Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / EA Games - Battlefield 3, throwing shoes at us?

Author
Message
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 00:17
Well, as some may have heard: they have cut support for Steam, they have cut mod support and now, theyre also skipping the use of in game menues: So each time you want to change server, you need to restart the game, for changing options, you need to restart the game and if you want to start the campaign.. well then you need to open up the browser aswell.

What are you guys thinking of this? I think it is utter.. shoe really: No mod support, no Steam support and no support for my beloved menu? I mean it just feels like EA does NOT want me atleast to buy the game..

and for the record, I am a man.

DJ Almix
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Location: Freedom
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 00:32 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 00:33
Quote: "Well, as some may have heard: they have cut support for Steam, they have cut mod support and now, theyre also skipping the use of in game menues: So each time you want to change server, you need to restart the game, for changing options, you need to restart the game and if you want to start the campaign.. well then you need to open up the browser aswell.

What are you guys thinking of this? I think it is utter.. shoe really: No mod support, no Steam support and no support for my beloved menu? I mean it just feels like EA does NOT want me atleast to buy the game.."


[Off topic fanboy babble]

I don't really care, it's still a million times better then CoD.

[On Topic]

Sure I'm a tad disappointed, but as a X-PC gamer, I'm used to all of these not being in a game by now.

[center]
swissolo
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jan 2010
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 00:52
I can understand the mod support for the time being, that isn't a necesity at game release, the steam support is sad, but Gabe said he'd do everything he could to get it on board, and... No menu? Really I haven't heard that! You sure? Either way the game is far too awesome for it to matter. Poor DICE got stuck with EA... Poor souls...

swis
No, it's not pokemon.
Joined: Tues Dec 16th 2008
Oolite
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th Sep 2005
Location: Middle of the West
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 00:55
Quote: "So each time you want to change server, you need to restart the game, for changing options, you need to restart the game and if you want to start the campaign.. well then you need to open up the browser aswell."

I don't see the problem with this. How is that different to how you normally do it? You'd have to go back to the main menu from your game to select another server anyway, which would probably take just as long. Changing some settings in most games usually requires a restart as well.
Sure, steam support is a little bit disappointing but Steam isn't the be all and end all of games.

Mountain out of Molehills I say, everybody moans too much. How are any of these things going to affect your in game experience? I'm sure that you're buying the game for, well, the game and not the menu system.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 00:56
not a hundred percent sure but:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7oUIMPyDOE&feature=feedu

5:28

and for the record, I am a man.

DJ Almix
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Location: Freedom
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 00:56 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 00:57
Quote: "I can understand the mod support for the time being, that isn't a necesity at game release, the steam support is sad, but Gabe said he'd do everything he could to get it on board, and... No menu? Really I haven't heard that! You sure? Either way the game is far too awesome for it to matter. Poor DICE got stuck with EA... Poor souls..."


Let's hope DICE hangs in and doesn't go the way of Westwood

R.I.P: The RTS genre.

as for servers:

http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/08/19/battlefield-3-pc-wont-have-in-game-server-browser-battlelog-is-the-main-menu/

[center]
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 01:01
was just about to put that here! haha x)

and for the record, I am a man.

swissolo
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jan 2010
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 01:05
I found that vid on my RIGHT before Seems odd doesn't it. Either way I'm forced to buy this game simply because it's the sequel to bf2. it'd better be good.

swis
No, it's not pokemon.
Joined: Tues Dec 16th 2008
Fuzz
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Nov 2006
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 02:24
Quote: "shoe really"


What is shoe?


lazerus
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2008
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 02:35
Shoe = Crap or its Sh--

Agent Dink
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 04:00 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 04:11
shoe = lame way of 'swearing' on the forum. Far as I'm concerned you might as well just say crap, dang, frack, or whatever. At least people know what you mean...

http://lossofanonymity.wordpress.com
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 04:57 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 18:27
Well this sucks. I enjoyed BF2 a lot and I would have liked to tried this, but I'm not paying for something that doesn't have an in-game menu.



Support a charitable indie game project!
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 05:59
I have a hard time believing there will be absolutely no front-end menu system in the game. Anyone have a link? The OP should have at least backed up his rant.


