Xplosys:
If you prefer that as an analysis, you're welcome to use it.
The way I understood these different plots is that you have:
Man - a person, somebody of certain intelligence. Sometimes we might call an android a synthetic man. You might have these 2 entities against each other. Anything that can resemble or represent a man.
So Man against man.
Man against nature. It's is not like man against man or man against cyber-Schwarznegger. Nature can be disease, it could be a wild animal but if you were to use anthropomorphism, I would say the wild animal would be on the plot device of man against man, like Animal Farm.
Man against himself. This isn't the same as man against man, because these are personal conflicts. It could be self hate or even an internal journey. Heck, Jane Austin's Emma has this, because the character of Emma quite frequently had internal conflicts because she'd often reflect upon her self and criticise herself for certain things.
Man against God, this would be a fight based around faith. A man against God story could pose some similarities with the others. Ultimate I see this one as being about faith. I could be a story about a man who's lost his faith (or gets it back again), but it could also literally involve God. Heck, Bruce lost his faith in Bruce Almighty, but it took Morgan Freeman as God to help get it back.
Man against society. Society is actually an abstract. You might wish to argue that society is made up of people and therefore they are fighting the people. To a degree such stories may have the 2 plots go side by side. In the case of the Don Herzfeldt cartoon, there are no people Don is fighting against, it is norms in society, which makes his cartoons rejected. So it's the ideals of society he's fighting again. The only character is the animator. 1984 on the other hand, it's a fight against society and big brother.
Man caught in the middle. There's no against here. In Don Herzfeldt's Rejected, there is a stick man with a spoon and a bowl, he is not 'against' anything and nothing is against him, but he is caught between a meal and the means to eat that meal, as his spoon is too big. Hence, caught in the middle.
Man and woman. That's more of a coming together than a going against.
I'm sure you could compile them all down into one, I think somebody said, "something happens to someone", but I think it'd miss the point of the literary analysis. The idea of the 7 basic plots is to not say, "this is how unoriginal writing is" nor is it to say "this is how easy it is", or to make wild claims, it's to provide points for literary analysis by providing some very basic plot points that could be used as part of an analysis. Heck, it might even be useful for writers to think about their own plots. But there's all sorts of ways you can summarise parts of your story or even in thinking about how you're going to write the story.
What you do to achieve that? It's up to the writer or critic.
[edit]Looks like Comet beat me to something this time.
