Found this interestingish article on IQ:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201409/the-complex-cognitive-plane-and-new-measure-iq
Basically it's this:

saying there are two different axises of IQ.
My opinion? It's wrong

Why? Simple:
1. There were/are a lot of Geniuses who were/are religious
2. There were/are a lot of scientists who were/are religious
3. There were/are a lot of retards ('intellectually challenged') who were/are religious
4. There were/are a lot [tonne] of scientists who were/are geniues [and vice versa]
5. There were/are even a lot of retards who were/are geniuses ('
Idiot Savant')
However, I agree that there is more to IQ than the analytical capability tested by classic IQ tests.
Examples:
1. Motor Skills (athletes, ninja's etc

)
2. Musical intelligence (Bach, Chopin etc)
3. Analytical intelligence ('classic' intelligence, Newton, Einstein etc)
4. Philosophical intelligence (Descartes etc)
5. Interpersonal intelligence ('The friendliest person you know probably fits this category')
Well, what do ya'all think of ma new theory
EDIT: Unfortunately I thought of another one, Artistic intelligence (Da Vinci, Michelangelo etc). This is disappointing because 5 is a much cooler number than 6



