Quote: "But it in FACT does promote violence, But so does the movie industries, the internet, writers and their horror books, and even your own peers."
But again, there's nothing whatsoever to support this theory. In saying that you're making a point that violence didn't exist prior to modern media, and we all know how false that is. Humans were smashing each other over the head as soon as we worked out what rocks were. I'm pretty sure Hannibal, Hitler, and Ghengis Khan didn't play video games.
And you can't rightly limit it to modern media anyway. Dante's Divine Comedy was violent, and certainly wasn't a horror story. Well, some say it was the first horror story, so, bad example lol. How about the Odyssey? Jason and the Argonauts? The Bible? These all contain mass quantities of violence, depicted quite gruesomely, even in our day. Should we protest and/ or ban these works as well? I smell a "no" coming on.
Quote: "They all promote a very high degree of violence and are responsible in part for the violence that you see today."
But, as was illustrated earlier in the thread, the violent crime rate has
decreased since 1991, during the era when violent games have entered their prime. If anything, statistics show that video games have reduced violent crimes, and these aren't stats that are doctored to suit the media, they come from police departments and governments. You genuinely can't support the theory that violent media bolsters aggressive behavior in any way.
Society needs a scapegoat, and the news media needs to compete with people playing games in their free time, and so video games are made out to be far more villainous than they actually are. If a parent allows their child to play a game made for adults, and that kid has serious mental issues, we attack games and not parents? And what do you say about all those kids who aren't allowed to play video games, but turn out to be violent anyway?