Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Who will be undefeated after this sunday?

Author
Message
Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 17:38
I think the title says it all, will it be the Colts or the Pats? Both are the two true powerhouses of the NFL at the moment and having two undefeated teams facing each other this far into the season is pretty amazing.

My thoughts, I don't care what this years totals say, Manning is the better Quarterback, running game is about equal, defense goes to the Pats. Special teams is tough, I think Vinatieri is the better clutch kicker, but the Pats have great return men. I think it will come down to coaching in this game and I have to give that to the Pats. So my prediction Pats by 11.

Anyone else?

Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:00 Edited at: 1st Nov 2007 22:00
Getting people here to care about (American) Football is like trying to market the PS3 in Afghanistan.

The few odd black sheep may come out though.

Ron Erickson
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:05
Quote: "Getting people here to care about (American) Football is like trying to market the PS3 in Afghanistan."


NFL football is, by far, the most popular sport in the US.

I think the PATS will win. I can't stand them and would love to see them lose, but they are too strong this year. I wouldn't be suprised if they go undefeated. I'd love to see the Steelers beat them in Foxboro on Dec.9th, but I'm afraid that is pretty unlikely too.


a.k.a WOLF!
Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:08
Quote: "NFL football is, by far, the most popular sport in the US."


Was talking about the UK geek community.

Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:17
Quote: "Was talking about the UK geek community."


They'll come around I was actually suprised to see how many people turned out for the Giants-Miami game in London last Sunday. Looks like Goodell is pushing to market the game more overseas (even though the playoffs and Superbowl are already carried in about 85% of the world)

If I remember something Rich said one time it was that the majority of TGC product owners etc are from the US, so stands to reason that there are alot of US members on the board.

Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:20
Quote: "NFL football is, by far, the most popular sport in the US"

true, but club football is, by far, the most popular sport in the rest of the world . Although it was interesting to see the NY Giants trying to play against the Dolphins in Wembley a short while back. A proper football pitch proved very difficult for them to play on (they dig into the ground more in American Football, or so it seems), but the game did seem to be a success, even though a number of Americans went to England to see the match. It would be pretty awesome if there was a 50/50 share of American football in europe and proper football ("soccer") in the US.

I'd absolutely love it if Chelsea and Manchester United, or Liverpool and Arsenal, came to play in the United States. John Terry (Chelsea's Captain) seemed to think that was going to happen in the near future, but the NFL players interviewed on Sky Sports after the match acted like they only cared about the NFL getting popular in Europe, not even mentioning "soccer" in the interviews Sky showed. And that's why I hope the NFL is never, ever going to get huge in the rest of the world. Until we Americans realize that American football isn't the best sport in the world, only the favored sport in this single country, I don't think the NFL deserves to get famous internationally. But that's just my opinion . But if the NFL got more popular in the UK and "soccer" got more popular here in the US, with athletes from both sports being ambassadors for both sports equally in both countries, I'd be down for that.

Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:27
Quote: "A proper football pitch proved very difficult for them to play on (they dig into the ground more in American Football, or so it seems)"


Yeah natural grass gets shredded in football, especially in heavy rain, you will see a long stripe of mud between the hashmarks all the way down the field. Thats why most teams here have gone to turf (not astroturf) but a new material that acts and feels like grass, but is strong enough to survive.

I would like to see soccer take off here, and lord knows they have tried for decades, but until either top athletes from overseas come to play here or we can get our good athletes to pursue it, we just don't watch (as a nation). I guess when a 15 year old can be a marquis player here there is something wrong.

Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:29
I wish there were more general sports fans on TGC. I'd love to discuss boxing/MMA, but it's something only a small minority will like.

I also noticed Matt started a boxing thread a long while ago while I was inactive from TGC about the huge Oscar/Mayweather fight. Shame I wasn't there to reply to your moronic statement about MMA.

Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:33
Heh MMA, really popular in my area, 4 schools in fact, as well as 2 schools that feed directly into the WWE. The only downside I ever find in MMA is the 7 second knockout seems popular, and heaven help you watching a match of 2 grapplers.

Benjamin
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:37
Quote: "I wish there were more general sports fans on TGC. I'd love to discuss boxing/MMA, but it's something only a small minority will like."

We can talk about people getting elbowed in the eye and such if you want.

