Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / iCab for OSX - Anyone used it?

Author
Message
Nicholas Thompson
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Sep 2004
Location: Bognor Regis, UK
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 10:51
Link
Has anyone used iCab for OSX yet?

http://www.icab.de/

According to Wikipedia its meant to be quite good.

Impressively, it has Acid2 compliance.

[center]
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Data
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Nov 2004
Location: Winnipeg,Canada
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 18:40
Link
I've tried it but personally, Im just going to stick to Safari

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Insert Name Here
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Mar 2007
Location: Worcester, England
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 19:01
Link
Quote: "According to Wikipedia its meant to be quite good.
"

There's something so fiendishly ironic about that sentance.


Back to top
Profile PM
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 19:10
Link
Indeed, I remember Wikipedia telling me that Elton John is gay...

True story...looked for one thing and it flashed at me with the message.

I suppose new browsers are handy, but far as I am concerned Safari does its job efficiently, but I'd guess you'd really need to try it out for yourself and see if it's worth it.

It takes blood and guts to be this cool, but I'm still just a cliche
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Keo C
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere between here and there.
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 19:54
Link
Quote: "Indeed, I remember Wikipedia telling me that Elton John is gay.."

Elton John is gay.


Image made by the overworked Biggadd.
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 20:48
Link
Well yes, I was tempted to agree with it for messing around purposes (considering Dave Grohl, Paris Hilton and Elton John are my main victims for satire), but I thought I'd be serious for once. The point was that anybody can say anything on Wikipedia, thus whatever it say is unreliable and for 'intellectual' purposes the only thing it's good for is the resource listed at the bottom giving you more reliable sources.

It takes blood and guts to be this cool, but I'm still just a cliche
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Insert Name Here
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Mar 2007
Location: Worcester, England
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 21:25
Link
The point I'm trying to make here is Wikipedia is supposed to be purely impartial.


Back to top
Profile PM
Keo C
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere between here and there.
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 21:52
Link
That too.


Image made by the overworked Biggadd.
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Nicholas Thompson
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Sep 2004
Location: Bognor Regis, UK
Posted: 22nd Jan 2008 23:09
Link
I should have worded my sentence better - by...
Quote: "According to Wikipedia its meant to be quite good."


I meant that it ticks a lot of the feature boxes.

I might give it a go - mainly to cross-browser test my sites.

[center]
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-19 19:25:06
Your offset time is: 2024-11-19 19:25:06