Quote: "Not yet perhaps - just wait till they ban violent PC games ..."
Very true. Viva la resistance!
Quote: "Matt Rock, I think it has everything to do with the source of authority. It would be okay, for example...for Michael Moore to march into K-Mart headquarters, and try to make them culpable, and to cheapen someone else's misery by asking for a refund on a bullet that, sadly...worked as advertised. It is even too much of a stretch to call them out because they sell ammunition."
I don't get what you're getting at here, Michael Moore made a pretty valid point in Bowling for Columbine, except for the fact that he didn't mention that if this had happened in an inner-city setting no one would have discussed it. Anyway, I agree that BAD PARENTING is to blame. I deemed it necessary to put that all in caps lol, every time I say it, someone gets up-in-arms about it
But parents don't want to take the blame for the stupid actions of their kids, and they don't want to be "oppressive" and not allow them access to games they shouldn't be playing. You should be able to tell if your kid is a flippin' psycho or not, and your kid has to have the IQ of a Q-Tip to go around killing people because he/ she saw it in a video game, imo anyway
At the end of the day, the guilty always look for someone to blame, and they don't want the blame to fall into their own laps, even though THEY are truly responsible. I agree with gun control, sure, but it won't make people stop being violent. At the same time anyone who thinks they need an AK47 to kill a deer should be locked away for life in an asylum, end of story. But making every game non-violent will only make other people (like me) more violent
"In an interstellar burst, I'm back to save the universe"