That looks great on paper phillip - but the problem lays in people voting based on what they want, not on what they NEED.
This is where democracy pales compared to dictatorship. Dont get me wrong, im not saying we are worse off. But a -good- dictator who isnt a mad crazed evil person bent on world domination can be alot better for a country than a democracy. Its all about just because something is comfortable doesnt mean its good for you.
Take for example something like smoking (im a smoker) - it would be in the best interests of the general population for it to be banned. We would become healthier and fitter as a people in general. This is ignoring the loss of country funds for the sake of this example.
A choice to ban smoking would actually be the best thing for the PEOPLE of this country - but if some party put that in their policey would people vote for him? Hell no, they WANT to smoke, they LIKE smoking.
Take that example and apply it to all sorts of things. What the combination of people voting for adds up to is not what is best for the country, just the selfish wants of each person. Selfish needs I can live with, selfish wants? no.
Then add into the equation say 50% chavs (no offence people, i mean the really narrow minded, clubbing and sex and pot is all i care about chavs). What do they know about whats best for the country? They cant even tell whats best for themselfs half the time.
No, I wish what you said would actually work on anything but paper, but it doesnt.
Anyway i started this post ages ago and have only just finished because I have indeed been down to the polling station. What did I do there? Anyones guess
edit - just in closing, eventually if countries are going to strive to be a little bit more perfect and make the world a better place some things will have to happen here and there that people just wont like. Its comparable to working for your money.
[07:16:59-pm] « Sephnroth » you were dreaming about lee...
[07:17:13-pm] « Mouse » stfu
[07:17:22-pm] « Mouse » he was hanging himself lol