Quote: "Geekiness and reproduction are incompatible. That's just how humans are wired. So, intellectuals ponder the reasons that people don't think that they're interesting and write witty and scathing blog articles about how people should think, and the jocks are too busy drinking beer and hooking up with the ladies to care. Such is life."
You have accepted your fate as it seems. Not surprising - swimming upstream is harder than downstream. Going against society's typical views is always harder than just accepting them. Which brings me to another point - the fact that we repeat history way too many times for it to be coincidence - agree? How can we be so stupid?!
But geeks is the wrong word (my mistake entirely) to use to describe the intellectually endowed. I always thought that geeks refered to people who'd been rejected from society and ended up attempting to find solace in their own fantasy world. We've got computer game geeks, techno geeks, music geeks, book geeks, magic tricks geeks, fantasy life geeks etc... Any agreement?
Another question that has been lingering in my mind is this: take a moment to think back to the old old days when men and women were no more than cavemen and cavewomen. In such simple times, the most reliable factor for survival was physical strength - those who weren't physically strong were weened out - as Mr. Darwin so elegantly put it in his theories. BUT! now that physical fitness is no longer a
major factor and intellectual property is, would that eventually lead evolution to ween those without such capacity?
But to consider reproduction; obviously all positives have negatives and all objects have an opposite. Surely this can be applied to human beings as well (although not all the time)? Therefore, although in a small number, mentally adept individuals will continue to be produced.[quote]
Hello world tommorrow
