Probably not the best idea to actually post your political opinion here, that's what'll stir up political discussion as people have mixed views and may think yours is a foolish one (not me, I wouldn't care, it's US politics and I've not exactly followed it)
Contraversial art don't matter, after all art is supposed to be an expression of the artist, right?
Good photoshopping mate.
You seem to emphasise the 'Saw' aspect of the image, but the first thing I noticed was how it could be interpreted as 'putting on a face for the public' and I'd run a risk expanding that, but as I we're talking about the interpretation of art and not strictly political I'll post it, just in a code box:
So this is a political interpretation of the art folks (and not necessarily a political stance I agree with), don't click if you think you'll react with a political argument:
It doesn't matter what face you put on, black, white, male, female, democrat, republican, all presidents are the same underneath the skin.
You sir have the moral ambivalence of a mutated shrimp!