Tempest (DBP/DBCe)
Multisync V1 (DBP/DBCe)
Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 22:38 Edited at: 1st Nov 2007 22:38
Quote: "The only downside I ever find in MMA is the 7 second knockout seems popular, and heaven help you watching a match of 2 grapplers.
"


It's thankfully a sport that will always mostly stay popular among the practitioners and enthusiasts, due to it's technical nature. Things can get real sour when they go main stream.

Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 23:16
Quote: "I would like to see soccer take off here, and lord knows they have tried for decades, but until either top athletes from overseas come to play here or we can get our good athletes to pursue it, we just don't watch (as a nation). I guess when a 15 year old can be a marquis player here there is something wrong."

Terribly sad but true. It was incredible to see how much David Beckham did for the sport in the US in such a short period of time, packing the NY Giants stadium for the NY Red Bulls vs. LA Galaxy match. When the trade happened, I genuinely thought it was a poor tactic, but it worked to some extent. Still, he's not exactly a top-flight footballer anymore, not when you compare him to the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo, Wayne Rooney, Kaka, etc. We need players like *that* in the US. And also, youth clubs! Some of the best talent in the rest of the world comes out of youth clubs. Do the Red Bulls or Galaxy or New England Revolution even have U19, U17, etc. teams that play in leagues? If they do, MLS doesn't do much to promote the games, and certainly they should be trying as much.

Quote: "I also noticed Matt started a boxing thread a long while ago while I was inactive from TGC about the huge Oscar/Mayweather fight. Shame I wasn't there to reply to your moronic statement about MMA."

I take it you're referencing my comments about UFC being all violence and no strategy? Well, go out and talk to a normal fan Meg. UFC fans think boxing is boring and the UFC is action-oriented. And from what I've seen, they're right. What does the UFC market: violence or strategy? I'm not saying boxing is more tactical than MMA, but it's pretty obvious why people are moving in flocks from boxing to MMA, and it has nothing at all to do with tactical prowess. I'm bias coming from a family of boxing fans, and you're bias being a MMA athlete yourself, but can we at least both agree that UFC is stealing boxing's spotlight because it's a heck of a lot more gruesome, and that's what layman fans like?

Deathead
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Oct 2006
Location:
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 23:26
This will be a hard one. I like NFL is one of my favourite sports even though I'm british I like American Football better than rubgy and everysingle sport here. And I also love NHL.

Robert F
User Banned
Posted: 1st Nov 2007 23:30
Patriots by a long shot, colts just dont have good enough defense, quite frankly nobody does against the pats. If tom brady keeps playing the way he is right now, he will break records. Not saying the colts suck or anything, I just dont think they have what it takes to beat the pats. I mean look at mike vrabel, he plays like five positions. Just what i think, you can think what you want. Go Pats.

Phaelax
DBPro Master
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Apr 2003
Location: Metropia
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 01:10
UFC is way better than boxing, it doesn't limit fighters to 1 particular style and lets the real better fighter shine. (usually)


Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 05:30
Boxing isn't limited to one style either... there's dozens of different types of boxers out there. The rules are (seemingly) more confining, but you won't find many similarities between, say, Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Ricky Hatton... other than the fact they're both punching.

Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 05:45 Edited at: 2nd Nov 2007 05:51
Matt, your mindset s fairly generic and you're definitely not alone. There are plenty among the flock out there who know nothing about MMA.

Since it's been explainded in detail on countless other forums and martial art sites, I'll just link you to this video.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=7jJgg3XHLhs

Also, before you begin with the bias crap, let me point out that I do boxing, and many MMA fighters also happen to be amateur/pro boxers.

An example would be folk like former UFC lightweight champ Jens Pulver, who also happens to be a proffesional boxer with a perfect record. Ooops, but I guess none of that quite fits into your MMA grudge.

DrewG
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Aug 2005
Location:
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 05:48
Who cares about who will win? It's just a game.

Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 06:58
Quote: "An example would be folk like former UFC lightweight champ Jens Pulver, who also happens to be a proffesional boxer with a perfect record. Ooops, but I guess none of that quite fits into your MMA grudge."


Yes he pro boxed for a year had a 4-0 record and 3 ko's, however he fought nobodies, as well he should early on, but come on the only guy who was not a complete schmuck he fought was Vincent, and they were short round fights (not scedueled for 12). I don't want to take anything away from him but alot of guys go 10-0 when on the junior circut only to get plowed on the senior. MMA is very entertaining and I enjoy watching it, but they have no need to conserve anything because they know its over in 3 rounds.

Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 08:09
Well, if you can't see that UFC is stealing a lot of the spotlight from boxing due to MMA having higher levels of violence, and that violence appealing to the mass public, you're a lot more biased that you realize. Regardless of how orderly and tactical MMA tries to be, it's still a lot more violent. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, or that I'm opposed to violence in any way, but let's face it, that's why MMA skyrocketed passed boxing in popularity in the last few years. And while MMA fighters might also be boxers, how many boxers are also into MMA? If you guessed "not many," you're on the right track . In fact, I can't think of a single top 100 boxer in the world who does MMA, although maybe there's one or two that I've never heard of.

At the end of the day, my "grudge" isn't with MMA as a sport, it's with MMA stealing boxing fans. You can't begin to argue that boxing has been around a heck of a lot longer than MMA (as an organized sport), and that the number of boxing legends by far outweigh the number of MMA celebrities. And I defy you to name a single MMA fighter whose name you'll likely find in history books fifty years from now... Muhammed Ali, Sugar Ray Leonard, and quite a few others were in mine when I was in High School. And coming from a family of boxing fans, some of whom had amateur and low-tier professional careers, and growing up watching all of the major title fights of our era from the early 1980's until the present, I can safely speak for serious boxing fans all around the world that MMA isn't our cup of tea, and it's threatening the sacred sweet science in popularity to a point where boxing might not be around in the mainstream a decade or two from now. And you're welcome to drive a few hours south and I'll introduce you to people who honestly believe MMA takes more talent than boxing... and being a hardcore boxing fan, that makes me absolutely furious. That's why I don't like MMA, and will always be opposed to it. If boxing suddenly sprouted up to threaten the very institution of MMA in the same ways, wouldn't it make you just as mad?

Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 10:17 Edited at: 2nd Nov 2007 10:20
I don't think MMA has stolen many true boxing fans, what it has taken are 13-17 year old boys who might later become boxing fans. If anything I think it has stolen more wrestling fans.

Any sport can be appeal to the masses if there are no rules (or the rules are exceptionally lax). I would watch soccer if a player could knee the other guy in the groin, toss an uppercut, then steal the ball. Heck put the goalie in a choke hold while someone else scores, sounds fun to me

Dazzag
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Aug 2002
Location: Cyprus
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 11:30 Edited at: 2nd Nov 2007 11:31
Quote: "It was incredible to see how much David Beckham did for the sport in the US in such a short period of time"
Yeah, but he went for the money. He was past his prime and they gave him an incredible offer. Mainly because they knew he was an advertising magnet. Any top flight player would not even consider such a move unless it involved oodles of cash (much more than the oodles of cash they already get). It's all about the passion and the history, and there is none there. I mean c'mon, Manchester United, Liverpool, Barcelona, Real Madrid, AC Milan, Inter Milan, Ajax, (I could go on for a long time), and... LA Galaxy? Who now? Nah.

Cheers

I am 99% probably lying in bed right now... so don't blame me for crappy typing
Current fave quote : "She was like a candle in the wind.... unreliable...."
Kentaree
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2002
Location: Clonmel, Ireland
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 13:37
Quote: "Who cares about who will win? It's just a game."


Exactly, and people SUPPORT teams, so they care. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean other people don't

Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 14:15 Edited at: 2nd Nov 2007 14:19
And I don't think it matters who jens fought...the point is, he's a boxer. First it was claimed that MMA guys don't have the skill to box, and I dismissed that by pointing out one of the top guys who boxes. (And can point out many more) Having no argument left, you resort to saying "yeah...well...he's not among the top boxers!". Cheesy.

Quote: "how many boxers are also into MMA?
I can't think of a single top 100 boxer in the world"


Coincidently, the top one is. Oops.
George Foreman would have preferred MMA over boxing

Many boxers respect MMA for it's skill and fine technical aspects. Mayweather has apologized in public for his MMA sh*t talk after being openly challenged to back his ideas, and if guys like Oscar de la Hoya are working with UFC fighters on their boxing, then that's saying something about the attitude of boxers towards MMA.

Quote: "I'll introduce you to people who honestly believe MMA takes more talent than boxing"


Apples and oranges. No point in even replying.