Software Engineer - Metamoki
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 07:35
I should most likely have checked my sources before yes, but i may also say that i do trust PCGamer, well time will tell. Hopefully they will confirm that it is a big lie.
I want to buy this game, but without steam support i dont know if I want to...

Yeah it might sound silly but i really dont like needing 5+ softwares on my computer to switch between to be able to just play the games =/

and for the record, I am a man.

Neuro Fuzzy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Jun 2007
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 08:18
Quote: "I should most likely have checked my sources before yes, but i may also say that i do trust PCGamer"


but you didn't list PCgamer as your source.

although, jeku, check DJ almix's link if you haven't already seen it.


Why does blue text appear every time you are near?
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 13:57
Quote: "but you didn't list PCgamer as your source."


I did not, i found it about the same time as the dude who posted it

and for the record, I am a man.

Wolf
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Nov 2007
Location: Luxemburg
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 15:21
Quote: "I mean it just feels like EA does NOT want me atleast to buy the game.."


Well, I will certainly not buy it.

I make serious coffee - so strong it wakes up the neighbors.
http://serygalacaffeine.deviantart.com/
Twitter:@Serygala
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 15:37
not with this way of doing stuff... And i dont want to get "Origins" just for one game for example, thats crap

and iam not a big fan of having to tab out/shut the game down each time i want to do something with it...

and for the record, I am a man.

Ocho Geek
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Aug 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 17:02 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 17:03
Quote: "Poor DICE got stuck with EA... Poor souls..."


Amen. If I the game is as good as it's building up to be, I'll get it. Despite all the stuff EA manages to do to it; not because of it

this written preview sounds cool. You get to see Tehran in it's entirety at the start

So yeah, I'll get it. Providing it's good. We don't necessarily need to stop buying this game because of Origin and everything else. We could spam The Origin Help service with negative feedback about the service... but that's just what I'd do if I were very angry


Not Spanish, Not Eight, Just Ocho

Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 17:04
Ohh FFS!

Is this place turning into The Escapist or something. Why not boycott it, start a poll and see if people care, go on youtube and flame BF3 fanboys...
Or you could wait until the damn thing is released and base your kneejerk on that.

Seriously, lets not turn GC into another ''EA/Apple/Bethesda/Steam ruined my pathetic life'' forum. Not directed at anyone of course, it's the constant whine from gamers these days that is making me want to disassociate from them. This forum has more learned members, we should all know better than to listen to the badly paraphrased drivel that makes up 95% of gaming news.

:: To the general gaming public ::
Developers are mis-quoted all the time to get traffic to these gaming news sites - woo hoo trolling is now a bigger marketting tool than all the other marketting tools put together. Defiance in this case simply makes gamers look like sheep, it's just the way marketting departments want it. Well done, now when this turns out to be bull you'll all be so eager to buy BF3 it won't even be funny.

Health, Ammo, and bacon and eggs!
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 17:56 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 18:35
Quote: "Is this place turning into The Escapist or something. Why not boycott it, start a poll and see if people care, go on youtube and flame BF3 fanboys...
Or you could wait until the damn thing is released and base your kneejerk on that."


Here is how i see it: i buy it, i support it: or that's how they will see it: who knows, it might become as it did with Assassins creed 2: they used DRM, people hated it and they took it away.. well after a year but still!
It is all about the concept here: If i dont like something it wont become better by me supporting it. I think you should stand for what you think to be honest: if you dont like the way someone is doing stuff then you shouldnt support it: Iam also boycotting Diablo 3, because of Blizzards extremely shoey attitude.

and honestly, the biggest reason to why iam boycotting is because I dont WANT to have to go to impulse, origin etc to play the game: I want it on steam or i dont want a service at all, just my box and me. That is the only options that i require to play a game honestly: i dont want 5 softwares with different games, i want one software with all the games.

Menues i can live without, even though it seems like a crappy hassle and I hope to Shoez that they implement Mod tools later on!


Edit: I may also that that offcourse, everything might change later on.

and another Edit: iam not a BF3 fanboy of any sort, I am just not a fan of this new way of doing stuff D':

and for the record, I am a man.

Ocho Geek
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Aug 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 18:33 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 18:39
Quote: "Why not boycott it, start a poll and see if people care, go on youtube and flame BF3 fanboys..."


