Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / the possible return of co-processors

Author
Message
Kenjar
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jun 2005
Location: TGC
Posted: 26th Jul 2006 11:29
I don't know who here is old enough to remember the good old days of the 286/ 386/ 486 CPU's and their SX/DX Variations, so I'll quickly explain. In those days there was a main general purpose processor, and a specialised mathematical processor designed to boost large maths calculations. Great for games. Since the 586 the SX/DX terms were no longer used as the mathematical co-processor was intergrated into all CPU's.

Today, with multicore technology on it's way up, (intel are working on a quad core atm) CPU manufacturers are looking towards more clever CPU Design. The idea at the moment is that the CPU's HyperTransport bus, to allow first or thrid party co-processors direct access to the same transport ring (called AMD's Torrenza initiative) as the CPU and RAM. So, potentially, rather than buying a physiX card, you could buy a chip instead. With AMD's proposed buyout of ATI, it's also entirely possible we could see 3D graphics processing going the same way. No longer would you have to worry about PCI/AGP/PCI-E interfaces, it would become a matter of picking the right co-processor and shoving it in.

This of cause would make minituraization much easier. Laptops would of cause benefit greatly as standard hardware could be inserted into motherboards, rather than specialised miniature versions of exising hardware. The standard PC could become smaller than a playstation or X-BOX, in theory. Devices such as TV cards, and sound cards could be firmly moved to the realm of USB, or built directly into the motherboard.

Pricey
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Feb 2003
Location:
Posted: 26th Jul 2006 17:10
i remember my CPU and MPU used to be on separate chips. my CPU was like 16mhz and i had like 2mb of ram. and i never complained. lmao.

:: 3Ghz Pentium 4 / Hyper Threading, 1024mb RAM, 250GB HDD, 256mb Radeon 9600XT Graphics ::


Kenjar
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jun 2005
Location: TGC
Posted: 26th Jul 2006 19:57
I think it's a rather good idea myself. The APG/ PCI/ PCI-E bus does tend to provide bottle necking points and interrupt slow downs.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-17 09:41:58
Your offset time is: 2024-11-17 09:41:58