Quote: "Number 2, I wasnt laughing at ANYONE. That is your assumption ( and we all know what happens when you ASSume something). I was laughing at the fact of the many issues this game engine has with trying to do what it was specifically NOT designed to do in the first place, and the many irratic and unpredictable behaviors that happen with the afore-mentioned. So dont assume andything, if I laugh at someone, I will point them out, trust me."
When there is great doubt, don't say anything at all. If you say
"ha ha ha,,that was good,,,omg,,,I ,,I,,,I cant handle it...lol...funny....hurts..when..I ...laugh."
Laughing at the engine, yeah. Think of it like this, if you walked into a room where your countries leader is talking and randomly laughed what do you think would happen? Given the situation, he probally would think you are laughing AT him (unless he told a joke).
P.S. the [mod edit] joke is a last desperate resort, it is annoying and does little for ones reputation. When someone assumes something they derive a conclusion using limited information and logical processes, not generate a random idea that has no corelation to the situation. That is called being an idiot or stereotyping, in some situations.
Quote: "Once again, another yet unfounded assumption about me. This is just another example of ones thinking that because they have been a member longer, they are better equipped or better than someone who has only been a member for a short time."
Proven fact. A person who has little experience in a field will perform worse then one who has experience. In other words, your experience does not qualify you to assume what you do not know. This idea has been done, I distinctly remember the concept being discussed, or at least one view.
The idea IS to use waypoints, as clearly said by uman. The issue is with discrepancies in the new physics engine and collision engine ALSO said by uman. You want a script? Follow.fpi should work, getting the model to work with it is the problem. Also said in this thread is a follow no rotate idea. I would assume that the player stands on some platform and as he moves forward the platform moves with, but I can not say for certain, I am not aware of the script suggested.
I don’t mean to impose insult, but assuming that you know the answer is not the way to go, just say your view as a simply as possible, and avoid confrontation by explaining action. Starting your post off with a hysterical outburst can be taken as a sign of disrespect, others might just take it as “noob behavior” (the definition of noob is not the same as newbie), but it does ask for explanation. Given no explanation one tries to make logical conclusions. So, if you do have a fit of hysteria explain it instead of proceeding to converse.
Your Mod was deleted by the Government.