Quote: "If boxing suddenly sprouted up to threaten the very institution of MMA in the same ways, wouldn't it make you just as mad?"


Why would it? I'd still continue hitting the gym 3 days a week working on my muay thai and grappling, so why would I give a crap? No one from MMA is going over to boxing, even many ARE boxing fans and boxers.

You claim MMA contains more violence...but isn't that why people watch boxing in the first place? They used to call it a combat sport...and now that a new combat sport has come up, it has been made obvious to the world what people really want to see.

Kentaree
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2002
Location: Clonmel, Ireland
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 14:31
Personally I don't see the appeal in getting punched and/or kicked (depending on sport) in the face for sport. I'd definitely never watch either, whether it's just using hands, or hands, feet and any other spare limbs you have that you can use. In the end, it all comes down to personal taste, I can well imagine people who don't like watching people run around a field trying to knock a ball into a net with their feet...

Ron Erickson
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 15:33
It is funny to hear someone call a sport VIOLENT in comparison to another sport where the goal is to hit each other and knock each other out. They are the SAME in terms of violence. If anything, boxing is more violent in terms of long-term effects on competitors.

Comparing "skill" between boxing and MMA is like comparing skill between figure skating and ice hockey. In one sport, all you have to do is skate. So, you can really, really develop that skill. In the other, you have to know how to skate and do it well. Maybe not as good as a figure skater, but it is still an important part of being good. A hockey player developing his skating skills to the expertice of a figure skater would be wasted effort. There are too many other things that he has to worry about to be good at his sport. The pay-off for that level of skill versus the effort required to get there would only hamper his ability in other areas.
With all of that said, I think most hockey players could do better at figure skating than figure skaters could do at hockey


The other thing that bothers me about Matt's post is that he somehow "blames" MMA for taking fans away from boxing. Boxing fell as a sport long before MMA became popular. Boxing just flat out sucks these days. There is absolutely NO heavyweight devision. Decisions are so obviously fixed to promote re-matches and/or protect the more popular fighters. I LOVE the sport of boxing but absolutely refuse to watch any of it until this improves. Seriously, there seems to be more "sport" in WWE wrestling than there is in boxing these days. MMA is filling in the hole that boxing left by it's own doing.


a.k.a WOLF!
Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 15:53
Quote: "And I don't think it matters who jens fought...the point is, he's a boxer. First it was claimed that MMA guys don't have the skill to box, and I dismissed that by pointing out one of the top guys who boxes. (And can point out many more) Having no argument left, you resort to saying "yeah...well...he's not among the top boxers!". Cheesy. "


Well with that reasoning I guess I could go choke out up a couple of 12 year old school girls and say I have the skills to be an MMA fighter. If he had what it takes to be a solid boxer why wouldn't he stay, unless MMA offers $20 million purses win or lose like top draw boxing matches do?

I can understand Foreman preffering to have been an MMA fighter (if the money was the same) he had little to no defense, his fight was "I'm a house with fists try to knock me out before I finally connect with a punch". Don't get me wrong I loved watching Foreman fight (except that debacle of a fight with Briggs), he was just never much of a technical fighter, just a big guy who could take alot of punches.

Quote: "Many boxers respect MMA for it's skill and fine technical aspects. Mayweather has apologized in public for his MMA sh*t talk after being openly challenged to back his ideas, and if guys like Oscar de la Hoya are working with UFC fighters on their boxing, then that's saying something about the attitude of boxers towards MMA."


I don't think anyone is saying there is no skill involved in MMA. I will say MMA revolves around offense and near no-existant defense.

Quote: "Apples and oranges. No point in even replying."

Much like the boxing rep in the video you posted, the old Apples to Oranges reply is used to try to support a weak argument, I don't think your position is weak, but that is what this statement implies.

Quote: "You claim MMA contains more violence...but isn't that why people watch boxing in the first place? They used to call it a combat sport...and now that a new combat sport has come up, it has been made obvious to the world what people really want to see."


Absolutely, people want more blood, no rules, and quick KO's. Giving people what they want is why Baywatch was popular, junk show with alot of breasts.

Boxing has its own problems, and has lost alot of fans because of them. the main things that would bring people back to boxing would be.

1) getting rid of the dirty side (ala Don King)

2) Not to be racist, but a white heavyweight champ. I hate to say this, but quite true, white guys do well in MMA and it can be seen in the demographic of who is watching here in the US.

