Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Minor Forum Glitch: No New Post!

Author
Message
Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 28th Feb 2013 18:43 Edited at: 28th Feb 2013 18:46
I'm desperately trying to hold back all kinds of suggestions for forums fixes since Paul sorted out the tabs issue, don't want to make the TGC guys feel like if they fix one problem we bring up they have become our slaves! But this one is probably the most consistently annoying "feature" of the forum:



So?... Just show me the newest post then (like the link said), what's the fuss about? There's obviously some fail condition for finding an unread post because we end up here, so why send us to this page at all? Why not instead send us to the last post in the thread?


Attachments

Login to view attachments
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 28th Feb 2013 18:50
Agreed, I've never understood why it gives you an error page instead of just taking you to the last post in a thread. It doesn't even give you the option to go to the last post, either.

Religious knowledge, now there's an oxymoron...
The Zoq2
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Nov 2009
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posted: 28th Feb 2013 20:46
I agree, this is pretty anoying. From what I understand, the error appears when a person on post moderation posts, but you click the link before the post has been aproved
RedneckRambo
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2006
Location: Worst state in USA... California
Posted: 28th Feb 2013 20:55
Quote: "I agree, this is pretty anoying. From what I understand, the error appears when a person on post moderation posts, but you click the link before the post has been aproved"

There are other ways of course to. And one that I do nearly every single day and it drives me crazy. Sometimes I'll open the "newest post" in a seperate tab, then close that tab. If you try clicking newest post again, you get that error page. I've never understood why it doesn't just take you to the last post.

Words cannot describe my Greatness... But I'll give it a shot.

I am awesome....... Yeah, that works.
Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 28th Feb 2013 21:19
Quote: "There are other ways of course to. And one that I do nearly every single day and it drives me crazy. Sometimes I'll open the "newest post" in a seperate tab, then close that tab. If you try clicking newest post again, you get that error page. I've never understood why it doesn't just take you to the last post."

Yeah that's exactly what I did before making this thread.

PROGRAMMER SOLUTION: "Well why don't you just browse efficiently and not open so many tabs!?!"
Okay so I'm puppeteering here but I see this kind of obnoxious attitude from a lot of programmers. Seems like many programmers have control issues! *baddum tsh*


Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 28th Feb 2013 22:55
Efficient browsing is opening lots of tabs if you ask me, saves spamming the back button.


They see me coding, they hating. http://indi-indicium.blogspot.co.uk/
Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 09:40
The Zoq2 pretty much has it. I think what happens is this: If you open a thread where a post is waiting to be approved but there are posts after it the system thinks you have seen the thread. The post gets approved and the new post button appears, you click it but because you've already been in the thread previously the system thinks you've already seen it all.

BiggAdd
Retired Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2004
Location: != null
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 10:19
I think the message should be there, because some users actually might wonder why they can't find the new post after clicking the button.
(My experience as a web developer has taught me that users can be ruddy idiots sometimes!)

But there should be an option to disable that message in future I think! So it takes you to the newest post or last post (whichever is applicable).

Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 16:34 Edited at: 1st Mar 2013 16:34
Quote: "I think the message should be there, because some users actually might wonder why they can't find the new post after clicking the button.
(My experience as a web developer has taught me that users can be ruddy idiots sometimes!)"

That's true. How about this then?:



Attachments

Login to view attachments
TheComet
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2007
Location: I`m under ur bridge eating ur goatz.
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 16:45
Quote: "Efficient browsing is opening lots of tabs if you ask me, saves spamming the back button."


What? There's a back button?

TheComet

Blobby 101
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jun 2006
Location: England, UK
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 16:52
Obese, that would be perfect. It can't be too difficult to implement really, given that that kinda box already exists for trying to post duplicate posts.

TheComet
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2007
Location: I`m under ur bridge eating ur goatz.
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 17:24
This here is also pretty annoying. It occurs when a newbie edits their post:



TheComet

Brendy boy
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jul 2005
Location: Croatia
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 17:32
i think the same happens when someone edits their post and you click go to newest post, you don't actualy see the post that has been edited, instead you get that error page

Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 1st Mar 2013 18:58 Edited at: 1st Mar 2013 19:01
@Brendy Boy - That's another issue it would solve then.

@TheComet - Now that would probably take a bit more work to fix. Maybe the old message should display until the edit is approved? Then how would you do that? Store the edited version within a hidden class, alongside the unedited version, and when the post is approved the text outside the hidden class is automatically deleted and the class tags removed? Something like that might work?


Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-17 00:18:27
Your offset time is: 2025-05-17 00:18:27