system tools you only needed should things go wrong, there wasn't enough extra features to the system to make me really adopt it. there was no real benefit to having themes on my system either. I've always been more concerned with the stability of my system then how it looked.

But I never ever saw any point in Windows ME at all. It was released next to the far superior windows 2000 professional. ME may have been more visually appealing, but when windows 2k turned up most of the technical issues I was having vanished. I still regard it as the single most innovative and successful windows release ever.
Deathcow
FPSC Reloaded Backer
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Nov 2005
Location: Right here!
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 06:33
MSDos was my first Operating system and one I really liked. My favour GUI for DOS was DR GEM. I still have a machine setup for DOS/GEM, but now I have been using FreeDOS. Everything worked and having lots of extended memory didn't mean as much as it does now, as most programs really only needed around 500KB to run. I remember spending countless days manually optimizing the memory setup just to free up a couple of KBs.

I still have many of my DOS programs and I still use some of them. Like Works 2, Neobook, Neopaint and GEM Artline 2.

I vote DOS/PCGEM

DC

Grog Grueslayer
Valued Member
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th May 2005
Playing: Green Hell
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 07:40
@ Jerico2day:

Thanks.


@ Daniel TGC:

Almost every time Bill Gates displays a new Windows to crowds he gets the blue screen of death.

bruce3371
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Aug 2010
Location: Englishland
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 16:24
Quote: "Almost every time Bill Gates displays a new Windows to crowds he gets the blue screen of death."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzFUcDKC64E

Classic video!!

@ Daniel TGC What can I say? I like eye candy lol

I honestly cant remember having any real problems with ME when it first came out either, I guess I must have been one of the lucky few! But, yeah, in terms of the amount of people who did have problems with it, ME was probably the worst of all versions of Windows.

(In my last post, I should have made it clear that I re-installed ME 3 years ago, I also used it when it first came out).

zenassem
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Mar 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 17:50 Edited at: 15th Oct 2011 17:52
Quote: "I honestly cant remember having any real problems with ME when it first came out either, I guess I must have been one of the lucky few! But, yeah, in terms of the amount of people who did have problems with it, ME was probably the worst of all versions of Windows."


Sometimes home-users do alright with "botched" OS's (98 [prior to Second Edition], ME, Vista) becuase of limited amount of hardware and software and network architecture, relatively speaking. Take that same OS into a(n) institution/corporate/municipality deployment across thousands of systems and all the demons show themselves. I personally thought NT was stable, Windows 2000 Advanced Server worked well. I think most IT people cringe at the thought of their environment adopting a new OS, even client side. I know I did.

Your signature has been erased by a mod please reduce it to 600 x 120.
Grog Grueslayer
Valued Member
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th May 2005
Playing: Green Hell
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 20:03
@ Bruce3371:

My experience with ME has always been it's a ticking timebomb. 99% of them I've seen have all crashed so badly they take the motherboard, and sometimes the HD with them. You're definitely blessed.

NickH
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th May 2008
Location: Nova Prospekt, North Yorks, UK
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 20:10
I always liked AmigaOS and it took me a very long time to own anything that ran MS stuff. I had just about every accessorie for it including PPC, SCSI graphics card, sound card Zip drive...pretty much everything I could plug into it.

Now I own a Windows 7 PC which is slowly taking the same shape. Windows 7 isn't perfect (and I own the top end 64bit version), but it's the best Windows I've ever used by far.

www.illuminatedfx.com
For web design and custom GUI and 3D model design services.
Chris Tate
DBPro Master
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Aug 2008
Location: London, England
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 20:34 Edited at: 15th Oct 2011 20:43
I'm still using Windows XP. I have Windows 7 on my laptop; but I develop my games on XP.

In order of preference:

1: Windows XP Professional (For stability, given its age; I must admit I often faced that blue screen of death in the early service packs but I haven't seen that screen in years)

2: Windows 7 (A nice looker; no major issue with it; just a little disappointed with all this admin rights stuff regarding older software; I'm the only user and I need to set program administration rights. . Maybe I'm being a little ignorant here)

3: Windows 2000 (Pretty much an older similar version of XP professional)

4: Mac OS (I'm not a Mac user, but I must show some respect for their magnificent operating system. The only reason why I wouldn't buy a Mac is because I need to build for Windows PCs, and test for Windows PCs with Windows PCs. However, it could have been the other way around; where Microsoft builds operating systems for its own hardware, and Apple built operating systems for every Tom, Dick and Harry's computer factory.

