Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / What's the latest version of .NET?

Author
Message
Richard Davey
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2002
Location: On the Jupiter Probe
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 15:45
Hi guys,

Does anyone know what the latest version of .NET is that has been pushed out via Windows Update / a Service Pack? (if any that is!)

Cheers,

Rich

"Bite my shiny metal ass" (Futurama)
"Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth" (Dilbert)
OSX Using Happy Dude
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Aug 2003
Location: At home
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 16:31
Is should be .NET 2.0 with two updates.

Visit my web site for real bangin' stuff. Word.
David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 17:41
v2.0.50727 exactly

OSX Using Happy Dude
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Aug 2003
Location: At home
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 17:59
Forgot the .42 at the end of that

Visit my web site for real bangin' stuff. Word.
Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 18:23
Windows XP (Service Pack Any) - v1.0.3705.0
Windows Update v5 - v1.1.4332.0
Windows Update v6 - v2.0.5072.7
Windows Vista (RC1/RC2) - v3.0.4506.3
DirectX9 - v9.12.589.0 (retail) / v9.15.768.0 (developer)
DirectX10 - v10.05.288 (retail) / v10.08.515.0 (developer)
DirectX for Managed Code - v1.0.2911.0
Managed DirectX - v9.00.1126



Intel Pentium-D 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR2 433, Ati Radeon X1600 Pro 256MB PCI-E, Windows Vista RC1 / XP Professional SP2
PowerSoft
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 23:22
Off topic slightly but .NET 3.0 will have SOME 3d capabilities.

Richard Davey
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2002
Location: On the Jupiter Probe
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 23:29
Yeah I read an article in VSJ today about the 3D aspects of .NET 3, basically just inherited from XAML. It did look quite interesting, but bugger me it took a LOAD of complex code just to get a cube on-screen, never mind do anything with it.

"Bite my shiny metal ass" (Futurama)
"Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth" (Dilbert)
PowerSoft
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 27th Oct 2006 23:38
Yea I get VSJ also, its quite a good little read.

Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 28th Oct 2006 01:15
.NET 3.0 is technically more like .NET 2.x
What it does is build and expand on the .NET 2.0 CLR

CLR 2.0 - Base Class 2.0 - ASP .NET 2.0
-------------------------- Forms .NET 2.0
-------------------------- Communication (3.0)
-------------------------- Presentation (3.0)
-------------------------- Workflow (3.0)
-------------------------- Cardspace (3.0)

Each of the new 3.0 add-ons (which are just renamed and structured WinFX systems) provide key support for application development in the modern workplace environment.

Better support for developing better UI Systems (Office 2007 is a good example of this) as well as better application communication and user information. It can all be accessed and used very quickly and easily providing your applications with the ability to integrate and flow with a modern workplace environment.



and yes 3D is available through XAML, however this is already supported by the .NET 2.0 Framework. WPF simply provides you with the ability to integrate it seemlessly.

This said personally I'd recommend using Managed DirectX for 3D work, as it work seemlessly over both XP and Vista.

Intel Pentium-D 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR2 433, Ati Radeon X1600 Pro 256MB PCI-E, Windows Vista RC1 / XP Professional SP2
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 28th Oct 2006 16:51 Edited at: 28th Oct 2006 16:52
.NET 1.1 and 2.0 already has 3D capabilities... DX SDK 9 as pure .NET classes, no COM Interop necessary

Kentaree
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2002
Location: Clonmel, Ireland
Posted: 28th Oct 2006 17:34
CR, I think they mean as the core system, you need to install the DirectX SDK to get access to the managed DirectX libs

CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 29th Oct 2006 01:44
oh ho.

Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 29th Oct 2006 04:38
hense my last sentence
it's still surprising how many people get mixed up over Managed DirectX and DirectX for Managed Code even.

So your faux pas is understandable. I've wondered by why doesn't Microsoft have DirectX updates also on Windows Update?
I mean it's only if you don't have the release, over update does it install the current.

It means so many people are often behind by quite a bit. XInput is one of the worst affected by this.

Intel Pentium-D 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR2 433, Ati Radeon X1600 Pro 256MB PCI-E, Windows Vista RC1 / XP Professional SP2

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-17 19:38:18
Your offset time is: 2024-11-17 19:38:18