Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Maths Challenges

Author
Message
Chris K
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2003
Location: Lake Hylia
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 01:13
Link
I wonder if anyone can prove any of these:

1. Fairly easy one to start off with (this is from a GCSE paper) - Prove that, for any integer k, k(k+1)(2k+1) is a multiple of 6

2. Prove that the area of a circle is a quarter of the surface area of a sphere with the same radius. - pretty tricky

3. Prove that the difference between the square of two primes bigger than 3 is a multiple of 24 -

If you can do any then post others or other people.
Post your proofs in a code box so you don't give them away.
Back to top
Profile PM
HZence
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Mar 2003
Location:
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 01:35 Edited at: 17th Jun 2004 01:36
Link
For the first one...




Team EOD :: Programmer/Storyboard Assistant
Back to top
Profile PM
MikeS
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Dec 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 02:02 Edited at: 17th Jun 2004 02:04
Link
Anwser to #2
(May be hard to read because I don't know the fancy symbols.)



Hehe, we just got done using these in math around May. Hope I remembered right.

[EDIT] The anwsers are of course in Square units.

A book? I hate book. Book is stupid.
(Formerly known as Yellow)
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Chris K
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2003
Location: Lake Hylia
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 02:08
Link
@ HZence

That's not quite enough. You can't know for sure that all other numbers will work.

I'll give some clues

Back to top
Profile PM
andrew11
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Feb 2003
Location: United States
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 02:15 Edited at: 17th Jun 2004 02:33
Link
[ed!t]


"All programmers are playwrites and all computers are lousy actors" -Anon
Back to top
Profile PM
HZence
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Mar 2003
Location:
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 02:17
Link
Andrew11, you posted basically what I posted. Knotty seems to think it isn't enough


Team EOD :: Programmer/Storyboard Assistant
Back to top
Profile PM
andrew11
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Feb 2003
Location: United States
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 02:21 Edited at: 17th Jun 2004 02:32
Link
[edit]


"All programmers are playwrites and all computers are lousy actors" -Anon
Back to top
Profile PM
kevil
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 02:44
Link
Hmm, I'll try those, I'm used to proving stuff. Let's first do number one.



Now onto the next one

Kevil
Back to top
Profile PM Email
kevil
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 02:47
Link
Number 2 confuses me a bit.

I have been taught that the area of a circle is pi*r^2, and that the area of the surface of a sphere is 4*pi*r^2, so then it automatically follows.

Kevil
Back to top
Profile PM Email
kevil
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 03:33
Link
For number 3:



Kevil
Back to top
Profile PM Email
kevil
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 03:48
Link
Here's an easier one. I actually got this question at an exam:

4. Proof that 23^(1/5) is irrational.

Kevil
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Phaelax
DBPro Master
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Apr 2003
Location: Metropia
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 04:40
Link
I hate proofs! proofs are stupid!

"eureka" - Archimedes
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
TheAbomb12
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Aug 2003
Location: Amist the blue skies...
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 08:22
Link
Book. I hate book. Book is stupid

Amist the Blue Skies...
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Chris K
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2003
Location: Lake Hylia
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 11:05
Link
Whoa. Well done kevil.

Yeah, for the second one, try and prove that the area is four times. Like they would have when they made the formula for SA of a sphere for the first time.

I'll have a go at you're one this evening, I've got a physics exam.
Back to top
Profile PM
spooky
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 12:27
Link
I did number 2 in A level maths. Trouble is that it was 17 years ago! Had to do come up with all the equations for surface areas and volumes of spheres and areas of circles and the like, from scratch. I think it uses integrals and slicing up the object but my mind's a blank.


Boo!
Back to top
Profile PM Website
kevil
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 13:38
Link
We'll, I think there are many ways to calculate the surface area of a sphere. The method that is most recent to me is using surface integrals. Here's how:



Is that enough proof?

Kevil
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Chris K
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2003
Location: Lake Hylia
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 16:17
Link
Hmm... I guess it is.
Try it without intergrating. I'm 90% it's possible.
Think of a sphere inside a cylinder that is the same radius.

I think they knew a formula for SA of a sphere before integration was invented.

You can get A = Pi r^2 by integrating with triangles (like you are cutting a cake into slices). The triangles fit together to make a box with height r and length Pi * r (2 pi r /2). The height is r because as the base of isosceles tends to zero, the sides become the same as the height.
Back to top
Profile PM
kevil
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 17th Jun 2004 17:16
Link
Hmm, might try that later.
I always find it hard to prove something without using certain things you already know. It's annoying.

Anyway, here are a few more challenges for you:

5. Prove that the alternating series sum((-1)^(n-1) / n, for n 1..infinite) converges to ln(2).

So show that:
1/1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 + ......... = ln(2)

6. Derive a direct formula for the fibonacci series. The fibonacci series is described by:

Un = Un-1 + Un-2, U0 = 0, U1=1

So find Un as a function of only n.

Kevil
Back to top
Profile PM Email
kevil
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 18th Jun 2004 01:02
Link
For the sphere in the cilinder:

Do you mean you want to show that the surface of the sphere is the same as the surface of the round side of the cilinder with the same radius (which is 2*pi*r * 2*r = 4*pi*r^2)?

I have no idea how to do that though.

And nobody wants to try my challenges? Weaklings

Kevil
Back to top
Profile PM Email
MikeS
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Dec 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 18th Jun 2004 04:22
Link
Chris, when will the anwsers be posted?



A book? I hate book. Book is stupid.
(Formerly known as Yellow)
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Neofish
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Apr 2004
Location: A swimming pool of coke
Posted: 19th Jun 2004 00:02
Link
2. Prove that the area of a circle is a quarter of the surface area of a sphere with the same radius. - pretty tricky



Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-09-22 02:36:03
Your offset time is: 2024-09-22 02:36:03