Ron Erickson
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 16:23
Quote: "I don't think anyone is saying there is no skill involved in MMA. I will say MMA revolves around offense and near no-existant defense."


Then you don't understand MMA. Defense in MMA is more about control. For instance, take the guard position. While most people see the person on the bottom and see them take a few shots here and there, they actually have good control of their opponents shots. Hits may land, but a person that has a good "gaurd" can really control how much the opponent has behind the shots by using his hips. A person with a bad "guard" is going to get pounded if he ends up on his back. There is tons of defense to MMA. It just isn't as obvious as what you see in boxing.


a.k.a WOLF!
FredP
Retired Moderator
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Feb 2006
Location: Indiana
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 17:34
The Colts will win Sunday.

Please have mercy and use the search function.
Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 20:05
Quote: "I don't think MMA has stolen many true boxing fans, what it has taken are 13-17 year old boys who might later become boxing fans. If anything I think it has stolen more wrestling fans."

That's true, serious boxing fans will always be loyal, but the less hardcore fans switching to MMA has definitely hurt the sport's financial institutions. I remember hearing something along the lines of HBO dropping boxing alltogether in a few years as a result. Even the major title fights simply aren't drawing in the same numbers that they used to .

Quote: "I mean c'mon, Manchester United, Liverpool, Barcelona, Real Madrid, AC Milan, Inter Milan, Ajax, (I could go on for a long time), and... LA Galaxy? Who now? Nah."

That's why I think MLS teams should be allowed to play in UEFA games. But we're not European so of course it'd never happen, hehe.

Quote: "Coincidently, the top one is. Oops."

George Foreman hasn't been a boxer in ten years! Floyd Mayweather Jr. is the undefeated pound-for-pound boxer in the world... I think that makes HIM the top boxer, doesn't it? George Foreman hasn't been a world champion since, oh, 1994 I think? Maybe 1995... well over ten years ago regardless. He hasn't even been directly associated with boxing since 2003 or 2004 when he left HBO... as a commentator!

Quote: "Why would it? I'd still continue hitting the gym 3 days a week working on my muay thai and grappling, so why would I give a crap? No one from MMA is going over to boxing, even many ARE boxing fans and boxers."

That's beside the point. If boxing did somehow surpass MMA in ratings, and a number of MMA fans, serious or not, stopped caring about MMA and flocked to boxing, wouldn't you be equally mad?

Quote: "You claim MMA contains more violence...but isn't that why people watch boxing in the first place? They used to call it a combat sport...and now that a new combat sport has come up, it has been made obvious to the world what people really want to see."

See, that proves my bias statement from before. No serious boxing fan watches fights because it's violent. They watch it because boxers are artists. They aren't just standing in the middle of the ring punching the crap out of each other (well, unless we're talking about the Gatti/ Ward trilogy, lol). My entire point is that MMA is stealing the Johnny-come-lately fans who don't really respect it as a sport, and while I may not respect those fans, losing them does financially and reputationally injure the institution of boxing.

Quote: "If anything, boxing is more violent in terms of long-term effects on competitors."

We don't really know that. MMA hasn't been around long enough for us to know what long term effects it has on fighters. And a number of boxers have retired without any mental problems, like the afforementioned George Foreman. We see retired boxers like Riddick Bowe and Joe Frazier and how they've been traumatized by their injuries over the long term, but not all fighters succumb to that.

Quote: "Boxing fell as a sport long before MMA became popular."

I might not be able to see that because of how into boxing I am, but there have been a lot of really fantastic fights in the past decade. Roy Jones (before his fall from grace), Oscar De La Hoya, Floyd Mayweather, Manny Pacquiao, Ricky Hatton, Marco Antonio Barrera, the Marquez brothers, Shane Mosley, Vitali and Wladimir Klitschko, Hassim Rahman, and Lennox Lewis were all producing really awesome fights in the past 10 years, and the ratings weren't slipping until MMA came along, that I know of anyway.

Quote: "Don't get me wrong I loved watching Foreman fight (except that debacle of a fight with Briggs), he was just never much of a technical fighter, just a big guy who could take alot of punches"

hehe like his classic Ali fight... he proved his lack of technical prowess during that bout. Yeah, Foreman is a great example of a hitter with no boxing skills. Not that he's bad or anything, but boxers usually were able to dismantle him after Ali opened him up.

