Oneka... It was kinda a joke...
if time stands still, and you travel over a distance...
v=d/t
so if you get to another galaxy
v=10^10^10/1
Quote: "Now answer me this question: If we were to go out and look for life on other planets, and we aren't going to look where we find water, what are we going to look for? If you can figure that out, NASA and the world's top universities will all be throwing money your way, and lots of it, because you'll have solved a riddle they've been trying to answer for decades/ centuries."
First off, it depends on the environment. If the environment is arid and rocky that indicates that any life form their will be higly immobile. Why? We are mobile because OF water. it is a fluid that maintains the shape of the cells and allows motion via lubricant and elasticity.
If the environment is earth like, we can expect to see mobile creatures.
If the environment is gasious expect small creatures, like birds, only better. These guys will be able to change their internal presures to rise in the atmospher. Due to this ability they will be able to maintain an altitude with little work.
It isn't hard to imagine different life... we just don't like to.
E=MC^2 is similar to the formula for kinetic energy Ke=MV^2/2
If you fully destroy a mass greater then half of your own, you will produce enough joules to go faster then the speed of light. But wait, you say, you don't get 100% conversion... well...
PV=nRT
T=J/(n*MM*Cp)
P=RJ/(MM*Cp*V)
J=E
E=mC^2
m=grams=g
P=R*g*C^2/(MM*Cp*V)
P=N-s
N-s=g*m/s
Velocity=R*mass*C^2/(Molar Mass of Gas * Specific Heat of Gas * Volume of Chamber * Mass of Propelled Object)
Now we just convert the energy of destroying some mass to heat, and heat up a gas to provive massive amounts of thrust. Of course this equation does not account for anything OUTSIDE the combustion chamber. But you get the general idea. I am not saying it is right, all I did was plug formuals together in a resonable fasion. It shows that formulas can not be trusted for what they are, in this case I can travel faster then the speed of light because there is no restrictions on the three formulas I combinded.
I also think that you can't talk about Casimir unless you actually study it. What you said is the equivalent of a medical student saying we don't know how to build a computer because he never studied engineering to make sense of things. Quantom theorists can probally give you all kinds of situations where the Casimir Effect may occur. Other people might be able to tell you how to produce those those situations. The issue? Money and Time. Never will we be right on the first guess, and in order to narrow it down you need a lot of money and time, and staff... stuff...
Most everything you need to build it is right there in front of you, the problem is the ammount of data. Some data helps, some doesn't some is conflicting... And until we have civilian space craft going to saturn to see the rings, no idiot will even DARE working on it. Why? Patents. They want to reach a large commercail base, NASA will buy what? 3 engines a year? It would be billions of dollars wasted. And no one will do it just for the discovery. Sorry, but America is totally driven by Corporations, they provide the money, they provide the equiptment... you just have to give them 1500% back.
Jeku... I am really getting annoyed at that. Ever since I was corrected I looked at that like what the hell was I thinking. We do have an FPS, technically at 100FPS we can't diferentiate the refresh rate of a television. Although at 200FPS air force pilots can acuratly name air craft. However this is a flash from a projector in a dark room. How fast our eye can really see? I'd say even faster then 200FPS, but we filter out the rest.
Mosillivo: Fires Rage, Earth Rumble, Evil Reigns, Cities Tumble
Join the NJL: The War Has Begun, Which Side Are You On?
Nunticaelitusphobic (Scared of Internet)
