Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Left 4 Dead on Nvidia GeForce 9300?

Author
Message
Cyborg ART
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jan 2007
Location: Sweden - Sthlm
Posted: 27th Dec 2008 21:25
My friend just bought a new computer, and now he wonder if he will need to buy a new graphic card, or can he play Left 4 Dead with a decent quallity on a Nvidia GeForce 9300?

I guess this aint the rigth place for asking this, but I hope there is someone out there who knows

Thanks!

CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 27th Dec 2008 21:29
Well I played the demo pretty well on a Radeon X1550, so I'd imagine that it'll be alright, as long as the rest of his PC's up to scratch...

Cyborg ART
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jan 2007
Location: Sweden - Sthlm
Posted: 27th Dec 2008 21:31
I dont know much of the Radeon serie
But its a tiny little monster The only thing wich isnt so good is the graphic card.

JoelJ
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Sep 2003
Location: UTAH
Posted: 27th Dec 2008 21:49
Quote: "Nvidia GeForce 9300?"

I don't know, maybe I'm just WAY out of the Video Card loop, but a 9300 sounds pretty dang good to me.

is there a demo? He could try that... see if it works. I would be willing to bet his computer would work just fine with it at least on low quality.


[email protected] RAM-NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M-Windows Vista Business 32bit
CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 27th Dec 2008 22:05
It got taken down after release. Apparently the replayability was so good, that people were in danger of not buying the full version, 'cos they were having so much fun with the demo lol...

Insert Name Here
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Mar 2007
Location: Worcester, England
Posted: 28th Dec 2008 00:21
Quote: "I don't know, maybe I'm just WAY out of the Video Card loop, but a 9300 sounds pretty dang good to me."

The first number is the generation and the following three are the power. So a 9300 is a generation 9, three hundered power, which isn't as powerful as a 8800 - 8 generation, 800 power.

Lee Bamber - Blame Beer
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 28th Dec 2008 00:23 Edited at: 28th Dec 2008 00:24
The 9300 is a motherboard integrated mobile graphics card. I'd be surprised if it can play any current gen title adequately. It likely doesn't even meet the minimum requirements for the game.

"I acctually quite like this site. And noone will know because this is a secret..." - Anonymous
Shhdb.com
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 28th Dec 2008 00:57 Edited at: 28th Dec 2008 01:11
Does it have the right amount of MBs? I have a 9500M GS, and left 4 dead runs brilliantly - though it lags when there are masses, upon masses of zombies. It's very well optimised I think, and fairly solid (the game that is)

I don't know how much lower down the line the 9300 is, I imagine it's probably not that brilliant for games. (Maybe it'll work on lower settings)

--The hatred of those who harbour such ill feelings as, "He reviled me, assaulted me, vanquished me and robbed me," is never appeased.--
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 28th Dec 2008 01:01
The difference is the 9500m isn't an integrated card

"I acctually quite like this site. And noone will know because this is a secret..." - Anonymous
Shhdb.com
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 28th Dec 2008 01:12 Edited at: 28th Dec 2008 01:15
True, perhaps turn down the settings? What's the best game he can run? Maybe we can see how powerful it is by comparing it to games that have worked.

[Edit]

Crysis seems to be a good benchmark for the graphics performance on newer cards, there is a Crysis Demo available, so it might be worth a shot. Pressumable, if it can handle Crysis, even on lowest settings, then I'd assume it'd have little trouble with Left4Dead. (I run left 4 dead on high and Crysis Medium)

--The hatred of those who harbour such ill feelings as, "He reviled me, assaulted me, vanquished me and robbed me," is never appeased.--
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 28th Dec 2008 01:32
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-nforce-730i,2044-8.html

"I acctually quite like this site. And noone will know because this is a secret..." - Anonymous
Shhdb.com
Uncle Sam
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Jul 2005
Location: West Coast, USA
Posted: 28th Dec 2008 08:58
I just sold my geforce 7950gt and have ordered a high-end geforce 9800 gtx + for about the same price as I sold it. This just proves that the last three numbers REALLY mean the power of the card.

Cyborg ART
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jan 2007
Location: Sweden - Sthlm
Posted: 29th Dec 2008 17:35
Hmm... Maybe its best for him to buy a new graphic card.

Quote: "I have a 9500M GS, and left 4 dead runs brilliantly - though it lags when there are masses, upon masses of zombies."


