Quote: "CSS is cool, but CSS has problems. Like, cross-compatibility, for example"
Generally speaking, when done properly, you VEY rarely see incompatibility issues. Also, you can usually quite easily either work around those issues or learn to become aware of what breaks what in certain browsers.
Also your 25-60% of visitors statistic is HUGELY misleading. Getting a site to work in IE, Firefox and Safari is pretty easy and that easily covers 90% of your visitors. Generally speaking, once a site is working in "the big three" it will usually work in all the others such as Flock (which is Firefox really) and Opera, etc.
Manic - Dreamweaver does suck - it really does. However I do agree that it sucks MORE if you dont know what you're doing - but that applies for all editors I suppose. The problem I have with Dreamweaver is how it has a BAD habit of creating spaghetti code and producing really poor CSS styles.
As for the site - I personally do not like the fact it resizes for the window size. Scaling images up make them look blurry. Also not a big fan of the sheering menu images on mouse over. Also not keen on the fact that the header, menu and footer take up about 75% of the vertical space and the content only 25%.
Your site also fails validation on 70 counts...
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.threeswordsproductions.com%2Findex.html
PS: I cant seem to make that into a link on this forum! I believe its related to the URL Encoding...
[center]