Quote: "I hate to say this, but quite true, white guys do well in MMA and it can be seen in the demographic of who is watching here in the US"

My uncle (who is black) had a pretty funny comment about how white guys are afraid to hit black guys or they might appear rascist, and that's why white boxers never make it lol. But on a serious note, there's been a few white champions in the past decade, some of whom I named earlier. But I think the ratio of white and black boxers is about the same or maybe even better today than it was back in the 1960's and 1970's. Who was the last really great white boxing legend anyway? Dempsey? Braddock? It's been a while .

Luciferia
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jan 2007
Location: England
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 20:30
My rugby club and school team will both be undefeated after this sunday. Way more important than some american nfl piffle...
Deathead
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Oct 2006
Location:
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 21:02
@Luciferia: I like NFL better than rugby.
Quote: "about how white guys are afraid to hit black guys or they might appear rascist"

Don't blame them if you just have a argument with some at my school they'll go are you being racist and get a gang on you. Its very stupid I know. Its the same with other people in our school though.:S Anyways lets not slide into the racism marker.

gamebird
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Jun 2007
Location:
Posted: 2nd Nov 2007 22:31
Quote: "I'd love to see the Steelers beat them in Foxboro on Dec.9th, but I'm afraid that is pretty unlikely too."


The steelers are a distant memory in my mind.
Dazzag
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Aug 2002
Location: Cyprus
Posted: 3rd Nov 2007 00:58
Quote: "That's why I think MLS teams should be allowed to play in UEFA games"
Sums it up right there. What is an MLS team? Pretty sure 99% of football fans (in the UK at least, but I'm betting the rest of europe too) haven't the foggiest what the MLS TLA stands for. And don't mention the "EPL" (spit). It's the premier league. People can just about still get away with calling it the first division too (esp. if they are your dad) but not the EPL. Ever.

Cheers

I am 99% probably lying in bed right now... so don't blame me for crappy typing
Current fave quote : "She was like a candle in the wind.... unreliable...."
FredP
Retired Moderator
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Feb 2006
Location: Indiana
Posted: 3rd Nov 2007 01:03
I have to agree.I don't know what most of what was in your post means..

Please have mercy and use the search function.
Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 3rd Nov 2007 06:28 Edited at: 3rd Nov 2007 06:38
Comments from a few posters in this thread simply show that:

a) They have never actually done any MMA training, including but not limited to jujutsu, muay thai or wrestling.

b) Though they may not be practitioners of martial arts, they have little to no technical knowledge of how matches are actually carried out

c) They no understanding of the inner politics of MMA.

Some can't even get their facts/history straight. MMA to young to show long-term affects? Don't mean to throw the typical American ignorance comment around, but Matt, you do realize MMA has been around for ages before it came to the US? Also, there are many fighters who have started their careers, competed, and retired. They are all fine right now. (With some even occasionally coming out of retirement for a new ass whoopin' e.g Frank Shamrock, Bas Rutten)

Oh, the poor boxing fans, desperately clinging on to nostalgic matches between old legends, ranting about how much more skill the sweet science requires than anything else, and complaining about "violence" in MMA. Two guys are beating each other senseless, to the dangerous point where one boxer's brain is simply over gushing with adrenaline and he can no longer stand. And MMA is a lot more violent and dangerous...Huh???

As Ron said, boxing is sucking ass, period. Multiple organizations made it hard for fans to keep up or even have an undisputed champion.

Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 3rd Nov 2007 20:36
Well, everyone is entitled to their own opinions, mine is that boxing is more entertaining than MMA. And again, I'd like to point out that most boxers retire without long-term problems. We look at Ali (whose problems have nothing to do with his boxing career), Riddick Bowe, and a small handful of others and say "well, boxing is evil, look what happens to the fighters," but we forget how many boxers are perfectly healthy and normal long after their careers end, without so much as a speech impediment. For every boxer you can name with problems after retirement, I can name at least three from memory without problems.

And really, whether boxing is *actually* more violent than MMA is beside the point. The arguement is about what layman fans think, or at least that's the point I've been trying to make since the start of this debate. The point is, the general layman fans think MMA is more violent than boxing, and that's why many of them would rather watch it. And sure, maybe the mass public is mis-informed, but aren't they always? Anyway, point is, I couldn't possibly claim to know nearly as much about MMA as you Meg, but while I may not know every line of source code in Windows Vista, I'm still entitled to the opinion that I don't like it, don't want it, and don't need it, aren't I?