5: Windows 98 (My old favourite, although 2000 was better for networking from my perspective. The only reason I uninstalled it was because of .NET development and XP)

5: Windows 95 (Because of the start menu)

6: Windows 3.1 (This is the first one I used; always wondered what 3.0 was like. Never experienced a system crash!)

7: DOS 6 (To this day, every person out there who uses Windows at one point in their lives will have to use the Command Prompt; which is pretty similar; if not the same as DOS. I do not remember a DOS program ever crashing.)

6: Windows ME [Millenium] (Perhaps this was released because of the millenium and not because it actually works)

7: Windows Vista (I think they got trigger happy with the new presentation foundation [which came out on XP by the way]; I'm fed up of people calling me to come help them fix their computers, never do I need to ask what operating system they have. I don't care about transparent 3D windows, I want to run my software please thank you)

zenassem
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Mar 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 21:32 Edited at: 15th Oct 2011 22:57
I think I get confused these days, and perhaps I always have been, with defining an OS, and making distinctions between the core OS/kernel/services/tools apps and what I sometimes consider separate parts such as... the 'file manger (App)', the console/command shell, GUI/Desktop.

Even the kernel, though at the heart of the OS, cannot be considered an OS by itself without describing some of the services/tools/and other apps developed by way of the kernel. The kernel is responsible process management, memory management, hardware device drivers, filesystem drivers, network management and numerous other things, but can even that actually mean OS?

When we talk OS are we talking about about everything? I think for the most part we all can 'assume' we know what is meant by Windows 7, but it's not as clear to me when one name's a linux distro, for instance.

With all the different options from desktop choices/GUI, shells, file-managers; the configuration of one could be a vast departure/experience than someone else.

What does it mean if someone states even something as specific as, "I prefer Ubunutu 11.10 'Oneiric Ocelot'"? That statement alone hardly addresses/describes the users setup. I have had terrible Ubuntu setups (from 'Maverick Meerkat' to 'Lucid Lynx'), and I have had fantastic setups/experiences; with everything in between all along the way.

Even in some past "MS WindowS" versions, I tended to use some combination of different shells, desktop managers, things to alter the GUI such as "drapes" apps or things like windows "blinds", launch docks/gadgets/widgets (I'm starting to feel like Willy Wonka), as well as varios higher level apps such as web-browsers (Netscape Navigator, Opera, Mozilla Firefox, IE, Chrome).

I never 'really' considered the browser as part of the OS, but then Windows even blurred those lines IMHO. IIRC it became more noticeable to me with the release of XP. The integration on some level altered something that I considered an APP, into something that I would define as part of the OS.

If that weren't confusing enough.... Now we see browsers integrating an OS into them... Google Chrome OS, and Chromium OS.

So is it just me, or does anyone else have a hard time defining what is meant by OS?

Your signature has been erased by a mod please reduce it to 600 x 120.
Chris Tate
DBPro Master
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Aug 2008
Location: London, England
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 21:48
Indeed

An operating system is defined by user settings; I guess it starts off as a generic (factory setup) OS that turns into a user defined system or a user defined mess.

I tend to avoid changing much; I still have the green grass and the blue taskbar. But still with my case, I like my folders to open in the same window and I like them to reopen automatically after the system reboots.

I remember when I was little; I used to change the Windows boot logo, just for the sake of it.

bruce3371
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Aug 2010
Location: Englishland
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 22:12
Quote: "Sometimes home-users do alright with "botched" OS's (98 [prior to Second Edition], ME, Vista) becuase of limited amount of hardware and software and network architecture, relatively speaking. Take that same OS into a(n) institution/corporate/municipality deployment across thousands of systems and all the demons show themselves. I personally thought NT was stable, Windows 2000 Advanced Server worked well. I think most IT people cringe at the thought of their environment adopting a new OS, even client side. I know I did."


