as I have stated a few times in this thread, and which no one will take up, is this simple equation Ts=SQRT(Df/16). It describes the law of a falling objects, including gravity and acceleration (freefall), in a vaccuum (ie no resistance from anything (air, collision with other objects etc). In english the equation reads:
Time In Seconds = The Square Root of Distance in Feet divided by 16
All three buildings collapsed at the speed of freefall in a vacuum. (both towers roughly 10 seconds each, and wtc7 6.5 seconds)If you dont believe me or any of the "conspiracy" documentaries, go obtain independent footage and time the 3 collapses yourself.
twin towers freefall:
The towers stood 1368 feet tall, making Df (distance in feet) 1368
Now with the above equation we can do some simple mathematics...
Ts = SQRT(1368/16)
Ts = SQRT(85.5)
Ts = 9.2
So, the time needed to freefall in a vacuum from 1368 feet is 9.2 seconds. The towers fell in 10 secs, how is that possible on earth (with air resistance), and with the floors pancaking (ie slamming into each other) causing more resistance and slight time delays, as the energy is transferred from the moving object to the standing objects (each floor). This is not possible. Even with the most conservative of estimates, the towers should have taken 40-50 seconds to collapse via pancaking. These collapse speeds are not possible on earth... except for in one instance....
Vacuum & No resistance:
During a controlled demolition you obtain both things needed to explain the freefall speeds, little or no physical resistance, and a vacuum. The explosives themselves create the vacuum within the structure's interior (ie hot gases expanding at incredible rates, forcing the air out of the structure), as well as cutting the structural vertical beams in a timed sequence, so as to allow each of the floors to falland not encounter the one below, as it is already moving dowwards. This timed pattern is fired on the entire vertical support system, allowing an unhindered freefall, and near perfect freefall-in-a-vacuum speeds.
Pyroclastic flow:
Had the building simply collapsed due to weakened steel from fire, and pancaked, we would have much longer fall times, and a much more coarse and higher standing debris pile (ie huge slabs of broken concrete). Instead we have all of the building's contents (concrete, office furniture, desks, computers, etc) pulverized into a fine powder, which flowed out from the collapses, and at one point on the south west side of manhattan, flowed out onto the Hudson river. How is this possible? It's not, unless explosives are used. Go watch a volcano eruption that includes a pyroclastic flow, and watch wide angle collapse videos - the debris flow is identical. Only a pyroclastic flow, containing the right amount of heat and air current (bed) could flow out onto water and travel forward across the water. You only get a pyroclastic flow from a building collapse, if explosives are used. Unless there is some volcano under the wtc site that I am not aware of?
Pentagon 757:
Unless you are looking at doctored photo's there is no 757 at the pentagon. Even if the pieces of scrap metal are from a 757, why is the damage so inconsistent with a 757 hitting the building? Where are the 2 12000lb. engines? where are the landing gear assemblies? Did they vaporize from a kerosine fire? Thats interesting, I recall seeing retail Kerosine Heaters for sale at any home improvement store. Are these for use one time only? Do they melt and disappear with each use? no of course not. Kerosine cannot melt or weaken steel sufficiently - period.
We can go on and on for days if you like about any point, grand or particular, bothers me not. The official story is a lie and it will be refuted, microscopic point for microscopic point if need be. Physics doesnt lie, only people do. The sooner everyone realizes that, the sooner we can have intelligent discussions and get to the truth.