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 3rd Nov 2007 22:56
This is a typical Matt rant.

Matt - You are "angry" that boxing fans are watching MMA games now? Isn't that completely up to them, and why should it take away from your own personal enjoyment? The power of the consumer is strong--- if throngs of fans are "converting", it's proof that MMA games are more enjoyable.

As for your "boxers are artists" stance, of which I find fairly funny, have you even watched an MMA tournament? It is highly technical and the fighters don't just stand there and punch the crap out of each as you put it. Your views are so narrow-minded and frustrating

bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 3rd Nov 2007 23:09 Edited at: 3rd Nov 2007 23:09
Jeku, it sucks because you can't watch a decent boxing match anywhere, everywhere I go I see that MMA crap!

It's so lame, seriously, it's a couple dudes climbing on each other half the time


The greatest multiplayer text adventure ever...
Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 4th Nov 2007 01:28
Many boxing fans I know are fans of "the arts" in general. Whether it's boxing, kick boxing, wrestling, grappling, Judo, or MMA. They are actually excited to see boxing do well in MMA, with top MMA fighters having personal coaches just for boxing.

If you're angry, then stay angry. The world will move on, and no one will care. Don't worry, I still like you Mtt.

Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 4th Nov 2007 21:49
Quote: "This is a typical Matt rant."

I've been extremely level-headed in this thread about things I think. Meg set out to get me riled up because he enjoys arguing with me, regardless of whether or not my points are valid. I've made a pretty good arguement with what I thought were strong points and was insulted as a response... but I'm the bad guy here?

Quote: "Matt - You are "angry" that boxing fans are watching MMA games now? Isn't that completely up to them, and why should it take away from your own personal enjoyment?"

As Jerico pointed out, It's nearly impossible to have a decent conversation about boxing anymore, because so many people want to yap about MMA. Showtime, one of the big boxing networks, has almost entirely dropped boxing in favor of MMA (they still show boxing matches, but not nearly as often as they used to), and HBO is only showing two or three matches a month, whereas before they often showed two matches per weekend. So yes, I can definitely say MMA is taking away from my own personal enjoyment.

Quote: "As for your "boxers are artists" stance, of which I find fairly funny, have you even watched an MMA tournament? It is highly technical and the fighters don't just stand there and punch the crap out of each as you put it. Your views are so narrow-minded and frustrating"

Okay, if you don't think boxing is an art form and you find it funny I said that, you'll do a far better job at firing me up than Meg could ever do. You obviously only read one or two words from my posts, and yet I'm the narrow-minded one? I never once said MMA is talentless. I did however say repeatedly that to a layman, MMA appears more violent than boxing, and THAT is why people are abandoning boxing in droves. It has absolutely nothing to do with how technical or talented MMA is. Meg doesn't see that because he does MMA himself, and talks to MMA people all day... but I seriously challenge you to go talk to a stranger who doesn't know much about either sport (like, you know, most of the population of the world) and see why they specifically like MMA. Then you can come back and apologize for taking things I've said out of context.

Quote: "Many boxing fans I know are fans of "the arts" in general."

You obviously don't know any hardcore boxing fans then. If you did, this wouldn't be the first time someone expressed these views to you, and that's a fact. And there are still millions of them around the world, people who simply don't care for MMA and won't "switch" down the road. It's not like I'm the only person in the world who still loves boxing and doesn't care for MMA. That's like saying someone who likes American Football will more than likely appreciate Association Football . It's the most rediculous thing I've ever heard.

I love how I'm labeled as the jerk whenever I disagree with someone, regardless of what I'm actually saying, what my arguement is, and whether or not I actually started the arguement or not. If I take a stance on a topic it's instantly the wrong side to be on, as though my opinion doesn't matter and shouldn't be taken seriously. I didn't say anything outlandish or stupid during this arguement, not once, at all. A lot of other boxing fans feel the same way as me. And I haven't exploded during this arguement... yet... and I seriously think that's exactly what Meg wants. In fact, Meg's been the one ranting and raving and throwing insults around left and right. But you guys are right, I'm the bad guy here . Seriously, if that's how people treat views different from their own on TGC, making arguements out of debates but then blaming that twist on me, it makes me wonder why I keep coming back.

