Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Tomb Raider (2013 Reboot)

Author
Message
Dar13
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th May 2008
Location: Microsoft VisualStudio 2010 Professional
Posted: 28th Mar 2013 18:28
I give up.

Anyways, Tomb Raider seems really interesting but I gotta say that some of the death sequences were quite gruesome.

Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 28th Mar 2013 19:39
Quote: "Tomb Raider seems really interesting but I gotta say that some of the death sequences were quite gruesome."


Thats one of the good things... <3 I love the dead sequences



Whose eyes are those eyes?
mr Handy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Sep 2007
Location: out of TGC
Posted: 28th Mar 2013 21:07
Yeah, Conan OBrian was happy to see those
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCe8-1dbXZc

*** Merry Chuckmas! ***
mr Handy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Sep 2007
Location: out of TGC
Posted: 4th Apr 2013 15:10
Bump. It worth it!





*** Merry Chuckmas! ***
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 4th Apr 2013 16:52
thats some nice teeth she got there ^^

odd, but fairly cool - atleast for me x)



Whose eyes are those eyes?
mr Handy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Sep 2007
Location: out of TGC
Posted: 4th Apr 2013 17:02
@Quik
Quote: "Silence! I kill you! © Akhmed the Dead Terrorist"

That's what she probably could say

*** Merry Chuckmas! ***
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 8th Apr 2013 00:58 Edited at: 8th Apr 2013 11:50
I picked up the game today. Actually enjoying it so far, I've put aside that it's not going to be a traditional Tomb Raider game and more of an action adventure than an adventure, puzzle solving exploration game with a little action.

The graphics are pretty damn shiny too, I like the TresFX as well, though I have turned it off. This has been the first game I've encountered that's giving me lag when set to maximum settings at 1080p on my new machine. So it seems to be a useful game for benchmarks.

In fact, I've tried the benchmark:
On 'high' 1080p I get average of 50fps
On 'ultra' 1080p it's 30fps
On 'ultimate' 1080p it's 6fps

So I'm playing this game on ultra. To be honest the only noticeable difference between ultra and ultimate is TressFX, though I know it's not the only difference, TressFX isn't a massive resource hog, though it's a contributing factor.


Talking of bugs too, I had Lara's head go completely black in one cutscene.

I decided to record a video just to demonstrate how well the game runs on my card:


Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 10th Apr 2013 22:28
That 10 minutes was really entertaining. It's a real shame that as she "toughens up" she just loses all depth of character and becomes a mindless killing machine. Instead of character progression we get character regression as the modern frightened girl fighting to survive turns into the old emotionless Lara, I'm surprised her boobs didn't expand and triangulate as the game progressed.


Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 10th Apr 2013 22:55
Yeah, it has been pretty entertaining for me so far.

With regard to the characterisation, that is a shame, but I can see as this is meant as a 'this is how it all started' kind of thing, she would need to evolve into the old Lara, that said, I thought it was meant to be a makeover, so depth wouldn't hurt.

From what I've seen so far, the characterisation has been good and it's been easier to get into the game's storyline. Whilst I did love the older Tomb Raider games (Underworld being my favourite), but it was never for the plot and characterisation, it was for the exploration, mystery and puzzles.

Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 10th Apr 2013 23:47
Quote: "'this is how it all started' "

Yeah I don't understand this. I thought this was supposed to be a "reboot" so why are they clinging on to the crappy old Lara? I don't see why she has to become that.

I really like the new Lara, and the actress playing her is perfect. Lara is an intelligent, well-educated and privileged girl but she wants to prove herself, she doesn't want things handed to her any more, she doesn't want to be treated differently because she's female or because she's pretty, but she's also naive and her "rebellious" nature has landed her in the deep end of an ugly world that she'd been shielded from her whole life. She's a vulnerable character, but she's not hopeless.

I think she has the potential to be one of the best videogame characters ever, so long as they bring back her vulnerable side. It's good (and refreshing) to have a vulnerable protagonist in a single-player game, after all they are alone and should not be running around killing hundreds of "bad guys"; if you want a legitimate story anyway. When you have a character that has fears and emotions it opens up the game to deeper ideas.

There's no tension in games like Duke Nukem, because he's a cartoon action hero. There's no reason for Duke to fear anything, run for cover or sneak past anyone. The result is that the game mechanics are stunted because the protagonist is stunted as a character. That's why it's a shame to see Lara killing dozens of people, it doesn't fit her character and there's so much more that could be done with her.


Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 11th Apr 2013 00:06
I think with how Lara starts in the game, I think you are right. As you say, it's a reboot, they already took the risk with the gameplay, it wouldn't have been that much more of one to make a leap with the character.

But, I've yet to complete it, so it's hard to have an opinion on how the character develops, so I am kinda taking your word for it.

Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 11th Apr 2013 01:00
I haven't actually played it! Just watched a lot of gameplay and a few reviews on youtube.


Wolf
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Nov 2007
Location: Luxemburg
Posted: 11th Apr 2013 09:15
Quote: "I really like the new Lara, and the actress playing her is perfect. Lara is an intelligent, well-educated and privileged girl but she wants to prove herself, she doesn't want things handed to her any more, she doesn't want to be treated differently because she's female or because she's pretty, but she's also naive and her "rebellious" nature has landed her in the deep end of an ugly world that she'd been shielded from her whole life. She's a vulnerable character, but she's not hopeless."


And now she violently murders wildlife with a bow and machineguns people to death.

Quote: "I think she has the potential to be one of the best videogame characters ever, so long as they bring back her vulnerable side. It's good (and refreshing) to have a vulnerable protagonist in a single-player game, after all they are alone and should not be running around killing hundreds of "bad guys"; if you want a legitimate story anyway. When you have a character that has fears and emotions it opens up the game to deeper ideas."


You see, thats my problem with the game. They adress these things and thats great. I loved it when "Spec Ops: the line" did it but in this game... yeah! They just mention it, have her in pain and beaten down here and then but then drop it alltogether.
To be specific: its half assed.
Yahtzee from the snobs at the escapist magazine mentioned something else I did not quite put my finger on but irritated me about the entire new setup: She never really makes any choices, she just gets pushed around in these situations.
I would have liked the entire game a lot more if they would have chosen either to be videogame or cinematic experience and not attempt to do both. It could have been a great game with few intense fights and good puzzles rather than being uncharted with the occasional hint of humanity... and then going back to walzing through an enemie camp like the french foreign legion.

Its decent, dont get me wrong, but it does not have that much of an arc. At the risk of quoting the geeks from the escapist magazine again: "you cant throw a brick off a driving truck and call that an arc."

It would have been brilliant if you could have sneaked past most or kill them and if the game would have adressed it. Lara could have become some kind of murderous monster or a stronger girl and it could have affected the storyline. Like in many other games.
In dishonored, a game about an assassin, you have the option to never kill anyone.

This only bothers me because I like characters to be believable or at least believable in their own universe aswell. Cool heroes that are supposed to be good guys but still kill enough people to be concidered a natural disaster are just plain offensive to me.
Take for example "The escape from butcher bay" and "the Witcher 2". Both games where the blood is flowing but it is entirely plausible in these stories and that it happens to these characters.

Its still better than final fantasy where preteens in fetishwear murder dozens of elite soldiers though. A lot better.

Yes: Decent videogame! Really! Gorgeous looking videogame too... but very very videogame.



-Wolf

http://www.serygalacaffeine.com
Without struggle,no progress and no result.Every breaking of habit produces a change in the machine.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-16 18:24:50
Your offset time is: 2025-05-16 18:24:50