Quote: "I don't think the game is difficult, but does it have to be to be enjoyable? The 'story', the humour, the setting etc. are all so very good that it makes the game an incredible, enjoyable piece of entertainment. Isn't the reason we play games to be entertained? It is for me anyway.
I like puzzle games but unlike some, I'm not looking for a game that I have to look up the solution on gamefaqs or I can't complete a level. I never want to be beaten by a game. If I can't work out the solution because it is so obscure, or it's simply trial and error then I feel the designers have failed. "
^This^ There is nothing that I hate more than having to look up walk-through videos. I was stuck 3 or 4 times and had to find a video in the Single Player. So that to me, means it was the perfect level of difficulty. I could have figured them out eventually, of course, but I'm not the most patient person.
I disagree with anyone saying that the coop is too easy, or easier than single player. The actual levels themselves, are just as complex. The only reason that makes them "easier" is because you have two minds working on the same thing. Play single player with another person in the room and I assure you, it will be much easier than by yourself.
Though I agree that the single player was simply, "Find place to set portal and the level is beat. Finding the portal-able(?) walls are slightly hidden making it harder." However, I think the Multi-player was done perfectly. It felt MUCH more like Portal 1 levels to me. And the fact that I was simply playing coop with FOUR portals... HOURS and HOURS of entertainment.
I am extremely disappointed in the single player because of the lack of re-playability (as I've said several times now) but the MP makes up for it. Though it's also disappointing that I MUST have a partner to enjoy the game. I wish I could just pick up a controller on my own and enjoy the game when I'm by myself. Not that I didn't enjoy my first play through; it was freaking awesome!!!! But I absolutely just can't play it again because, for the most part, the levels are far from being a puzzle. The ones that are, I have played that crap out of already lol. But you can only beat a dead horse so much.
This game SCREEEAAAMMMSSS DLC. I personally think Valve will be incredibly stupid if they didn't make some DLC. I'm always a little sketchy about buying DLC though. Nearly every time I have purchased DLC, even ones that are 800 microsoft points ($10) have been FARRRR from worth purchasing. Two hours of gameplay for $10, SERIOUSLY? That to me is absurd. DLC should always stay on par with the game's quality. At least IMO.
AKA Jenkins