Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Building a new PC Q&A

Author
Message
Guyon
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 20:47
Building a new PC and looking for input.

I am worried about Vista (software compatibility with my $$$ programs) and was thinking about sticking with XP. Will XP pro power a quad core machine? What is the difference between XP pro's like (System Builders
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 21:00
Vista's good. Do a thread search for Vista for info. Seriously, this has been discussed a hundred times on these boards :S


It's not just for BYOND you know!
UnderLord
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Aug 2003
Location:
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 21:22
No windows XP pro will not support a quad core, infact it doesn't even support dual cores, but yet it will still show all cores in the task manager regardless and you can still set affinity's however it will not optimize the power of dual or quad cores. If you go with a AMD system with DDR2 1066 make sure you get a quad core or the system will automatically run the ram at DDR2 800.

"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road."
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 22:21
Are you sure it doesn't support multicore? I'm pretty sure it does, even if it isn't perfectly implemented. I'm fairly certain that many games split loading and the game itself between cores. Am I mistaken? Are all multicore XP systems a waste of space?

David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 22:26
Quote: "you can still set affinity's however it will not optimize the power of dual or quad cores."


Care to elaborate?


09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
Mahoney
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Apr 2008
Location: The Interwebs
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 22:30
Quote: "Care to elaborate?"


While programs designed for multi-core CPU's will make use of the multi-core, Windows XP itself is not multi-core optimized; Vista is.

Windows Vista Home Premium Intel Pentium Dual-Core 1.6 Ghz 1GB DDR2 RAM GeForce 8600GT Twin Turbo
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 22:42
Ah, I see. So it'll make no difference on the most part then, just maybe slightly longer loading and lowered responsiveness around Windows. Which I must say, neither of which are a problem for me.

Guyon
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 23:22
Quote: "While programs designed for multi-core CPU's will make use of the multi-core, Windows XP itself is not multi-core optimized; Vista is."


So even if Vista is multi-core optimized. How does that effect program that are not multi-core optimized running in Vista as opposed to Windows XP?

Thanks guy this is really help me make big decisions and I do have a number of not new but expensive pieces of software. especially 3d stuff.
chunks chunks
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Jan 2007
Location: ackworth uk
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 23:23 Edited at: 21st Sep 2008 23:28
To be honest i use xp for all my music software on a dual core and it`s much more effcient than vista is at audio recording and such , which is very cpu intensive .

There is a patch which you can get from microsoft and some settings to change in boot.ini which makes xp support dual cores better, there is a couple of tut`s on the web here and there i will dig them out for ya`ll .

Don`t know about quad cores though , just my thoughts .



edit :

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=545980

nvidia geforce 8600gt + amd athlon 64
windows xp pro.
Mahoney
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Apr 2008
Location: The Interwebs
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 23:25
Quote: "So even if Vista is multi-core optimized. How does that effect program that are not multi-core optimized running in Vista as opposed to Windows XP?"


I'm not 100% sure, to be honest. I will say this: Vista is much better and managing system resources than XP, whether that be CPU usage or RAM usage or even HDD usage! (There is an entirely new HDD usage system that is much more efficient than XP's.)

Windows Vista Home Premium Intel Pentium Dual-Core 1.6 Ghz 1GB DDR2 RAM GeForce 8600GT Twin Turbo
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 21st Sep 2008 23:26
What software do you have? Honestly, I haven't had much of anything fail on me in vista.


It's not just for BYOND you know!
Guyon
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posted: 22nd Sep 2008 03:21
I know Vista fails with Game Maker (I am really upset abut that), I have not found any definite answer that my 3ds max 7 will worth either. And it looks like my SwishMax 2003 may not work as well.

My biggest problem is that most of the people that say vista works fine with do not run as many obscure program.

Anyone running XP with a quad core? Will I really hurt myself by sticking with XP pro? If not which XP pro should I buy?
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 22nd Sep 2008 03:46
which vista should you buy you mean? Go with home premium or ultimate.

As for obscure programs, I run all sorts of freeware games and haven't come up with problems.

http://area.autodesk.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/15741/#79466

Check out this thread, appears there's a fix towards the bottom of the thread.


It's not just for BYOND you know!

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-20 16:39:21
Your offset time is: 2024-11-20 16:39:21