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 4th Nov 2007 22:57
Matt - You're being way too sensitive here, this isn't a dig at you, honestly, I just find it funny that somebody would get so defensive because another sport is more popular than their own.

Quote: "It's nearly impossible to have a decent conversation about boxing anymore, because so many people want to yap about MMA"


Because... it's more popular? I'm still not comprehending how it's a bad thing when a sport becomes popular. I would liken that to a Mario fan getting all up in arms when people talk about Ratchet and Clank. They're both valid games, but in the real world and reality trends come and go, things get more popular then die and disappear almost overnight. I wouldn't get so worked up over it

Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 00:26
Quote: "Because... it's more popular? I'm still not comprehending how it's a bad thing when a sport becomes popular."

I pointed out earlier that I'm just bias toward boxing, and Meg is bias about MMA, but that comment inadvertantly turned into an incendiary device. It does annoy me that MMA is stealing fans and that it's having an effect on boxing as a whole, but it's only an opinion, and Meg takes it as a seriously offensive comment directed solely at him . Instead of debating, he was arguing (with his typical insults in the classic Megaton style), and that's what really set me off. He was gone for a long time and doesn't know that I'm not the ranting raving lunatic I used to be, and I've been trying my darndest to contribute to the community, get along with everyone, and not tick people off. So when I start getting treated like "typical me" from however long ago, it does bother me. But I guess I deserve it for all the times I started arguements in the past.

Hobgoblin Lord
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 29th Oct 2005
Location: Fall River, MA USA
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 02:55
Well the question has been answered, what a game, both defenses did a pretty damn good job. In the end however the Pats came through (even though in my opinion the refs seemed determined to give it to Indy I mean calling non existant pass interference and ignoring Indy linebackers sqaure dancing with pats recievers in the middle of the field). Still it was a great game, perhaps one of the best regular season match ups of all time.

Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 05:48
Throwing Megaton style insults around is what I do best. I didn't even call you a moron yet...Jeku is right, you ARE sensitive!

Quote: "You obviously don't know any hardcore boxing fans then."


Harcore > Fanatical > Cultist

Don't really want to know any "hardcore" boxing fans either. Ever talked to ANYONE hardcore for ANYTHING without getting tired of talking to them within the first few minutes? We neither. Hardcore FPS/MMO fans who claim what they do is the best, with the rest being crap?

I watch the odd boxing fight on the Fight Network. I would not say I'm hardcore MMA, just passionate. I only bring it up in conversation with other MMA fans. Many people at school/work may know me for months/years without ever finding out I do MMA, because that's how rarely I talk about it.

Benjamin
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 06:39
Quote: "I didn't even call you a moron yet...Jeku is right, you ARE sensitive!"

Aren't we just a bit old for this?

Tempest (DBP/DBCe)
Multisync V1 (DBP/DBCe)
Matt Rock
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2005
Location: Binghamton NY USA
Posted: 5th Nov 2007 20:20
Quote: "I only bring it up in conversation with other MMA fans."

I can think of one instance where that's not true

And being a hardcore fan of something doesn't necessarily mean you'd rudely defend it, and only talk about that one thing all of the time. It just means you care about it deeply and aren't interested in other, somewhat-similar things. It's not like I'm saying "become a boxing fan or I'll make you drink this Kool-Aid" lol.

Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 7th Nov 2007 05:28 Edited at: 7th Nov 2007 05:30
Quote: "I can think of one instance where that's not true "


Obviously I will *mention* if we're talking about hobbies, but I will never seriously discuss it with anyone other than an mma fan. Why? Because it's a pain in the ass.

I know next to nothing about hockey, and I can rattle off an exact amount of "one" players from the NHL...so when people come up to me and start saying "Hey dude what the hell was up with player x and player z the other night?? What was coach y thinking?? I think they've made serious mistakes by getting rid of players a, b, c and d this season don't you think so?" I usually return a blank look. The same look I would get back if I were to bring up Randy Couture or George St.Pierre, or god forbid, Takanori Gomi.

Even my own girlfriend doesn't exactly know what I do. Muay Thai? That rolling around on the floor thing? The thing where you punch and kick AND roll around on the floor? The concepts are just too difficult for her to grasp.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-19 11:30:29
Your offset time is: 2024-11-19 11:30:29