Quote: ""I prefer nVidia for one simple reason. Their numbering system. GPU Generation followed by a low - high number code. So, the 7300 is not as good as the 7600 or the 7800, however while the 6800 might be faster than the 7300, the 7300 supports later shader models and other graphical tricks. Also anything with an 8xxx is going to be direct X ten, so when the entry level cards (between 0 and 400) come out it will be as 8100 - 8400, the mid level cards will be between 8450 - 7750, and the high end cards will be between the 8800 and 8999 range. So you can quickily and easily assess the CPU's generation, plus it's speed and the range of PC that it will suit. I've looked at ATI's numbering system and still don't understand it!""
So does ATI? x550, X700, X850... x1300, x1550, x1600, x1900? Pretty simple to me also? SE (suck edition), Pro (intermediate), XT (extreme). I think it is much better then Nvidia because GS is weaker and XT is sometimes weakest and it varies on the cards generation. All in all they aren't hard to understand at all.
Quote: "Bwahaha none Linux user I take it?"
Actually, lately, there has been some decent support for ATI on linux, not directly from AMD-ATI but there are drivers now out there and you
can play 3d games on many ATI based cards flawlessly. Its not perfect yet but it is getting much better and almost on par with nvidia, its just much easier to install and nvidia driver for linux because there are automated installers but the performance is near what ATI is now on linux.
Quote: "Ati have graphic tweaking apps
Nvidia have none
Nvidia tend to give you a free game (a better idea on if they work)
Ati tend to be the more supported"
I take it you do not know much about video cards or marketing?