Quote: "My experience with ME has always been it's a ticking timebomb."


I've got to be honest, whenever I've upgraded my hardware and/or drivers, with ME I've always felt a bit nervous, never knowing whether or not it will behave itself. So I do tend to treat it with kid gloves!

I've also got to bear in mind the fact that whatever hardware I use, has to be able to run in 3 different OSs, so I'm always very carefull when I do upgrade, making sure to only install one thing at a time, checking that it's working properly each time.

The same goes with any software I install on my partitions. Of all of them, my XP partition has grown to be the most bloated, and consequently takes the longest to boot. Ubuntu boots the quickest, with ME being the happy medium lol.

DevilLiger
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Nov 2003
Location: Fresno,CA,USA
Posted: 15th Oct 2011 22:59
i like windows 7,XP, and then Android. I didn't like the mac OS ones because they take alot of getting used to and feels limited compared to windows.

Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 16th Oct 2011 01:57 Edited at: 16th Oct 2011 02:02
All this talk of retro Windows has gone and made me do something reckless with Windows 7.



Windows is so much simpler in classic mode and everything runs more smoothly, whilst I am a whore for flashy things, Windows Classic mode has a sense of nostalgia...plus extra performance without rendering all that Aero crap. Though this is just for nostalgia's sake because I don't do anything that makes my laptop chug and Windows 7 performs fine. Windows Vista on the other hand, I used to switch to Classic Mode if it was deciding to be bloated, which was probably the only thing that I didn't like about it.


[edit]
I might even take it to the next step and go 800x600, I remember 1024x768 blew my mind the first time I used it.

[edit2]
No I don't think I could ever go back to 800x600, it looks aweful...

Kezzla
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Aug 2008
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Posted: 16th Oct 2011 02:09
Quote: "No I don't think I could ever go back to 800x600, it looks aweful..."

lol

Sometimes I like to use words out of contents
WLGfx
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Nov 2007
Location: NW United Kingdom
Posted: 16th Oct 2011 02:23 Edited at: 16th Oct 2011 02:28
XP at least gives you more of a screen to look at as well as being the most reliable.

Vista and 7 seem to place all these fancy graphics and larger areas for users to click on, why? Who needs spinning screens, menus and such? So what that things look 3D, fade out nice and the animations are 'cool'.

The internet has always provided downloads to fancy up your windows experience without the need to upgrade to a newer version that isn't fast or reliable. Blinds, sidebars, etc.

Windows 98 was always notorious, switch on your PC, go have a bath, cook tea, come back and it'll be ready to load up notepad.

Seems that people are warming to Windows 7 but I haven't had the full experience of it yet. I really do hope for those that are stuck with it that it is as reliable as XP has always been.

EDIT: Another vote for AmigaOS though... he he

Mental arithmetic? Me? (That's for computers) I can't subtract a fart from a plate of beans!
Warning! May contain Nuts!
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 16th Oct 2011 03:13
Quote: "
Windows 98 was always notorious, switch on your PC, go have a bath, cook tea, come back and it'll be ready to load up notepad.

Seems that people are warming to Windows 7 but I haven't had the full experience of it yet. I really do hope for those that are stuck with it that it is as reliable as XP has always been."


You are without a doubt spot on. Heck I got that with XP as well...pre service pack.

I've found Windows 7 to be reliable and haven't once thought, "I could do with Windows XP again". As far as compatibility goes, some old stuff I have runs without a problem, some have required tweaks and there's a Windows XP mode if you have 7 Professional or better for anything that isn't compatible, though nothing I use is incompatible so I can't vouch for how successful XP mode is, but it's just a virtual machine, so I suspect there's nothing extra that's special about it. I've found it to be more compatible than Vista, for example in Windows Vista I had to make a few tweaks to get FFVIII to run and further tweaks to reduce graphical glitches, but in 7 it ran straight from install with some very minor graphical glitches.

Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 17th Oct 2011 01:09
People talk about how ME crashes all the time but my dad has an ME computer that is on all day every day for the past ten years and it has never crashed and is always very responsive! Haha he has a 20 gigabyte hard drive and in the day he bought it that was quite a bit!

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-20 14:54:39
Your offset time is: 2025-05-20 14:54:39