Quote: "[If you can't see why that thread was locked, I would like to casually introduce you to the AUP. There are sections provided for discussing other languages, this is TGC's forum, for TGC's products. If people can't understand that, then their posts will continue to get locked.
Frankly if you don't use TGC's products, don't come here and slag them off
"
See, I agree that that lock is a bit messed up too if that's the justification for it. I get that this is TGCs forum, provided by TGC itself - but last time I looked the AUP was not in place as a form of censorship to prevent critique of their products.
Not to mention the fact that Python is pretty darn topical if the thread was about Blender
But also: If the AUP
is explicitly designed to prevent us from criticising the products, why does this forum even exist? The products are perfect and we shouldn't need any assistance in using them, right?
I think my point is, taking away the ability to criticise freely (within reason)
makes the community go down the tubes. If we can't express decent opinions of our flaws in product [x] (and how we work around them and whatnot) then why bother? What's next on the chopping block, the ability to mention other languages at all?
Quote: "Wasn't this thread about a lapse in moderation in Geek Culture, but here we are, discussing the topic that you two decide is relevant "
Moving from one topic to another completely related topic is lock worthy? What?
I think this perfectly demonstrates the overreactive nature of the current moderation - two completely tame "Here is what I think related to XYZ" posts on a topic directly connected to the topic of the thread, without personal attacks or any unpleasant content what-so-ever, immediately elicit a lock threat.
09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0