Who said boycott, I never said boycott well 'FFS' I said I was getting the game

EDIT: and since escapist is gaming press, I don't think you can narrow down it's community to the site itself. It's generic gamers really. So don't play the site down


Not Spanish, Not Eight, Just Ocho

heyufool1
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Feb 2009
Location: My quiet place
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 18:59
Quote: "Iam also boycotting Diablo 3, because of Blizzards extremely shoey attitude."

Huh? I haven't been following Diablo 3 too vigorously but from what I've seen it looks amazing! What news did I miss to say otherwise?

"So hold your head up high and know. It's not the end of the road"
Switch Game Engine
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 19:01
except for the real life money for in game items auction house which is only there to rip people of (since they charge for putting items IN the story, for getting it SOLD and for taking the money out of the game)
except for that: nothing really, i just hate that

and for the record, I am a man.

Eminent
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Jul 2010
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 19:35
The people who played the Alpha for BF3 had a 80% consensus that Battlelog was good.However, the fact that you need an internet connection in order to log into Battlelog just to play the single player campaign really puts me off.


Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 19:52
Quote: "The people who played the Alpha for BF3 had a 80% consensus that Battlelog was good.However, the fact that you need an internet connection in order to log into Battlelog just to play the single player campaign really puts me off."


and iam sure all of those said that just because they could~~no iam kidding, but yeah: wether it is DRM or this: if something keeps me from playing SINGELPLAYER offline then that is just crap...

and for the record, I am a man.

lazerus
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2008
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 20:07
Drm probably wont be much of a problem. Pirates will crack it and you'll be able to use said crack with your paid for copy.

Turns out from dust was cracked on day of release, this wont be much different. I have little love for Ea, there over obsessive parents of the drm world and don't realize there just winding everyone else up. As for game menu and stuff? Not pertically worth the time searching over useless info, ill just wait to play the game and hope the Gameplay is good.

Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 20:16
Quote: "Drm probably wont be much of a problem. Pirates will crack it and you'll be able to use said crack with your paid for copy. "


still not legal... as far as i know you are not allowed to tamper with those files..

in any case: I despice the concept of DRM, by that exact reason: people WILL still crack it, why on earth would you punish the paying customer then!?

and for the record, I am a man.

lazerus
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2008
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 20:37 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 20:40
Quote: "still not legal... as far as i know you are not allowed to tamper with those files.."


Legal or not, who cares? As long as you've paid for a license, you can do what the hell you want with it. There not going to care, you've paid. If you want to play your game on a laptop without being connected to big brother screw them, do it.

If it starts to bug me i wont think twice about it, as long as i can play online still i'm not bothered at all.

Edit; and if it cant play online, ill simply get a copy of the cracked version and take that on the go with me just for the single player. Not out of sheer spite but my convenience, i'm still only using one copy of the game and i can play on it when i want. As you would expect of something you own.

Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 21:26
Quote: "Legal or not, who cares? As long as you've paid for a license, you can do what the hell you want with it. There not going to care, you've paid. If you want to play your game on a laptop without being connected to big brother screw them, do it.

If it starts to bug me i wont think twice about it, as long as i can play online still i'm not bothered at all.

Edit; and if it cant play online, ill simply get a copy of the cracked version and take that on the go with me just for the single player. Not out of sheer spite but my convenience, i'm still only using one copy of the game and i can play on it when i want. As you would expect of something you own."


Amen brother to that.

and for the record, I am a man.

Ocho Geek
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Aug 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 22:07
Quote: "Drm probably wont be much of a problem. Pirates will crack it and you'll be able to use said crack with your paid for copy. "


Well, the legality of that is questionable, it probably goes against the EULA's for Origin, and BF3, and Battlenet, and some other ones from EA which applied to the game


Not Spanish, Not Eight, Just Ocho

Oolite
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th Sep 2005
Location: Middle of the West
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 22:31 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 22:32
I don't know how this turned into a publisher war or a topic about DRM.

Lots of people are going to disagree with me but I like DRM. I don't know how people can complain about an internet check when they play the game. I can guarantee that most of you here are almost always connected to the internet anyway...

I totally understand that developers and publishers alike need to protect their product and if I ever get to the position where I'm releasing something major that is going to be played/pirated by a lot of people, then I am going to put my interests first and protect my intellectual property. I'd hope you would all do the same. Everything boils down to money at the end of the day and each pirated copy downloaded is a loss for the developer/publisher.

