That grandmother suing Rockstar is way out of line. There was clearly, even then, on the case, a warning for Graphic Violence, Sexual Content, Large Amounts of Drug Use etc... and the name of the game coincedentaly, is Grand Theft Auto in the october PS2 release of the game.
At first rockstar didn't say anything. Then Rockstar was trying to hide, saying they (being the haxx0rs) had added the code, which nobody belived, as it was a quite stupid excuse. Then eventually they admitted that the programmer who was working on that minigame in, didn't remove the code because he was a damned moron. He was fired.
Still the question runs through my mind, what if the mini-game was in the game in the first place? Would this of gotten even half of the attention that it has gotten? Would the rating of been made AO right then? Killer 7 (as jack thompson, whom I probably hate the most in this world, has pointed out now) has full blown sex cut scenes, and it quite a bit more gorey then GTASA. Killer 7 was, and still is, a rated M game (Which I thought when I played it at my friends house, that it was surely a AO game, especially after I had been fresh minded of the rating change of GTA. It is pretty gorey at points and it is full blown sex).
Not that I care about any game being rated or censored in anyway, I think if we can have sex, nudity, decaptition etc... in rated R movies, we should be able to have it in rated M games. And after it leaves the publisher to the stores, it should be the stores and the parents responsibility to not let their kids play "bad" games, not the developers and the publishers.