It even lags on my monster machine
8800 Gt 1024mb with 3Gb Ram

Aaagreen
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2007
Location: City 17
Posted: 29th Dec 2008 21:11
I have GeForce 9800gt, and HL2 Episode 2 can run on full graphical quality settings (everything, including filtering, set to max), with the dynamic shadow rendering flashlight turned on, in a big countryside scene..

With no/little lag.


It should run fine, as long as the rest of the pc matches the quality of the GPU.

ValvE took care to make Left 4 Dead run smoothly in a big scene, so all should be fine.

Your signature has been erased by a mod - Please reduce the combined size to 600x120 maximum size
Aertic
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Jul 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 29th Dec 2008 21:15
Like Aaagreen said, Valve are master's in the art of optimization, my old rig may not be able to play crysis on low, but I can play L4D on low with 60fps... ^^
Also the L4D engine is a little bit more modified to be a little bit more eyecandy than the original orange box engine, so there may be a small hint of lag in some highly populated area's... D:


"Your greatest teacher is your harshest critic"-'Butterfingers'
Aaagreen
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2007
Location: City 17
Posted: 30th Dec 2008 20:26
Back when I had my old 1gb ram, GeForce 7300gt and old psu, it ran smoothly on full detail, in an online co-op thingy.

Tht was on the demo

Your signature has been erased by a mod - Please reduce the combined size to 600x120 maximum size
General Reed
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Feb 2006
Location:
Posted: 30th Dec 2008 20:36
Indeed, Valve are a collection of elites.

CPU: AMD X2 6000+ 3.0ghz GFX: NVIDIA BFG Geforce 8800GTS 640MB OC-550mhz core RAM: 2048mb

Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 30th Dec 2008 21:32
It is true - anything made in source I've found too, runs quite smoothly, the only problem I ever had with a source game is when Left4Dead had a demo out and it was a BETA version, a problem that was quickly fixed (a memory leak).

FPS rates I've always found quite solid, Left4Dead adding different shader effects and increased detail and more shaders and increased body count, without being too hard on the system shows a decent amount of optimisation. Aside from the fact when you have too many zombies it lags, but doesn't stop from being playable, but it's expected.

Cyborg ART
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Jan 2007
Location: Sweden - Sthlm
Posted: 31st Dec 2008 14:28
So basicly he could play on at least low?

General Reed
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Feb 2006
Location:
Posted: 31st Dec 2008 14:45
Yes. Far cry 1 runs at 90fps, on low, on an intergrated geforce 7050.

CPU: AMD X2 6000+ 3.0ghz GFX: NVIDIA BFG Geforce 8800GTS 640MB OC-550mhz core RAM: 2048mb

Xarshi
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posted: 31st Dec 2008 21:10
Quote: "I just sold my geforce 7950gt and have ordered a high-end geforce 9800 gtx + for about the same price as I sold it. This just proves that the last three numbers REALLY mean the power of the card."


Wrongggggggg. The 9800gtx, note no plus, is faster than a 7950. I mean, a 9800gtx beats two 7950s in SLI. So... not quite with that little power level thing.

However, gtx 280 is the way to go if you want craziness! And... have $500 to spend?
flickenmaste
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd May 2008
Location:
Posted: 3rd Jan 2009 07:55
I bet that card could rune left 4 dead...the gaming cafe where i live has it and their PCs have 8800 Geforces and it runs pretty smooth...but there a few options you need to change to make the game not lock up for 10 secs every 5 mins.

I think you need to change the filtering to bilinear(i think its filtering but just find the video option that has bilinear in it)

turn the shader detail to medium

and you need to disable the one setting(but i forgot what it was lol)


and left 4 dead is an awesome game


[url=http://userbarmaker.com/][img]
R.I.P Troy Dixon
General Reed
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Feb 2006
Location:
Posted: 3rd Jan 2009 09:57
Quote: " PCs have 8800 Geforces and it runs pretty smooth"

Yes, But you do realise that there is not performance difference between an 8800, and a 9800, Other than that the 9800 can be used in TRI-Way SLI, whereas the 8 series cant. Think of a 9300 as a 8300, And an 8300 as a 7600

CPU: AMD X2 6000+ 3.0ghz GFX: NVIDIA BFG Geforce 8800GTS 640MB OC-550mhz core RAM: 2048mb

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-06-08 00:49:28
Your offset time is: 2025-06-08 00:49:28