Quote: "If somebody dosent like you they just rate all your posts 1 star"
Thats why I suggested weighing the Rating. You could even take it to a per-user average.
This issue could also be circumvented by using the idea posted earlier about only giving positive votes. That way, even is someone REALLY didn't like you to the point where they bullied you on a forum then they worst they could do is simply not vote. Any vote they DID give you would count towards putting that topic higher.
Quote: "don't think a rating system is good."
Nicely elaborated.
Quote: "we had a rating system about 5 forums ago and it didnt work."
Indi - what was wrong with it? Did it suffer the rating spamming issue?
Quote: "I think stickie threads are good enough to hilite specific threads. Anything else and it will be too much"
I agree - sticky is fine for an individual thread... but it doesn't really work for older threads. There might be a fantastic old thread explaining how to use Advanced Terrain or something. That would never get stickied and 2 weeks after the last post, it would get lost in the depths of the forum. Mix into that the other thousand posts on that topic and your search box is slightly less usefull than it should be as you just end up with a list of topics and no idea which one is the "best".
Quote: "So you want this to be 1 step closer to a Vbulletin?"
Never used it - but why does speculation about introducing a feature mean we are taking steps closer to cloning a popular piece of BB Software? If a system works - why not use it (even if someone else is already using it)? Not the best arguement against a voting system in the world...
(I know you were not being 100% serious)
[center]