Quote: "Don't get the wrong impression. I'm not angry or even arguing with you"
Good, okay then.
Quote: "You just can't stop, can you? Don't get the wrong impression. I'm not angry or even arguing with you, I actually find it amusing that with every other sentence you put others down for not thinking like you do. Maybe you just never realized it."
What are you saying? If a person has no interest in bettering themselves (that includes seeking new experiences, not just academic) then they might as well be dead, what is your argument against that? It is human nature to be curious, and science is our best tool for explaining the universe, so people should support it.
Quote: "You talk as if the only science worth doing involves going vertically up into space. There are fields all over we should be focusing on first."
So we should research one thing at a time?
Quote: "Fusion power, improved drive mechanisms, better nutrition, shielding technologies. There is so much we should do to improve the tech to get to Mars, before we just blast off with just-gets-by tech. "
I thought we were talking generally about science funding, not this specific expedition to Mars.
Of course it's "just-gets-by tech", IT'S SCIENCE! If it was refined technology then it wouldn't be science any more, it would be engineering, and the only way to get to that position is through experimentation. That's like saying the Wright Brothers shouldn't have tried building an aeroplane until they knew which design would work.
The gluteus-maximus mammary-gland formally known as OBese87.