Quote: "I just find it hilarious how you think you're qualified to judge every gamer by your own likes/dislikes. This is called conceit "
Hey, it's not like conceit is a sin or anything
is it my fault I can't be stopped by any game I've ever played? No, that's genetics my friend
okay, now THAT was conceit
Anyway, I just don't see the point in playing games without a challenge, and I never will. I can't imagine paying $50 for a game that I'll just play "casually." That's probably why I don't like Bejeweled. To me, every time I fire up Battlefield it's sport, it's war, "pack your lunch because we're going to town pal." For me, owning a game and pwning a game go hand-in-hand... if I buy it, I'm planning on beating it, and I don't want someone to explain to me how to go about it either. If you're going to drive around blowing crap up in GTA, fine, use a cheat code if that's your thing, but if you're going to make yourself invincible just to beat missions, then that's pretty lame imo, and there's a lot of people out there who do that, and I'll never understand why/ how.
Quote: "And quit changing your stance. You went from saying *all* people who use cheats are evil to saying it's bad if you buy a Prima walkthrough the second you buy a game. Big difference."
I NEVER changed my stance. Not once, and I beg you to find any point where I did. This all started off with me talking about how lame cheat codes are, and I *vaguely* mentioned walkthroughs as being lame, but I didn't say "they're always lame all of the time." In fact, if you go back to page 1 and re-read what I said, I said:
Quote: "I mean seriously, how would you feel if you worked your butt off to make a nifty product and get it out to hundreds of thousands of people, an awesome game that's praised by serious gamers for it's difficulty, just so Prima could come out and make a walkthrough for it, capitalizing on said difficulty (which you created) without you seeing a cent from it. The scenarios are nothing alike, but still... do you get what I'm getting at?"
Then I said...
Quote: "Using cheat codes and walkthroughs for a game is like renting a movie and fast-forwarding to the end just to see it. I've banned my friends from using them, hehe. I'm releasing two games in August, and one of them won't even have cheat codes (the other is a fighting game... hard to make without them lol). But if these games are, by some magical hand of god, selling well, I'm hoping that no one makes a walkthrough for them."
Then I said...
Quote: "I call anyone who uses cheat codes a wannabe. Gaming is an art, when the game is good worthy of the title, and people who use cheat codes don't feel it necessary to acquire any skill. Cheats are lazy, nothing more. As I've said before, when you get a movie from the video store, do you fast forward through everything just to see the end of it? And if you do, what sort of replay value does the movie/ game have? It's like the people who play MGS3 and just run through the game blowing holes in everyone. Sure, it's possible, but wth(eck) is the point? You're not getting ANYTHING out of it that way, other than the feeling that you're dominating something by cheating the system. If you didn't EARN a win, I refuse to call you a winner... you're just the opposite in my book.
"
And then finally, I said...
Quote: "I can't flex on this one, I've been an avid anti-cheat person since the NES was "hot tech." If you use a walkthrough to help you get through a level that's insanely difficult, but you work your butt off to get to that level without a walkthrough, I suppose that's okay... but you won't catch me doing it. But the people who buy the Prima book and beat the game in the first hour of owning it? That's just stupid."
That was the first serious mention of walkthroughs that I made, and my opinion hasn't changed one iota since then.
Quote: "I don't understand this statement. You work for the win, some people don't, and you pity me? I really don't see what you're getting at. I've already told you that I don't use walkthoughs, so this must just be a cheap shot without a real point. I guess that's classic Matt Rock."
Ugh, misunderstood yet again. Not you in particular, the people who use them. It's 5:13 in the morning so I guess I'm not wording things the way I should.
Quote: "The difference, however, is that I don't judge people on whether or not they use a walkthrough. "
I do, and that's what makes us different. I judge people who use walkthroughs, I judge people who voted for Bush, I judge people who drive big gas-guzzling cars for ruining the environment, I judge teenagers for their lack of respecting older stuff. I'm vocal with my opinions and I'm hated for that
I didn't turn this into a debate/ arguement, I just said my opinion and got slammed for it. And yet I always seem to take the blame for every fight that takes place on TGC, even though it doesn't make much sense. From a vague comment on how stupid I think cheats and walkthroughs are, Jake argued with me, which can be expected because he and I argue all of the time... I've done the same thing to him countless times. But ugh, I'm getting sick of constantly fighting these very one-sided battles all of the time, but I can't just *not* say my opinion, because why should I be less-entitled than anyone else? I hate that I'm labeled the TGC radical because my opinions are different than everyone elses
It's getting rediculous. If I say I like Coke, some rabid Pepsi fan is going to leap out of the woodwork knowing I'll take the bait and start a huge arguement with me. Too bad vanilla fans, I like mint-chocolate ice cream and YOU CAN'T STOP ME!!! But hey, at least it's a comfort in knowing I'll never be asked to be a moderator lol
(a comfort because that's way more responsibility than I want, and I'm saying this before some mod thinks I'm trying to insult mods or something lol)
"In an interstellar burst, I'm back to save the universe"