That wasn't the summary, that was the ' What else is there' box. The summary was:
'Don't get me wrong, even though the end product is useless, creating your own game is fantastic fun - just don't expect to become the next Carmack. If you want to do that, start learning binary now.'
Which IMHO actually is a very fair comment!
Also take the score into context with some other reviews that issue:
Star Wars Battlefront 2 - only got 8% more (61%)
The Matrix: Path of Neo - got 34% less (19%!)
Title Bout Boxing - 17%
Starship Troopers - 58%
X-Factor - 45%
On that basis when you're comparing the likes of SW Battlefront 2, with its multi-millon dollar development budget, and massive of team of pros, not to mention amazing IP, it only manages 8% more. I thought the review was quite fair, especially from a mag like that! They have balls-solid standards as can be seen from the ratings above.
Anyway, I was more excited about their review of Mono than FPSC
Nice one guys!
Cheers,
Rich
Exit Planet Dust