Quote: "Did any of you get upset with Windows ME, how dere Microsoft sell a program to the public full of bugs."
Can't say that I did. Infact I found/find Windows ME to be fast, reliable and stable...
If it could run Maya, I would still be using it as my primay OS today.
I still don't understand why everyone mouths off about ME, because in my experience it has run perfectly on the machines I installed it onto. I never had any problems, my folks never had any problems, my friends never had any problems.
I can't say the same for the rest of the Windows 32bit Series.
95 was unstable, until release C.
98 Crashed on me 12x during installation so I took it back.
NT 3.51 Killed my FAT32 Partitions with some glee often, and was uninstallable (I still can't get it off an old Maxtor 1GB)
NT 4, lived upto it's name; and crashed on me around 4x a day.
NT 2000 was more grand in how it performed, as it randomly rebooted due to hardware conflicts. (something that plagued XP-Home even more)
XP-Professional is currently incompatible with my Audio Hardware's Surround Sound, and has a strange problem with my Geforce since reinstalling ... which is even more odd when the Microsoft drivers seem to work (but very very slowely) yet the NVIDIA ones don't.
For a long while I thought XP-Pro might actually put itself as stable, but recent driver releases start up old conflict problems. Most of these stem very closely to those systems I have which have Via Mobos.
People also tell me that SiS Mobo's are poor, but again I've not had as many problems with them as with my Via ones.
Tell ya the most stable combination i've had to date:
Pentium2-300MHz Mmx (AL440Lx) / 512MB 133MHz CLK2 Ram / Maxtor Diamond 40GB HDD / Geforce 4 Ti 4800 / Philips CDRW1600+ / Windows ME
most stable system I've ever had. never crashed even once one me.