You don't go into a clothing store and moan that the security tags are on the clothes you want to buy and that it takes an extra five seconds at the till to take it off. It's the same thing with games for me, I understand that people need to protect their products from thieves and that it is necessary to keep the industry alive.

Like I said in my post above, people moan too much. There are plenty of worse things in the world than your game connecting to a server to see if you're a thief or not. Actually, I usually find that it's either kids(that need to vent their teen angst across the internet ) or pirates that moan about this stuff.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 22:37 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 22:38
Quote: " I don't know how people can complain about an internet check when they play the game. I can guarantee that most of you here are almost always connected to the internet anyway..."


except for my internet occationally dying for about 10-20 minutes?

edit:
Quote: "I totally understand that developers and publishers alike need to protect their product and if I ever get to the position where I'm releasing something major that is going to be played/pirated by a lot of people, then I am going to put my interests first and protect my intellectual property. I'd hope you would all do the same. Everything boils down to money at the end of the day and each pirated copy downloaded is a loss for the developer/publisher."


first of: every pirated copy isnt a loss, but i see your point there and i support it aswell.

About the putting money in protection: IT IS USELESS: people will still pirate it AT THE DAY IT IS RELEASED. That is a fact: offcourse, 5% might be scared of by the cracking process they have to do but you will loose more money than you earn on making a """uncrackable protection"""

and for the record, I am a man.

Isocadia
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Jul 2009
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 22:38
@Oolite: Have you ever thought that the people who pirate don't have the DRM. Only the people who pay for the product get annoyed by it. That's why I don't understand DRM:

Payed - Pirated:
50% - 50%

EA adds DRM which makes playing for some people impossible, but pirated version doesn't have this:

Payed - Pirated:
25% - 75%

DRM only gives people more reason to pirate. People who believe otherwise are in my eyes plain stupid.
Oolite
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th Sep 2005
Location: Middle of the West
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:04
Quote: "first of: every pirated copy isnt a loss, but i see your point there and i support it aswell."

So the person decided to pirate the game, instead of shelling out £40 for it and you don't call that a loss?

Quote: "DRM only gives people more reason to pirate. People who believe otherwise are in my eyes plain stupid."

There is no need to insult people just because we differ in opinion.


I knew that there would be a backlash for having an opinion on the internet but I stand by what I said. At the end of the day, this is the business I'm in and I'd like to protect it. I don't know facts and figures but I'd like to see some about the success rate of DRM. I'm sure that there are a few cases of games locking out legitimate users but I'm sure the success rate is far higher than what is made out across the internet.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:09
Quote: "So the person decided to pirate the game, instead of shelling out £40 for it and you don't call that a loss?"


What iam talking about that since you didn't provide a demo he decided to download it to try it out.

That is, actually what MOST people do: however everyone isnt that honest that they go buy it afterwards.

Quote: "I knew that there would be a backlash for having an opinion on the internet but I stand by what I said. At the end of the day, this is the business I'm in and I'd like to protect it."


You are not alone: iam also looking for a future in this buisness: iam just saying that I dont belive that punishing the buying customer is the right thing to do, there has to be a middle ground. You cannot stop piracy simple as that: you can slow it down, but that is all.

and for the record, I am a man.

Isocadia
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Jul 2009
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:16
Well, one way to make piracy less popular is to actually make content which a customer wants to pay for. I mean, I can name a bunch of games I would buy even if they were 80 euro's ( Portal, Skyrim etc ). Good games which I can play over and over again. Don't blame me for not wanting to pay 60 euro's for a game which stops being fun after 4 hours.

Another problem is all the internet subscription for PC games. It makes it impossible to sell games second handed, games I would usually buy for 15 euro's second hand on a market now stay 50 euro, or disappear from the shelves.

Honestly, piracy isn't the cause of PC market dieing, the PC market dieing and so desperatly trying to add DRM is what causes piracy.

Also, what I said wasn't meant insulting. But if you look at the big picture, all the games released. The ones with most DRM I can almost garantee you are those who are mostly pirated.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:19 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 23:23
Quote: "Honestly, piracy isn't the cause of PC market dieing, the PC market dieing"


PC Market isnt dying at all. You have misunderstood all that it would seem... Maybe less attractive due to "high piracy" (which i would like to say is bullshoe but okay) but it certanly isnt dead as a console.


