Quote: "TGC dont seem to show everything packs contain visually and it does result in lost sales no doubt. "
It's even worse.... some of the images of the packs they show aren't even done in FPSC. Model Pack 3 for example sure looks very slick in the promo images, but it's not half as good in FPSC. The promo's have been rendered in something like 3D Studio Max and are very misleading.
I've found that most of the promo images TGC uses are very misleading.
Quote: "I have avoided buying most TGC media packs for many years for that reason. But thats just me."
I haven't, I've got a number of them and they're good, I'm very satisfied with Model Pack 1 & 4 and also with the Sprite Pack, good quality. I didn't get Model Pack 2, I do find the segments rather ugly and most of the items I have no use for. I do like the scientist, but to pay $20 for him alone. I do also have Model Pack 3, (won it in the youtube contest) but if I would have purchased it, I would have felt cheated due to the quality of the promo not matching the quality in FPSC.
As for making a brochure, it should be done by the author of the pack. I'm glad Bond1 put it in the link. It gives an excellent representation of what the models look like, it should be added to the info of the pack. As for model pack 3, I can imagine why they haven't put up a brochure.
Still model pack 3 is good, but it seems to rushed somehow, perhaps the release should have been postponed so some of the textures could have been redone and of a better quality.
