Quote: "Well... all forms of media are anti-Bush. The number of anti-Bush channels/stations are much greater than that of pro-Bush channels/stations."
maybe thats because theres nothing to be pro-bush about, and a lot to be anti bush about.
Quote: "No, I am not religious. But in my 18 years of existance, I rarely have ever seen an Atheist in the attack about a non-Atheist unless sparked by some other relating topic. But I have seen a non-Athiest against and Athiest ALOT of times."
in the last yr in this forum there have been 3 major [offensive] flaimbaits against religeous people started completely unprovoked by athiest members, and a few minor ones.
Quote: "
Any other contries helping out the US with Hurricane Katrina?"
do you actually need help? i mean, you're the richest nation in the world, its not as if you can't help yourself, i mean you're getting more money from your own government than what the whole world gave to the east after that earthquake/tsunami last christmas. you have top notch hospitals and rescue service etc, and isn't the east coast like used to huricanes by now?
if you still need our help, then sure, i'll make a donation, but, do you
really need it?
or maybe its another typical american "its happening elsewhere but we dont care, but when it happens on our soil we want the whole world to bend over" statement?
Quote: "Someone said Blair was just a Bush lap dog? I disagree.As a world leader he must act not only for the U.K., his primary duty, but for whats best for the free world,as Bush must do.Together they are much stronger.Saddam could not be allowed to support ratical Muslims against western civilization and control over half the worlds oil supply.Many nations"
so what you're syaing is we're allowed to bomb the hell out of iraq, continue giving weapons to israel while blocking any aid to palestine, illegally lock people up in guantanamo bay, but when they do so much as throw a stone back at their oppressors (cos they dont have guns/helicopters/tanks), they're the terrorists?
i love your logic, maybe you could be our next Jack Straw: "World Wide Terrorism Must Stop" ... why doesnt he stop it then? tell me that, why the feck doesnt he do what spain did after the madrid bombings?
Quote: "If left to the rest of the world we would
all be back to fuedelism and forced to be Islamic..."
man i love it when people think they know it all about my religeon. im not going into the depths, but i tell you now, YOU WOULD NOT BE FORCED TO BE ISLAMIC. i'll end the popular misconception by pointing out that the majority of the middle east (including iraq) is/was secular.
Even saudi arabia, the most islamic nation in the world (mostly because its where islam was founded) enforces islamic laws, but still doesnt force everyone there to be muslims. OUR RELIGEON IS NOT FASCIST ok?
Quote: "And didnt
the English draw most of the map in the Mideast and Africa dividing the biggest tribes and putting the smallest tribes in charge? Hence all the tribal problems of today."
yes, and you're syaing its a good thing because...
Quote: "If the U.K. sat back and did nothing their would be no U.S..And if the U.S. did nothing their would be no U.K"
yup, thats why the very second we allied with the US, we lost our entire empire. good one. example: us is at war with japan, britain at war with germany, 2 completely idfferent wars. hong kong is british terroriory, we ally with the US, so then that very night japan comes and hong kong is no more. nice diplomacy there.
Quote: "Bush didnt start the war on terrorism or the war with Iraq.I say long live Bush."
yup. it was all those dam muslims fault, they did it all unprovoked, i mean suicide bombers do it so easily, they just say "im going to commit suicide" liek they're not human enough to have had their lives ruined by whatever ragime it was that didnt ruin it first.
wow, im starting to make less sense than you are!
and ps, you guys realise that some top boardroom member of fox news is a relative of george bush?