May I also add that it is a lot of the companies fault that their games get pirated: "why is there no demo?" "naah, to expensive to make!"
well why should i buy it then? if you cant even give me that, that little thing: i want to test it before i try it: i dont buy a car without checking it out first
iam not buying a chair before sitting in it
and iam not buying a game before playing it.

Just giving more in depth trailers would help: A single CG trailer + a couple of trailers that only shows the graphics of the game doesnt help iam afraid.

and for the record, I am a man.

Isocadia
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Jul 2009
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:40
Quik, the PC market is dieing, well maybe not dieing, but I get the impression that less and less games are released on PC, and that they often are bad console ports ( fromdust anyone? ). It's not really dieing, it's just that the few good games that are left are spoiled with bad DRM.

Honestly, I really don't understand how companies cannot see that DRM is only hurting them.
Oolite
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th Sep 2005
Location: Middle of the West
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:43
Quote: "Don't blame me for not wanting to pay 60 euro's for a game which stops being fun after 4 hours."

This is the reason why demos and review websites exist in the first place. Going back to clothing stores again, what if those jeans you bought get boring after a few days of wearing them. You won't then go and steal all of your clothes in future just in case it happens again. If you don't want to shell out £40 for a game that will last you four hours then don't. In my eyes that isn't a reason to steal anything.
Quote: "What iam talking about that since you didn't provide a demo he decided to download it to try it out."

I don't see this as a reason to steal anything either. I agree that a demo should be a no brainer to publicise your game. Just because you can't try before you buy doesn't mean you should just nick it instead. This is the reason I have a loveFilm subscription. I can try before I buy (on longer games) or just blast through a short game for under a tenner a month. Not a bad deal at all.
Quote: "Another problem is all the internet subscription for PC games. It makes it impossible to sell games second handed, games I would usually buy for 15 euro's second hand on a market now stay 50 euro, or disappear from the shelves."

Now this whole thing about stopping second hand selling is a little annoying, again, I can understand why they are doing it but there have been long stretches of my life where I've relied on the cheapness of second hand games to actually get any entertainment. Now that I've actually got a bit of money behind me I don't rely on second hand games so much, they are usually impulse buys of games that I missed or I might want to play.

Quote: "The ones with most DRM I can almost garantee you are those who are mostly pirated."

The games that are pirated the most are the games that people want the most. Maybe a small percentage of those are legitimate buyers who are having some trouble with the DRM but most of the people who pirate it can't afford it and are too impatient to wait. Or they are people who just flat out don't want to buy the game.

Quote: "Honestly, piracy isn't the cause of PC market dieing, the PC market dieing and so desperatly trying to add DRM is what causes piracy."

I didn't realise the PC market was dying, Indie games are massive and as far as I was aware, AAA titles are still being pushed out throughout the year with a decent sales rate.
Whichever way you look at it though, Piracy does damage the industry, whether it puts developers off building PC exclusives or whether it forces them to use extensive DRM measures that clearly aren't received well.
Quote: "Also, what I said wasn't meant insulting."

Good stuff, I don't want to turn a friendly debate into a pointless insult war... not yet anyway.
ionstream
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2004
Location: Overweb
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:44
First of all, why are you trying to put the word "shoe" in as many sentences as possible? Is it a My Little Pony reference?

Secondly, DRM does not mean you "get" to pirate the game. And I'm glad Van B pointed out how stupid those gaming news sites are. BF3 is going to be a good game, DRM or not.

If you don't like their methods of protecting the products they make, then you don't have to buy it.

DJ Almix
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Location: Freedom
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:48
Quote: "Quik, the PC market is dieing, well maybe not dieing, but I get the impression that less and less games are released on PC, and that they often are bad console ports ( fromdust anyone? ). It's not really dieing, it's just that the few good games that are left are spoiled with bad DRM.

Honestly, I really don't understand how companies cannot see that DRM is only hurting them."


I don't see spending $400 every 6 months to play each new $60 dollar game a wise investment. Consules have been around for nearly 6 years and they are still doing just fine, but you look at PC's and you have to keep throwing money at them

over,

and over,

and over,

again...

So maybe it's about the amount money people have. Sure there are a few reason's to buy a PC game versus consules.

