Sleep command - GameCreators Forum

Author

Message

PSY

Developer

7

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 3rd Jul 2016

Location: Laniakea Supercluster

Posted: 24th Dec 2016 01:18 Edited at: 16th Nov 2017 18:23

Link

Hi guys,

I was wondering whether I should use the SLEEP command or not.
I'm currently developing a retro 2D game for Android, and I have plenty of frames left.

Is it advisable to use this command?
Should I use it on Android only, or on all platforms?

Please enlighten me

PSY

PSY LABS Games
Coders don't die, they just gosub without return

Back to top

Profile PM Website

blink0k

Moderator

11

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 22nd Feb 2013

Location: the land of oz

Posted: 24th Dec 2016 03:08

Link

Rather than using sleep i would;
1. have a sleepmode flag
2. set setsyncrate() to some low number
3. count the frames until the sleep time has expired

Note: Doco says you shouldn't use the sleep() command to sleep for more than 17ms

Back to top

Profile PM

PSY

Developer

7

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 3rd Jul 2016

Location: Laniakea Supercluster

Posted: 24th Dec 2016 03:23 Edited at: 16th Nov 2017 18:23

Link

Thanks for your answer!

The sync rate is already at 30, I can't go lower because it would look laggy.

If the sync rate is set to 30 fps, but the main loop eats about 10 fps, there are 20 fps left, which are 'controlled' by SYNC().

My question is, does SYNC() automatically allocate the remaining processing time to other processes ( outside the application ), or do I have to use SLEEP() ?

PSY LABS Games
Coders don't die, they just gosub without return

Back to top

Profile PM Website

damothegreat

User Banned

Posted: 24th Dec 2016 21:26

Link

I believe all Sync really does is.

Rendering and updating

Renders whats on the back buffer (what we code to in the main loop) and updates it to the front buffer (what we see on screen)

Not sure about any other mechanics or secrets behind the command

Others may know or be able to answer better

My advise, I would not use Sleep() - cause this will cause lags.

Instead I would use the timer() and set a variable and when a certain frame is passed - do something so that when the sync() comes along, it knows what to draw to the front buffer (screen)

Using Tier 1 AppGameKit V2
Started coding with AMOS
Anything is possible if put mind to it

Back to top

Profile

PSY

Developer

7

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 3rd Jul 2016

Location: Laniakea Supercluster

Posted: 25th Dec 2016 01:18 Edited at: 16th Nov 2017 18:23

Link

I guess Sync does some other stuff, too, like handling mouse clicks and other global events.

I can use Sleep ( 10 ) and it doesn't lag at all.

Everything runs just fine...with and without Sleep.

I'm simply not sure if it's advisable to use Sleep at all in order to give other background applications processing time, or if that's not necessary.

My guess is that you should use it when you do some intense calculations without using SYNC, so the system doesn't hang...

PSY LABS Games
Coders don't die, they just gosub without return

Back to top

Profile PM Website

Ortu

DBPro Master

16

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Nov 2007

Location: Austin, TX

Posted: 25th Dec 2016 20:26

Link

I guess it really depends on if it is a 'nice' sleep or a blocking sleep.

If it is the former, in addition to giving processing time to other processes, it also uses less power as the cpu is allowed to rest. Conserving battery and running cooler can be big pluses.

If it is the latter, it will just add a busy delay in the app and not really give anything back to the system.

A single player RPG featuring a branching, player driven storyline of meaningful choices and multiple endings alongside challenging active combat and intelligent AI.
http://games.joshkirklin.com/sulium

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

NGP

AGK Developer

8

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 29th Dec 2015

Location: In the studio

Posted: 25th Dec 2016 20:45

Link

+1's to all the good advice above!

Base things on a timer if at all possible! When I first arrived at AppGameKit, it was easy to use the sleep command in place of a "pause" function (link to prime example in signature) but that can cause problems down the road. Some devices get confused and think the app has hung when using longer sleep times (remember the sheer variety of possible machines your app will be running on). Different systems will try and cope in different ways, not all pretty. Best to avoid that kind of confusion by writing your own functions now, not using the sleep command! Exactly what I'm working on at the moment!