Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / How fast is you computer?

Author
Message
aluseus GOD
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2007
Location: I\'m here. Now I\'m there. I keep moving
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:27 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 02:35
Link


Use this code and tell me how fast your computer is. I got 2ms.

A little more CPU intensive now. I have 24ms.

alus.portbb.com go there.
[quote]A book. I hate books. book is stupid. I know that I need codes but I dont know the codes.[/quote} -zenicanin14 the stupidest user in the world.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
AndrewT
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:30 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 02:30
Link
I got 0ms I think you shoulda made it a little more CPU-intensive...

asdsdfaghkdlgahdfkj.
Back to top
Profile PM
Agent Dink
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:33 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 02:37
Link
1 ms.... you need a better time measure though I dunno... is it possible in db?

Like... it would be good to see partial milliseconds or something i dunno what the next step is... is it nanosecond?

EDIT. I got 0 ms the second time lol. Yeah this tells me nothing beyond the fact that everyone's computer is = to mine.

I suggest every make it do like 1billion loops just to get some higher numbers so we can realyl compare...

Ok, at 1billion loops I got 7197ms... Everyone should try that so we can compare better.

Warning: Please be advised. Geek Culture is under lockdown. All mods are set to Indi mode. Any and all topics WILL BE LOCKED. Post at your own risk!
Back to top
Profile PM
Lucifer
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Dec 2005
Location:
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:33
Link
i also got 0ms

Lord Voldemort needs no signature!
Back to top
Profile PM
aluseus GOD
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2007
Location: I\'m here. Now I\'m there. I keep moving
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:34
Link
just make the number in the for loop higher!

alus.portbb.com go there.
[quote]A book. I hate books. book is stupid. I know that I need codes but I dont know the codes.[/quote} -zenicanin14 the stupidest user in the world.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Benjamin
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:36
Link
Quote: "it would be good to see partial milliseconds or something i dunno what the next step is"

Microseconds.

Tempest (DBP/DBCe)
Multisync V1 (DBP/DBCe)
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Agent Dink
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:37
Link
Thank you Benjamin.

Warning: Please be advised. Geek Culture is under lockdown. All mods are set to Indi mode. Any and all topics WILL BE LOCKED. Post at your own risk!
Back to top
Profile PM
Keo C
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere between here and there.
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 03:50 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 04:13
Link
14 ms for his updated code.
AMD Athlon 64 2800+
1 GB of RAM.
Nothing else really matters...


Back to top
Profile PM Website
AndrewT
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 03:56
Link
12 ms for the updated one.

asdsdfaghkdlgahdfkj.
Back to top
Profile PM
SageTech
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Dec 2004
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 04:03
Link
0ms, woohoo!


Battle Legacy: Online Third Person Shooter
Look for it on the WIP Board!
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Agent Dink
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 04:10 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 04:10
Link
7ms on the updated one.

@sagetech post your specs

Warning: Please be advised. Geek Culture is under lockdown. All mods are set to Indi mode. Any and all topics WILL BE LOCKED. Post at your own risk!
Back to top
Profile PM
Chily Dog
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Nov 2004
Location: U.S.A.
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 04:17
Link
8 ms, alright!
Back to top
Profile PM Email
SageTech
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Dec 2004
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 04:20
Link
Specs are:

Vista Premium
Core 2 Duo @ 2ghz each
1 gig of ram


Battle Legacy: Online Third Person Shooter
Look for it on the WIP Board!
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Mnemonix
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Dec 2002
Location: Skaro
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 04:31
Link
My computer is about 100 mph if I put it on a train

TheSturgeon(playing me at chess) : I will use my powers of the horse and pwnzor you.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
hyrichter
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 05:15
Link
7 ms
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
1 gb RAM
Win XP Pro Service Pack 2

Interesting thing is, it doesn't make any difference if I have Winamp playing or not, the time is still around the same, 7-9 ms.

CodeSurge
Version 1.0 finally released! Code your DBP projects in style. (And save the kittens!)
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Guyra
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 08:02 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 08:04
Link
7 ms

Right now I have no idea about my computer specs because I'm using a lousy processor and graphics card. My actual CPU is in a friends computer until I get a new graphics card. I've got 2GB of RAM, though.

Computer is also quite warm now. Haven't restarted it for about 30 hours, and it stands right next to the heater.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
SimSmall
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Aug 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 10:46 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 11:01
Link
0 ms
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (Single Core)
1 GB RAM
Windows 2000

...Quite an old computer, really, and somehow it's beaten a lot here...

Based on Dink's idea, I got it to run 1 thousand million times (10^9) with 8844 ms --- and 1 billion (10^12) I'm still waiting for

(I put actual numbers to so people don't get confused with long and short scale billions, personally I'm a long scale-r)
Back to top
Profile PM Email
dark coder
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Oct 2002
Location: Japan
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 11:05
Link
Because if anything this is a memory test, addition isn't exactly the most strenuous CPU operation you can perform. Why not just make another 3D Mark thread, as that tests most parts of a PC quite well.

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Mr Makealotofsmoke
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Dec 2006
Location: BillTown (Well Aust)
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 11:19
Link
i would run it but i dont have DB

YAY, We Got Our MUSIC BOARD!!!!
Back to top
Profile PM Email
aluseus GOD
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2007
Location: I\'m here. Now I\'m there. I keep moving
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 13:34
Link
guess i better make it more difficult huh?

alus.portbb.com go there.
[quote]A book. I hate books. book is stupid. I know that I need codes but I dont know the codes.[/quote} -zenicanin14 the stupidest user in the world.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 14:31
Link


ADD, MUL, DIV, SQRT, SUB; the 5 basic Integer Operations
Athlon64 X2 3200+ did it in 248ms

I made code somewhere on the forums that shows you how to calculate the integer processing power of your CPU as well as it's rough MHZ performance as well. It wasn't very accurate (in-fact often out by about 10%) but was good enough for pure DBP code.