The only reason I see to buy a PC game now, is for modding, and it has to have a GOOD, LARGE modding community, but it seems as though only old games have large modding communities now :/

[center]
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:49
Quote: "I don't see this as a reason to steal anything either. I agree that a demo should be a no brainer to publicise your game. Just because you can't try before you buy doesn't mean you should just nick it instead. This is the reason I have a loveFilm subscription. I can try before I buy (on longer games) or just blast through a short game for under a tenner a month. Not a bad deal at all."


here is where you dont understand me, iam not saying you should nick it, iam saying you should do what the devs should have: given you an oppurtunity to test the game.

and for the record, I am a man.

Isocadia
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Jul 2009
Location:
Posted: 31st Aug 2011 23:55 Edited at: 31st Aug 2011 23:56
After reading Oolite's post:

1. The games that are most wanted are not always the best games. Indie games indeed are still massive, but guess what, they often don't use crappy DRM like constant internet connection or a maximum amount of installations.

2. I don't believe that piracy damages the industry. Cause if you look at it this way ( the optimal strategy I believe ):

1. I make a game, and sell it for 60 dollars. 40% of the people buy it, 40% pirate it.

2. Next, my game is out for a few months, it starts to get cheaper, so 10% of the people buy it when it's cheaper, still 10% didn't buy it at all.

3. The game quits the stores, and the other 10% buys it second handed.

Lets analyse this:

1. The company doesn't loose any money, since the people who pirate it wouldn't have bought it in the first place.

2. The company still doesn't loose any money, better yet, they make some more due to the price drop.

3. The company still hasn't lost money, and have gotten all the money they could possibly have.

Now, if I make my game with online playability, or make small items like hats etc. cost a little bit of money. atleast 20% of later bought copy's will still want to buy those items. And some pirater's will buy the game cheaper just for the online playing or the hats.

Now, if we add excessive anoying DRM to this. You don't get the money from step 2 ( 3 if hats etc. are included ). Even worse, you might even lose some of you're original buyers.

TLDR: Piracy doesn't make companies lose money, DRM does that.
Le Shorte
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posted: 1st Sep 2011 00:08
Quote: "EA adds DRM which makes playing for some people impossible, but pirated version doesn't have this:

Payed - Pirated:
25% - 75%"

If it's impossible for those people to connect to the internet to play the game, then how would they pirate it?

Cheesehead for life.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 1st Sep 2011 00:12
That is reallty not at all the point here is it?

and for the record, I am a man.

Le Shorte
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posted: 1st Sep 2011 00:25
Quote: "That is reallty not at all the point here is it?"

Well, having read every single post in this thread, it sure has become the point :/

But I won't be buying BF3, unless I can find it for about $20. Not worth all the trouble, really. And it looks exactly like BC2, which I wasn't the biggest fan of. Sure, it looks fun. But Origins, Battlelog, plus having BF3 running as a non-Steam game? Not worth the $60 just to have endless headaches. And there is no way in hell I'd buy it for my PS3.
It's really sad when the Black Ops mod tools were confirmed pretty much since they started talking about the PC version, but BF3 is getting a "we're thinking about it."
I can't stand the choices made with BF3, so I'm voting with my wallet.

Cheesehead for life.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 1st Sep 2011 00:32
Quote: "Well, having read every single post in this thread, it sure has become the point :/"


It is PART of it, but the main point would be that most pirates actually just want to try out the game

and for the record, I am a man.

Le Shorte
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posted: 1st Sep 2011 00:46 Edited at: 1st Sep 2011 00:47
Quote: "most pirates actually just want to try out the game"

Am I like the only person that's never pirated a game?
Of course, I have reason to believe most people on this forum haven't. But it seems quite a lot of people do.

Cheesehead for life.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 1st Sep 2011 07:27
I'd say that is a morality question to be honest, if i noticed my game was being pirated i know i wouldnt try to stop it: because i CAN'T. It would be a waste of money. And quite frankly, like Notch have said: "Pirates are only potential customers".

I, myself actually think that piracy helps the industry somewhat, but then that varies from game to game.
I also think that more people is willing to pay for a indie game, since it is so shoe cheap...


I would also say that i feel the moderators creeping up my back atm...

and for the record, I am a man.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-20 11:59:34
Your offset time is: 2025-05-20 11:59:34