Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Finally getting Windows Vista!

Author
Message
gamebird
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Jun 2007
Location:
Posted: 23rd Aug 2007 17:15
Quote: "I might be able to explain this - (If it's faster than XP on required computers, I might install the demon this one) People say Vista is a ram hog because when the look at the ram stats Vista uses like half of it, when they have 1gb ram. well when I had 256mb ram, XP used half and when I upgrade to 512mb, it used half again. When I posted on the Microsoft forums about XP performance issues someone explained to me that the OS gathers as many resources as it can whilst running for the most performance on the OS - though I've found it doesn't hog the ram as I've found when playing a game the ram seems to orientate itself...

How much truth I put there I don't know...but I think that may explain why."


This is because of caching. OSes automatically cache files and folders that it thinks you will open so you can quickly view those files, folders, etc. But they only use the ram that isn't currently needed. OSes act on the correct philosophy that if the ram isn't used, its wasted. Windows caches over time, so the longer you keep it running, the more unused ram it will fill. But if you play a game, it will delete stuff from the cache when more space is needed.
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 23rd Aug 2007 18:58
Quote: "I dont work for Microsoft to work out bugs for free after I paid to do so"


I don't understand people's problems with patches. Some smart hacker finds an exploit in the software, so it's in our best interest that MS sends out a patch.

And by the way, Apple regularly sends out patches too, so don't pretend they make perfect, bulletproof OS'

Aaron Miller
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Playing: osu!
Posted: 23rd Aug 2007 23:25
@Keo C
Wow, really? Did you even try it? I mean, SP 1 is on the way, the bugs are barely even noticeable.... It's a perfectly fine OS in my oppinion.


Cheers,

-naota

Quote: "I quoted myself."

NG Website Aex.Uni forums
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 24th Aug 2007 00:40
Quote: "Windows caches over time,"

I read that as Windows crashes all of the time. I think I need my eyes checked.

Quote: "I mean, SP 1 is on the way, the bugs are barely even noticeable.... It's a perfectly fine OS in my oppinion."


This is good to hear.

Hakuna Matata
spooky
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 24th Aug 2007 01:22
There is a leaked pre-release version of SP1 floating about and reviewers have said that it fixes all the speed and disk-bashing problems in Vista, and fixes a problem where apparantly simply copying files could take ages. Sounds good to me.

Boo!
Aaron Miller
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Playing: osu!
Posted: 24th Aug 2007 03:03
Now that you mention it, spooky, it does take a little while to copy some files, but that was off of my USB to a secondary hard drive, maybe it was Vista or just the speed of the two, but I hadn't noticed that elsewhere.

Anyways, I too heard of the leaked pre-release. I would get that, but I don't want to screw up my computer, lol.


Cheers,

-naota

Quote: "I quoted myself."

NG Website Aex.Uni forums
spooky
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 24th Aug 2007 12:05
I worded it wrongly. I certainly would not install that version of SP1 as it will probably break something else. I was just saying that it will be great when SP1 comes out and brings Vista up to a level so that it is usable without any weird lags.

I have never even seen Vista in action so when I get it in a week or two it will be interesting to see if it is as bad, or good, as what people say.

Boo!
Mr Makealotofsmoke
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Dec 2006
Location: BillTown (Well Aust)
Posted: 24th Aug 2007 15:04 Edited at: 24th Aug 2007 15:05
Quote: "and fixes a problem where apparantly simply copying files could take ages"

i had this problem with my friends pc the other day. I wanted to copy 1.5 gig of files onto my USB stick. Was gonna take 3hours 30min

i wanted to put vista on my mums laptop when i get it. But its so bad i cant. (40gig HDD, 190mb RAM, radeon 320M, AMD AthlonXP-M 1.7GHz)

Satchmo
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th May 2005
Location:
Posted: 24th Aug 2007 15:09
Just add more ram, as long as that crappy GPU can do dx9 you will be fine.

Your about to get pwned.
Mr Makealotofsmoke
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Dec 2006
Location: BillTown (Well Aust)
Posted: 24th Aug 2007 15:55
only thing is that idk were to get ram from
i dont even know if it will be worth it
idk if ill get the laptop

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-19 05:20:46
Your offset time is: 2024-11-19 05:20:46