Quote: "I've deleted the posts where people thought it was OK to express their opinion, and tell everyone else not to get the thread locked. The next one will have to be a lock."
I feel even more 'enraged' to share my opinion now, than I did when I posted the original text. Did you even
read what I wrote?
In the 100% likelihood that you didn't, I shared my opinion, 'balanced' against the opposite view, and stated an objective outcome. Case in point: The Viet Nam one shared a lot of opinion, but I just wanted to establish that it was invaded for more besides the welfare of its people.
And with the triad of inconsistency, all I said was that neither view could be 100% proven or dis-proven by it, because both sides depend on assumption
So if anything, I was trying to
defuse an argument (at least in the latter, the former wasn't entirely necessary) not create one. And in any case,
how on earth can my posts be inciting arguments etc. if Jeku's do not? I don't have anything against your post Jeku, and it was 'fair' since you explained its purpose, and it didn't intentionally seek argument. But there is definitely a lack of logic regarding the removal of my (and other) posts, if that one wasn't removed.
09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0