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Guyra
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 15:41
Link
With Raven's test I got 175 ms.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
hessiess
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2007
Location: pc!
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 19:20 Edited at: 5th Nov 2007 19:25
Link
dooing this is almost completely pointless as a benchmark, especially on multi core cpu's because dbp is only single threaded. a better test would be something like rendering the default scene in blender, with the threads set to the number of cores you have.

benchmarks also vary depending on the oparating system you are using. and if its m$ windows how long since you reinstalled the os

learn blender, you will never regret it.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Deathead
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Oct 2006
Location:
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 19:33
Link
14ms. Thats bad isn't it.

[center]
Back to top
Profile PM Email
aluseus GOD
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2007
Location: I\'m here. Now I\'m there. I keep moving
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 19:52
Link
which example death? I think its good.

alus.portbb.com go there.
[quote]A book. I hate books. book is stupid. I know that I need codes but I dont know the codes.[/quote} -zenicanin14 the stupidest user in the world.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 20:36
Link
On the new one, I get 14ms on a four and a half year old computer that was cobbled together from a pile of dead computers. It's a single core Athlon running at 1836mhz. With 512mb of 200mhz RAM.


Since the other one was scaring you guys so much...
Back to top
Profile PM Website
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 20:40
Link
i'd participate but my pc is dead at the moment.
hopefully that will change in about an hour.

My DBP plugins page is now hosted [href]here[/href]
Back to top
Profile PM
dab
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Sep 2004
Location: Your Temp Folder!
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 21:11
Link
Quote: "How fat is you computer?"


How dare you!!??
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
IanM
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Sep 2002
Location: In my moon base
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 21:44
Link
Can I ask what the point of this is?

Great, you might have a fast processor, but if you have slow memory or a small amount of primary/secondary cache it's still gonna run like a dog.

Also, as you are running this in a multitasking/multiprocess environment, your timings could be massively wrong too - every time the OS needs to run another process it could switch yours out. That's not only when a user process wants to do something, but also when your AV program or any of your drivers decide they need to do something.

What you're really testing here is how much is left over by all the crap you have installed, in processor-only terms

Really, don't bother.

Utility plugins collection and
http://www.matrix1.demon.co.uk for older plug-ins and example code
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
aluseus GOD
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2007
Location: I\'m here. Now I\'m there. I keep moving
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 00:06
Link
174ms for me!

alus.portbb.com go there.
[quote]A book. I hate books. book is stupid. I know that I need codes but I dont know the codes.[/quote} -zenicanin14 the stupidest user in the world.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Agent Dink
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 00:47
Link
145ms

Warning: Please be advised. Geek Culture is under lockdown. All mods are set to Indi mode. Any and all topics WILL BE LOCKED. Post at your own risk!
Back to top
Profile PM
Aaron Miller
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Playing: osu!
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 04:24
Link
0ms on aluseus GOD's test.
125ms on Raven's test.

Running Windows Vista Home Premium, AMD 3800+ 2.4GHz, 940MB RAM, ATI 1950 GPU <I believe>


The fact that this is done in DBP may make you're computer seem slower than it actually is...

Cheers,

-naota

"I'd newbie slap here, but I've no idea how far I'd need slap before they'd come back with a clue." - VanB
Aex.Uni forums
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Keo C
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere between here and there.
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 04:37
Link
172 ms for Raven's
Sys specs are above.


Back to top
Profile PM Website
andrey d
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2007
Location:
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 07:40 Edited at: 6th Nov 2007 07:41
Link
Let's get some floating points in here along with integers? Do a bunch of calculations because these tests right now will make you score higher with faster cpu clock and lower cache latency, and it's not a very good indicator of real-world performance.
Back to top
Profile PM Website
aluseus GOD
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2007
Location: I\'m here. Now I\'m there. I keep moving
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 14:28
Link
forget it windowskiller. I dont wwant that argument invading here.

alus.portbb.com go there.
[quote]A book. I hate books. book is stupid. I know that I need codes but I dont know the codes.[/quote} -zenicanin14 the stupidest user in the world.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Venge
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Sep 2006
Location: Iowa
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 14:36
Link
Quote: " it's up to you to decide whether you want to learn or not"


Well, look at his sig..
Back to top
Profile PM
Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 6th Nov 2007 15:01
Link
Quote: "125ms on Raven's test.

Running Windows Vista Home Premium, AMD 3800+ 2.4GHz, 940MB RAM, ATI 1950 GPU <I believe>"


See here is why this test is complete pointless.
As the system I coded that on achieves 235-250ms
Vista Ultimate, Athlon64 X2 3200+ (2.0GHz), 768MB RAM, GeForce 6100

Yet with the exact same test, I was able to get 65ms on
Vista Ultimate, Core 2 Duo (1.6GHz), 2GB RAM, Radeon HD 2900 XT

I mean you could argue, that "well you have more ram and the core 2 duo is a better chip".. which yeah quite undeniable however if I swap over the HD-2900 to my internet system it drops from 250ms to a staggering 96ms

just changing the graphics card, despite this test that should be entirely processor based; lack of sync and taking up so little ram it should be inconsiquencial.

if you want to really test someones performance, use C++/Pascal/ASM as DBP just can't do it.

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-19 11:24:42
Your offset time is: 2024-11-19 11:24:42